blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 15, 2025, 10:06:39 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262920 Posts in 66616 Topics by 16993 Members
Latest Member: jobinkhosla
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Thread Temporarily Removed.......
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Thread Temporarily Removed.......  (Read 19141 times)
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #120 on: April 10, 2009, 02:06:12 PM »


Lol.

"......have you heard of Harry Lonsdale - otherwise known as 'ack you up with a 'atchet 'arry?"........
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #121 on: April 10, 2009, 02:08:54 PM »

Would it be an 'atchet?
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #122 on: April 10, 2009, 02:16:09 PM »

Would it be an 'atchet?

VERY good question. It certainly scans better.

So, it's "a hatchet", & "an 'atchet", yes?

I'm sure Bronson would know.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Rod Paradise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7650


View Profile
« Reply #123 on: April 10, 2009, 02:55:26 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.
Logged

May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #124 on: April 10, 2009, 03:01:04 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.

Is that because usually because when a police officer is killed there is someone to blame?
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Rod Paradise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7650


View Profile
« Reply #125 on: April 10, 2009, 03:08:23 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.

Is that because usually because when a police officer is killed there is someone to blame?

And when a member of public is killed there's no-one to blame?

If I'd assaulted someone & he'd had a heart attack in the aftermath I'd be facing man-slaughter/culpable homicide charges right now. The onus would be on me to claim self-defense whatever. But, as usual, the police will smear the name of the guy accuse him of being drunk/violent (there are alegedly witnesses to him being hit on the head with a baton previously, could he be concussed?)

The Brasillian shot was running away said the police to the press - then the CCTV shows he wasn't. He seemed to be setting off a bomb, erm the witnesses said he didn't.

If the cops act like criminals covering their own wrongdoings then no wonder no one trusts them. They began the propoganda campaign about the protests well in advance to justify their tactics, unfortunately too many believe them.
Logged

May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
Boba Fett
Doctor of Thugonomics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2922


Pain is Temporary!


View Profile
« Reply #126 on: April 10, 2009, 03:14:43 PM »


Wow, 8 pages about this guy's tragic death, everyone's view set in stone, for or against, with few seeming to be able to grasp the difference between "Murder" & "Manslaughter", & all this on a poker forum. Good stuff, really.

I really hope there is an equally extreme reaction & outcry of protest next time a serving police officer or Serviceman/woman is killed in the line of duty.
If a civilian were to attack and push a police officer to the ground and they died shortly after, would there even be a discussion?  They would be insta locked up and the key thrown away.

I dont have much of an opinion on this specific incident as I havent read any articles on it and only just watched the video however I do feel that the police as a whole act like in a lot of situations they are above the law and will take advantage and abuse their position.

If this incident wasnt caught on camera this officers actions would never be questioned and any public complaints dismissed.
Logged

Ya gotta crawl before ya ball!
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #127 on: April 10, 2009, 03:38:58 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.

Is that because usually because when a police officer is killed there is someone to blame?

And when a member of public is killed there's no-one to blame?

If I'd assaulted someone & he'd had a heart attack in the aftermath I'd be facing man-slaughter/culpable homicide charges right now. The onus would be on me to claim self-defense whatever. But, as usual, the police will smear the name of the guy accuse him of being drunk/violent (there are alegedly witnesses to him being hit on the head with a baton previously, could he be concussed?)

The Brasillian shot was running away said the police to the press - then the CCTV shows he wasn't. He seemed to be setting off a bomb, erm the witnesses said he didn't.

If the cops act like criminals covering their own wrongdoings then no wonder no one trusts them. They began the propoganda campaign about the protests well in advance to justify their tactics, unfortunately too many believe them.

Didn't say that.  I wasn't talking about a member of the public being killed.  I was referring to when a police officer is killed 'in the line of duty' there's often someone to blame.  It's the nature of the role.  The same way that gravity is probably a key factor in accidents at work involving steeplejacks or window cleaners.

I didn't say if I agreed or disagreed with the other points - I was merely focusing on one specific point.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
henrik777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2664



View Profile
« Reply #128 on: April 10, 2009, 04:47:19 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.

There always seem to be less witnesses when something happens to a police officer than there are when a member of public has something happen to them.

Sandy
Logged
henrik777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2664



View Profile
« Reply #129 on: April 10, 2009, 04:49:14 PM »


Wow, 8 pages about this guy's tragic death, everyone's view set in stone, for or against, with few seeming to be able to grasp the difference between "Murder" & "Manslaughter", & all this on a poker forum. Good stuff, really.

I really hope there is an equally extreme reaction & outcry of protest next time a serving police officer or Serviceman/woman is killed in the line of duty.
If a civilian were to attack and push a police officer to the ground and they died shortly after, would there even be a discussion?  They would be insta locked up and the key thrown away.

I dont have much of an opinion on this specific incident as I havent read any articles on it and only just watched the video however I do feel that the police as a whole act like in a lot of situations they are above the law and will take advantage and abuse their position.

If this incident wasnt caught on camera this officers actions would never be questioned and any public complaints dismissed.

"Rangers fans" attack on a police officer in Manchester didn't get many insta lock ups as i recall as an example (not of death though)

Sandy
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #130 on: April 10, 2009, 04:50:55 PM »


...

If the police routinely deal with incidents where a member of the public is killed with the same level of attention and manpower as when one of their own is killed then your final paragraph has some relevance. If this is not the case (as is understandable) then it's right and proper for us (as members of the public) to look after our own a little too.

Every time anybody is killed by the police there is an investigation.

From the ones I've seen then, if anything, the investigations where the police themselves are killed tend to be less rigorous.

Oh really? Maybe the investigations are more vigorous, but the cops all seem to queue up to cover for eachother & in the end no-one is punished beyond demotion & suspension. Not many  killings of police end with no-one to blame.

There always seem to be less witnesses when something happens to a police officer than there are when a member of public has something happen to them.

Sandy

Who kills a copper when people are looking? That's just bad buisness that is.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
CelticGeezeer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 909


Viva la Quinta Brigada


View Profile WWW
« Reply #131 on: April 17, 2009, 05:17:51 PM »

Interesting development


 Family reaction

 Mr Tomlinson's step-son, said "First we were told that there had been no contact with the police, then we were told that he died of a heart attack.

Mr Tomlinson's step son says he hopes the "full truth will come out in the end"

"Now we know that he was violently assaulted by a police officer and died from internal bleeding. As time goes on we hope that the full truth about how Ian died will be made known."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8004222.stm
« Last Edit: April 17, 2009, 06:31:54 PM by CelticGeezeer » Logged

"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." - Dom Helder Camara
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #132 on: April 17, 2009, 05:59:44 PM »


just heard that on the news - certainly puts a different slant on things.
Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6203



View Profile
« Reply #133 on: April 17, 2009, 08:09:34 PM »


just heard that on the news - certainly puts a different slant on things.

But

"The statement concluded that both the opinions remained provisional and subject to further investigations and tests."

i.e. it may have been internal haemorrhaging caused by assault and it may have still been a death by natural causes.

The 2nd coroner - instructed by the prosecution - is of the opinion that it was caused by the assault
the 1st coroner was of the opinion that it was natural causes

Both opinions are still provisional and possible whatever way the news chooses to report it.
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
redsimon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8631



View Profile
« Reply #134 on: April 17, 2009, 08:42:23 PM »


just heard that on the news - certainly puts a different slant on things.

But

"The statement concluded that both the opinions remained provisional and subject to further investigations and tests."

i.e. it may have been internal haemorrhaging caused by assault and it may have still been a death by natural causes.

The 2nd coroner - instructed by the prosecution - is of the opinion that it was caused by the assault
the 1st coroner was of the opinion that it was natural causes

Both opinions are still provisional and possible whatever way the news chooses to report it.

The second post mortem was requested by IPCC, and Tomlinson's family. Prosecutions are made by CPS. Need to read the article with an open mind?
Logged

Success has many parents but failure is an orphan

http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.253 seconds with 20 queries.