poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 22, 2025, 07:24:57 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262375
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
The Lounge
Chess discussion.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
Author
Topic: Chess discussion. (Read 13383 times)
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #90 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM »
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8664
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #91 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:31:51 AM »
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
Correction its actually 9... He sits them in a sort of hexagon shape, so even though there is panels in front of each opponent, they are essentially opposite another player. He then remembers the moves from each player, then when he gets around to the 'opposite' player, plays that move, so really its a memory thing rather than chess... But he does beat 1 fair and square essentially, because obviously he can only pair '4 v 4'...
Dont think ive explained that very well...
Logged
The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6202
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #92 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:32:16 AM »
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
IIRC this is indeed the trick that Derren Brown was doing - just on a bigger scale
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8664
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #93 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:33:33 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evZmpsl3jI0
Logged
The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #94 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:40:21 AM »
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:31:51 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
Correction its actually 9... He sits them in a sort of hexagon shape, so even though there is panels in front of each opponent, they are essentially opposite another player. He then remembers the moves from each player, then when he gets around to the 'opposite' player, plays that move, so really its a memory thing rather than chess... But he does beat 1 fair and square essentially, because obviously he can only pair '4 v 4'...
Dont think ive explained that very well...
You think he'd beat a Grand Master fair and square?
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8664
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #95 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:48:05 AM »
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:40:21 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:31:51 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
Correction its actually 9... He sits them in a sort of hexagon shape, so even though there is panels in front of each opponent, they are essentially opposite another player. He then remembers the moves from each player, then when he gets around to the 'opposite' player, plays that move, so really its a memory thing rather than chess... But he does beat 1 fair and square essentially, because obviously he can only pair '4 v 4'...
Dont think ive explained that very well...
You think he'd beat a Grand Master fair and square?
watch the clip, i think its a GM, he beats him somehow...
Logged
The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #96 on:
September 17, 2008, 09:49:07 AM »
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:48:05 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:40:21 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:31:51 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: TheChipPrince on September 17, 2008, 09:24:44 AM
Quote from: kinboshi on September 17, 2008, 09:02:05 AM
Playing against computers, or even unknowingly against other strong players (i.e. someone plays against two strong players, black on one board, white on the other and copies the moves of this opponents - so effectively playing the same game from each side) is a problem with internet chess.
have you seen the Derren Brown episode Kin where he plays 8 grand masters simultaneously?
No, does he cheat?
I remember a Hercule Poirot story where someone plays two Grand Masters on a train in separate carriages and gets a draw in both. They were essentially playing each other, but good old Hercule sussed it.
Correction its actually 9... He sits them in a sort of hexagon shape, so even though there is panels in front of each opponent, they are essentially opposite another player. He then remembers the moves from each player, then when he gets around to the 'opposite' player, plays that move, so really its a memory thing rather than chess... But he does beat 1 fair and square essentially, because obviously he can only pair '4 v 4'...
Dont think ive explained that very well...
You think he'd beat a Grand Master fair and square?
watch the clip, i think its a GM, he beats him
somehow
...
Not fairly through outplaying him at chess I'd be willing to bet your bollocks on.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
sovietsong
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8479
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #97 on:
September 17, 2008, 11:51:06 AM »
I'm shocked that none of the chess players figured out that he wasn't actually playing his own moves!
Logged
In the category of Funniest Poster I nominate sovietsong. - mantis 21/12/2012
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6202
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #98 on:
September 17, 2008, 11:56:50 AM »
Quote from: sovietsong on September 17, 2008, 11:51:06 AM
I'm shocked that none of the chess players figured out that he wasn't actually playing his own moves!
One of the main skills of a magician/illusionist is misdirection - so people don't notice what you're really doing.
That's where his skill lies.
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #99 on:
September 17, 2008, 11:59:59 AM »
anyone know how he beat no. 9?
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #100 on:
September 17, 2008, 12:25:35 PM »
Quote from: gatso on September 17, 2008, 11:59:59 AM
anyone know how he beat no. 9?
Number of options - hypnotism, the player lost on purpose (he paid him off), he wasn't a grand master, etc. Same way he does his other tricks.
«
Last Edit: September 17, 2008, 12:27:10 PM by kinboshi
»
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22503
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #101 on:
September 17, 2008, 12:27:42 PM »
Quote from: gatso on September 17, 2008, 11:59:59 AM
anyone know how he beat no. 9?
Coz he was crap and derren whipped his ass
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #102 on:
September 17, 2008, 12:35:43 PM »
Quote from: mondatoo on September 17, 2008, 12:27:42 PM
Quote from: gatso on September 17, 2008, 11:59:59 AM
anyone know how he beat no. 9?
Coz he was crap and derren whipped his ass
no, he was the worst but wasn't crap. and he says something about having played a gm before and db being as good/better doesn't he?
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
mondatoo
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22503
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #103 on:
September 17, 2008, 12:37:55 PM »
Quote from: gatso on September 17, 2008, 12:35:43 PM
Quote from: mondatoo on September 17, 2008, 12:27:42 PM
Quote from: gatso on September 17, 2008, 11:59:59 AM
anyone know how he beat no. 9?
Coz he was crap and derren whipped his ass
no, he was the worst but wasn't crap. and he says something about having played a gm before and db being as good/better doesn't he?
He said that just to make himself look good.I woulda beat his ass.SShhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Chess discussion.
«
Reply #104 on:
September 17, 2008, 12:39:13 PM »
Think the solution is simple.
He could have mirrored one of the better gms game against two opponents rather than one.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...