|
|
|
rajkan
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2008, 05:28:57 PM » |
|
The Samsung looks a lot smarter.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
R Kanabar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grier78
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2008, 05:38:52 PM » |
|
Samsung FTW. But there is little to differentiate them IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dan
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2008, 07:19:37 PM » |
|
I have plumped for the samsung. Managed to get it up for £359 plus free delivery thanks to a few evouchers I have found around the net.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2008, 02:39:06 PM » |
|
L.G are a budget brand stear clear imo. i have a ps3 that i move between 2 rooms i have a samsung lcd in 1 and a sony bravia lcd in the other.overall the sony is the better machine but the ps3 looks better on the samsung i think. (maybe just colur settings dunno)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cdw1111
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2008, 02:54:24 PM » |
|
The rule used to be plasma for over 40",lcd for under but lcd is catching up fast.Just look for 1080p as this is full hd,PS3 games are only 726p at the minute but its only a matter of time till full hd.I have a panasonic 42"plasma and the ps3 is great.Check out avforumsuk,very geeky however loads of info if you can be bothered to trawl through,including any good deals at the minute.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
shy bairns get nowt
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2008, 04:27:40 PM » |
|
Thanks for help - so 1080i is no good?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2008, 04:33:43 PM » |
|
its awsome but 1080p is awsomer lol
tbh you cant tell the difference
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rex008
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2008, 09:32:37 AM » |
|
You have to be careful with TVs advertised as "1080i compatible", as they are often 780 line ("HD Ready") TVs that will downscale a 1080 signal. For the full future-proof monty you need to look out for "Full HD" with 1080p compatibility, and ideally look for one that will accept 1080p24, ie 24 frames per second, which is film speed, and gives the best possible picture for HD films.
Personally, I'd go for plasma, as they generally give much more accurate colour reproduction. But you do have to be slightly careful about screen burn on them if you have a static image or logo displayed for long periods. That's about the only downside with them.
I'd +1 on the avforums.com. Lots of info over there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
The secret to a happy life - "Never pass up a chance to have sex or appear on television." - Gore Vidal
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2008, 10:38:45 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham C
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 01, 2009, 10:26:26 PM » |
|
Never heard of Sense and tbh I'd avoid it, it's just too cheap for a decent tele.
The Toshiba is a decent box, when I got mine it was a toss up between that (37") and a Panasonic LCD and Plasma, but I went for the Panasonic plasma even though it wasn't 1080p. The colours were a lot better on the plasma and even though it wasn't full HD, I couldn't tell when the two screens were sat next to each other showing the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 01, 2009, 10:29:02 PM » |
|
thanks Silo - I've been searching for a reasonable 40/42inch full HD for >600 - it's tough.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author