blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2025, 12:05:36 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262378 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Good Reveal Hand from $320 20k on I poker (with edit of chips stacks)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Good Reveal Hand from $320 20k on I poker (with edit of chips stacks)  (Read 3785 times)
celtic
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19178



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2009, 04:59:45 PM »

Fold.
Logged

Keefy is back Smiley But for how long?
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2009, 05:04:38 PM »

I can't see you are ahead. Fold.

I bet you called and were ahead!
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6734


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 13, 2009, 11:44:08 PM »

At any point in this hand did you think your A gave you outs? If you did it would add weight to suggestions about playing the hand more aggressively from the start. But you didn't think that, and it's the reason you decided to play the hand more passively. I think if we did decide the A is a winner...now that it's arrived...after basing our strat around it not being a winner...calling would suck.
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
pokerfan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5551



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 14, 2009, 12:45:08 AM »

call
Logged

Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41933



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2009, 07:36:05 AM »

shove and watch him fold like a girlie
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2009, 09:21:09 AM »

shove and watch him fold like a girlie

Pls don't!
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2009, 11:05:31 AM »

OK

well the A kinda threw me. I went back thru the hand and decided that the turn bet wasnt enough to protect a set (which you would natrually do), and that coupled with the number of hands he had played prob gave me some show down vakue - so i called!

He had the 10. and a 7

Still not sure about my call - it just felt right at the time. I guess 50% of the time here i get shown 555
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8039


rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2009, 02:39:15 PM »

get it in on the flop, so many combodraws you have crushed. Failing that i dont mind call call call line but i think u stack so many hands u have crushed if u get it in n the flop w bdsd+nfd+over.
Logged
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6734


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2009, 03:38:41 PM »

OK

well the A kinda threw me. I went back thru the hand and decided that the turn bet wasnt enough to protect a set (which you would natrually do), and that coupled with the number of hands he had played prob gave me some show down vakue - so i called!

He had the 10. and a 7

Still not sure about my call - it just felt right at the time. I guess 50% of the time here i get shown 555

You think his turn bet wasn't big enough to protect a set....but when he MIN-RAISES the flop you think he has a set because his bet is small?
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2009, 04:38:20 PM »

OK

well the A kinda threw me. I went back thru the hand and decided that the turn bet wasnt enough to protect a set (which you would natrually do), and that coupled with the number of hands he had played prob gave me some show down vakue - so i called!

He had the 10. and a 7

Still not sure about my call - it just felt right at the time. I guess 50% of the time here i get shown 555

You think his turn bet wasn't big enough to protect a set....but when he MIN-RAISES the flop you think he has a set because his bet is small?

Several things

If you read my comments on the flop action I clearly say that he could be 'feeling me out' - or maybe have a set. Obv with my specific holding im not folding but i could easy fold a middling pair to that bet. What i said was - that on the 'range' of holdings i put him on - on one of them surely has to be the set.

However, when i call he also must reasses his postion. I think if i am holding AA KK then i re raise the flop - so he can think that too. Therefore he must consider me holding the suited A or any xdxd hand.

His bet on the turn is more a c-bet bluff than a protecting bet - trying to take the pot if I am say a donkey not letting go of AKo. If he has the set - he wants to get max value whilst protecting against the flush so would bet more like 75% of the pot here - if not the whole pot given its size and the stacks.

My only problem was the river. He didnt seem to scared of the A. That was what made it a tough call as he could easy play his set for value. However, a good player could also check a set here to allow a missed flush to bluff  - or a stubbborn AK player to V bet. As I put him in the tricky/good bracket from his early activity - i decided it was a call.

I am sure against other players i could be wrong 50% of the time here - and I am not saying it is an amazing call - but i think i thought it through well.

Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6734


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2009, 07:51:58 PM »

OK

well the A kinda threw me. I went back thru the hand and decided that the turn bet wasnt enough to protect a set (which you would natrually do), and that coupled with the number of hands he had played prob gave me some show down vakue - so i called!

He had the 10. and a 7

Still not sure about my call - it just felt right at the time. I guess 50% of the time here i get shown 555

You think his turn bet wasn't big enough to protect a set....but when he MIN-RAISES the flop you think he has a set because his bet is small?

Several things

If you read my comments on the flop action I clearly say that he could be 'feeling me out' - or maybe have a set. Obv with my specific holding im not folding but i could easy fold a middling pair to that bet. What i said was - that on the 'range' of holdings i put him on - on one of them surely has to be the set.

However, when i call he also must reasses his postion. I think if i am holding AA KK then i re raise the flop - so he can think that too. Therefore he must consider me holding the suited A or any xdxd hand.

His bet on the turn is more a c-bet bluff than a protecting bet - trying to take the pot if I am say a donkey not letting go of AKo. If he has the set - he wants to get max value whilst protecting against the flush so would bet more like 75% of the pot here - if not the whole pot given its size and the stacks.

My only problem was the river. He didnt seem to scared of the A. That was what made it a tough call as he could easy play his set for value. However, a good player could also check a set here to allow a missed flush to bluff  - or a stubbborn AK player to V bet. As I put him in the tricky/good bracket from his early activity - i decided it was a call.

I am sure against other players i could be wrong 50% of the time here - and I am not saying it is an amazing call - but i think i thought it through well.

Well dude I'm not sure you've thought it through as well as you think you have. A couple of examples for you to consider. In the above post you say "he must consider me holding the suited A or any xdxd hand" Yet on the previous page you say "I also thought that if the flush came - he had no need to put me on it"....either he does or he doesn't put you on a flush draw.

Next, "If he has the set - he wants to get max value whilst protecting against the flush so would bet more like 75% of the pot here". Why would he bet 75% of the pot with a set but not bet 75% with top pair for the same reasons? Why would this guy drop his bet size to 50% of the pot with top pair? You say he prob doesn't put you on an overpair cos you would have raised the flop. So why wouldn't he bet his top pair the same way he'd bet a set to protect against your flush draw? If you can't make a distinction you can't call the river with any confidence imo. You say the bet size is because the bet is a c-bet bluff...but it isn't a bluff...he has you beat. I would be interested to know if you call his river bet "bluff" if the deuce arrives?

Next, you discount the "flushy line" on the flop because you put villain on a set or air. Your oppo had neither of those holdings. There are others as well but I don't want you to think I'm having a pop at you.
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2009, 08:38:27 PM »

Thread delivers but not in the way intended!
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2009, 08:49:29 PM »

Mantis  - what would you have put him on?

you seem to have all the answers when the hand is revealed.

you no doubt put him on 10 7.

Just to recount - i havent re read my thread but i am pretty certain that i said i gave flushys line VERY SERIOUS CONDISERATION. The reason I didnt go with it is because he wasnt laying down the set - which I had to consider he may have had - dont I?

OK - so you think i made a spewy call - thats fine. You are entitled to your opinion.

I guess the thread is more of a 'readjusting on the river thread'.


Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6734


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2009, 11:33:02 PM »

Nah dude, I don't think I have all the answers. I am interested in discussing the hand and that's why I posted my thoughts and asked some questions. It seems like you posted the hand to showcase your skillz rather than to genuinely dissect your strat...because when holes have been pointed out you've got a bit mardy about it. This is what PHA is about though. Discussion about a hand to improve one's thinking. In order to get better you really don't want everyone to applaud your call, it's no use to you, you want people to challenge the call. If you don't want people to challenge the call why post? What would you hope to learn from lots of nc posts?

FWIW I don't put the guy on 10-7. I already said I wouldn't call the river as played. The fact villain bets 1.2k into 1.5k on the end is WTF with a 10 imo. Why doesn't he check to call instead? That way he gets the very realistic missed f/d bluffing. He only gets called by better the way he's played it. And I thought villain was tricky/good? I don't think your call is spewy but it's definitely speculative imo...you can't really know where you are...and trying to pretend otherwise is only kidding yourself.
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: June 16, 2009, 12:09:18 AM »

Nah dude, I don't think I have all the answers. I am interested in discussing the hand and that's why I posted my thoughts and asked some questions. It seems like you posted the hand to showcase your skillz rather than to genuinely dissect your strat...because when holes have been pointed out you've got a bit mardy about it. This is what PHA is about though. Discussion about a hand to improve one's thinking. In order to get better you really don't want everyone to applaud your call, it's no use to you, you want people to challenge the call. If you don't want people to challenge the call why post? What would you hope to learn from lots of nc posts?

FWIW I don't put the guy on 10-7. I already said I wouldn't call the river as played. The fact villain bets 1.2k into 1.5k on the end is WTF with a 10 imo. Why doesn't he check to call instead? That way he gets the very realistic missed f/d bluffing. He only gets called by better the way he's played it. And I thought villain was tricky/good? I don't think your call is spewy but it's definitely speculative imo...you can't really know where you are...and trying to pretend otherwise is only kidding yourself.

[ ] sure posted this hand to show my skills
[ ] sure said i knew i was 100% ahead when i called

oh wait!

At no point in this thread have i said 100% i knew what he had. I even got it wrong - oh yes put those proud hand reading skills out on display for all to see!  All i have done is tried to verbalise what i thought. In my final thread I even say i believe the call is 50 50.

I wanted to hear other peoples thoughts - which you pretty much avoided till this post.


Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.119 seconds with 20 queries.