poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 23, 2025, 06:35:11 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262395
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Art or Science ?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
Author
Topic: Art or Science ? (Read 7816 times)
WYSINWYG
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 669
MPD sufferer. (+2 Hidden)
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #30 on:
September 12, 2008, 02:34:50 PM »
Artist + Year > starter for 10.
Logged
They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.
bobAlike
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5823
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #31 on:
September 12, 2008, 04:05:16 PM »
Quote from: WYSINWYG on September 12, 2008, 02:34:50 PM
Artist + Year > starter for 10.
Damien Hurst 1992??
Logged
Ah! The element of surprise
bobAlike
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5823
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #32 on:
September 12, 2008, 04:05:56 PM »
Quote from: bobAlike on September 12, 2008, 04:05:16 PM
Quote from: WYSINWYG on September 12, 2008, 02:34:50 PM
Artist + Year > starter for 10.
Damien Hurst 1992??
Pharmacy??
Logged
Ah! The element of surprise
WYSINWYG
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 669
MPD sufferer. (+2 Hidden)
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #33 on:
September 12, 2008, 05:34:39 PM »
Quote from: bobAlike on September 12, 2008, 04:05:56 PM
Quote from: bobAlike on September 12, 2008, 04:05:16 PM
Quote from: WYSINWYG on September 12, 2008, 02:34:50 PM
Artist + Year > starter for 10.
Damien Hurst 1992??
Pharmacy??
Correct, well done.
Unsure why that is art or commands such a fee. I did see it in situ, along with cows/fly zapper/lost lamb. I may play a game of heads up in the Tate Modern and then sell the exhibit for a couple of million...
Logged
They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.
bobAlike
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5823
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #34 on:
September 12, 2008, 05:47:57 PM »
Quote from: WYSINWYG on September 12, 2008, 05:34:39 PM
Quote from: bobAlike on September 12, 2008, 04:05:56 PM
Quote from: bobAlike on September 12, 2008, 04:05:16 PM
Quote from: WYSINWYG on September 12, 2008, 02:34:50 PM
Artist + Year > starter for 10.
Damien Hurst 1992??
Pharmacy??
Correct, well done.
Unsure why that is art or commands such a fee. I did see it in situ, along with cows/fly zapper/lost lamb. I may play a game of heads up in the Tate Modern and then sell the exhibit for a couple of million...
You might aswell one of the most recent displays was a crack in the floor!
Logged
Ah! The element of surprise
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6734
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #35 on:
September 12, 2008, 06:28:57 PM »
Quote from: tikay on September 11, 2008, 06:04:05 PM
Art? Science? Neither! It's just a game, and a largely luck-based game at that.
Clearly the words of a man running bad. When you run good it is most certainly a game of skill.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #36 on:
September 12, 2008, 06:33:46 PM »
Quote from: MANTIS01 on September 12, 2008, 06:28:57 PM
Quote from: tikay on September 11, 2008, 06:04:05 PM
Art? Science? Neither! It's just a game, and a largely luck-based game at that.
Clearly the words of a man running bad. When you run good it is most certainly a game of skill.
No, when I'm running good it's certainly a game of luck!
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
WYSINWYG
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 669
MPD sufferer. (+2 Hidden)
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #37 on:
September 12, 2008, 06:43:08 PM »
If it wasn't for luck I'd lose every hand.
Logged
They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.
FuglyBaz
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 662
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #38 on:
September 13, 2008, 06:06:30 AM »
Poker imo is closer to a science than an art form.
The one game that gets closest to art form for me is Chess. Although I know some will argue that fencing can be considered as art too, but I will sit on the fence for that one
Logged
ScottMGee
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 481
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #39 on:
September 13, 2008, 06:55:53 AM »
Quote
You can teach a computer to play any game - does that mean any game is a science?
Pretty Much
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #40 on:
September 13, 2008, 07:04:18 AM »
Quote from: FuglyBaz on September 13, 2008, 06:06:30 AM
Although I know some will argue that fencing can be considered as art too, but I will sit on the fence for that one
The gag doesn't work like that. Fence is the punchline so you can't use it for the set-up aswell.
Try replacing fencing with a synonym. Swordfighting perhaps?
So the new gag reads...
I know some will argue that swordfighting can be considered an art, but I will sit on the fence for that one.
Read the old and the new aloud to yourself. Which sounds better?
Remember, cheesy puns are a science.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
FuglyBaz
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 662
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #41 on:
September 13, 2008, 07:10:06 AM »
Quote from: thetank on September 13, 2008, 07:04:18 AM
Quote from: FuglyBaz on September 13, 2008, 06:06:30 AM
Although I know some will argue that fencing can be considered as art too, but I will sit on the fence for that one
The gag doesn't work like that. Fence is the punchline so you can't use it for the set-up aswell.
Try replacing fencing with a synonym. Swordfighting perhaps?
So the new gag reads...
I know some will argue that swordfighting can be considered an art, but I will sit on the fence for that one.
Read the old and the new aloud to yourself. Which sounds better?
Remember, cheesy puns are a science.
Can I use the excuse that i am on life tilt and havet slept in 48 hours please?
I was gonna mention as well:-
You cant teach a computer to play every game. A computer doesnt play chess when you play it, it calculates the best position in middlegame and endgames working many moves ahead. But it cannot interpret tactics and understad simple moves sometimes (2nd game of Kasparov v Deep Blue in 1997 for example). Without databases of over 2,000,000 games chess programs would be useless as they would have no idea on how to play openings.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that computers can be taught how to play games but they cannot play them well all of the time. Sorry for rambling on about chess on a poker forum
Oh and Cheesy puns FTMFW
«
Last Edit: September 13, 2008, 07:13:10 AM by FuglyBaz
»
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #42 on:
September 13, 2008, 07:29:03 AM »
I wouldn't worry about it. Chess is very similar game to poker in several respects. Also, many of the posters here are pretty decent chess players.
Personally I'm fascinated that a luck element exists in chess, even though it is a game of complete information.
Not just your opponent missing an important move or something like that, but the luck factor coming into play in your own moves too.
The human mind bing unable to extrapolate a given middlegame position into it's exponentially numerous consequences. A lot of the moves will be largely based on positional understanding and feel. The realtive likelyhood of the later consequences of many moves, even at the GM level, are unknown when the move is played.
When people are bemoaning their bad luck at cards, you will often here someone say something like, "you want a game with no luck where the best player wins all the time, go play chess."
It's a pet hate of mine. Why have more than two games to decide the world champion if this were true?
«
Last Edit: September 13, 2008, 07:32:25 AM by thetank
»
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
FuglyBaz
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 662
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #43 on:
September 13, 2008, 07:57:33 AM »
Quote from: thetank on September 13, 2008, 07:29:03 AM
I wouldn't worry about it. Chess is very similar game to poker in several respects. Also, many of the posters here are pretty decent chess players.
Personally I'm fascinated that a luck element exists in chess, even though it is a game of complete information.
Not just your opponent missing an important move or something like that, but the luck factor coming into play in your own moves too.
The human mind bing unable to extrapolate a given middlegame position into it's exponentially numerous consequences. A lot of the moves will be largely based on positional understanding and feel. The realtive likelyhood of the later consequences of many moves, even at the GM level, are unknown when the move is played.
When people are bemoaning their bad luck at cards, you will often here someone say something like, "you want a game with no luck where the best player wins all the time, go play chess."
It's a pet hate of mine. Why have more than two games to decide the world champion if this were true?
I'll be honest I haven't heard that saying as frequently but I have heard it.
Thats very true what you say about the luck. I'm only rated about 1400 (not bad for only 8 weks of pla I guess) and will say luck doesnt just come with the end position, but also with things like discovered attacks that you dont see. I dont know whether it is ignorance or bad luck to miss a forking opportunity, but things like that play a part too.
I always assumed the WC was played over one game till I actually started plaing chess. Its such a great game, and if I could become a GM or a least an expert I would work my arse off towards it. At least the only money I spend that way is on books, rather than potentially losing loads over the felt
Logged
ScottMGee
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 481
Re: Art or Science ?
«
Reply #44 on:
September 14, 2008, 08:24:29 AM »
Oxford dictionary definition of luck -
Quote
luck
• noun 1 success or failure apparently brought by chance. 2 chance considered as a force causing success or failure. 3 good fortune.
• verb informal 1 (luck into/upon) chance to find or acquire. 2 (luck out) N. Amer. succeed due to good luck.
Not sure how chess fits into this.
Logged
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...