poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 20, 2025, 02:06:03 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2261786
Posts in
66596
Topics by
16984
Members
Latest Member:
thomas_1
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
The Lounge
time of the month
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
8
9
10
11
[
12
]
13
14
15
16
...
20
Author
Topic: time of the month (Read 39656 times)
cia260895
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5767
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #165 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:02:38 PM »
Being atheist my view is:
I reckon that as a religious parent you will want your child to follow the same faith as yourself although initially the child will not have a view on the type of religion he/she is brought into but when they are old enough to make a judgement themselves then let them decide and encouraged to make a decision on what gives them the right direction in life,as i see, it is never used in this way as the parental/church pressure of staying in the religion of the parents choosing is too much and no one wants to upset anyone.
now i wonder how everyone would swing if say at the age of 10/11 you had to make a decision on which way you exercise your faith and actively encouraged into this as some sort of youth coming of age decision or if you choose come out of religion altogether.
how many children of religious parents ever actually have a choice i:e We are C of E and so are you,We are Catholic and so are you,We are Jewish and so are you etc etc the choice just isn't the done thing and would be frowned upon in the different faiths,does money come into it you betcha as the church's always need financing and whats the best way of re financing this? by bringing the next wave of followers into their church.Now that might be a argumentative point of view. but is it wrong?
On the holy wars as someone previously said on here its all about my imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friend
Funny how religion causes so much anger/upset/hurt when atheism doesn't
Logged
Acidmouse
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7624
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #166 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:14:04 PM »
What primarily seems to motivate atheists isn't rationalism but anger, anger that the world isn't perfect, that someone forced them to go to church as children, that the Bible contains apparent contradictions, that human beings can be hypocrites and commit crimes in the name of faith. The vitriol is extraordinary.
Made me lol.
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #167 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM »
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #168 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:16:42 PM »
Quote from: Acidmouse on June 19, 2009, 02:14:04 PM
What primarily seems to motivate atheists isn't rationalism but anger, anger that the world isn't perfect, that someone forced them to go to church as children, that the Bible contains apparent contradictions, that human beings can be hypocrites and commit crimes in the name of faith. The vitriol is extraordinary.
Made me lol.
Acidmouse says it better and now I've posted twice on a bigusdikus thread. FML
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #169 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:22:45 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
LOL @ secularism meaning low-life chav. I think you'll actually find that most 'low-life chavs' will be part of a religion in some form or other.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
G1BTW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1393
Yes that really is me
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #170 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:23:58 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
I resent this post. I was brought up low-life secular chav, just like my parents and their parents before them. Enshrined in the values of liberty and freespeech in our country are the rights of secular chavs like me to behave how we like and dress how we like, drive what motors we like and dress them up how we like. Just because we drive cheaper motors than you and wear designer gear you don't happen to like don't mean we're of inferior intellect. I pass on my values to my girlfriends' kids and bring them up proper.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #171 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:24:01 PM »
Quote from: Acidmouse on June 19, 2009, 02:14:04 PM
What primarily seems to motivate atheists isn't rationalism but anger, anger that the world isn't perfect, that someone forced them to go to church as children, that the Bible contains apparent contradictions, that human beings can be hypocrites and commit crimes in the name of faith. The vitriol is extraordinary.
Made me lol.
What?
Atheism means the lack of a belief in a specific god or gods. No more, no less.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #172 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:24:57 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on June 19, 2009, 02:22:45 PM
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
LOL @ secularism meaning low-life chav. I think you'll actually find that most 'low-life chavs' will be part of a religion in some form or other.
This is speculative trash on both sides.
How can you say one way or the other whether 'chavs' are from religious backgrounds or not. Another reason religious debates are stupid.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Claw75
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 28410
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #173 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:27:24 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
oh dear - my daughter is in trouble then. Myself and her father have deliberately chosen to raise her without religion. We can teach her moral values without the need for religion. Atheism and humanity are not mutually exclusive. She has questions about religion, and we answer them factually. Part of that 'fact' is that god does not exist.
Logged
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #174 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:28:06 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 19, 2009, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on June 19, 2009, 02:22:45 PM
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
LOL @ secularism meaning low-life chav. I think you'll actually find that most 'low-life chavs' will be part of a religion in some form or other.
This is speculative trash on both sides.
How can you say one way or the other whether 'chavs' are from religious backgrounds or not. Another reason religious debates are stupid.
I was basing mine on the percentage of the population who attach themselves to one religion or another - based on the 2001 census. Most people in the UK are 'religious' (i.e. claim to be part of a religion). Therefore it makes sense that a cross-section of any part of society will be predominately made up of religious people. DUCY?
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6200
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #175 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:30:24 PM »
Quote from: Acidmouse on June 19, 2009, 02:14:04 PM
What primarily seems to motivate atheists isn't rationalism but anger, anger that the world isn't perfect, that someone forced them to go to church as children, that the Bible contains apparent contradictions, that human beings can be hypocrites and commit crimes in the name of faith. The vitriol is extraordinary.
Made me lol.
Aren't you making the same generalisation that people who equate religion to extremism make?
Some atheists are vitriolic and angry about their (lack of) belief.
But the majority base their arguments on reason and logic - then shut up about it.
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
kukushkin88
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3883
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #176 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:31:09 PM »
Acid your way off that anger is a motivation. Religion is a laughable concept, it's fundamentally ridiculous. Belief in a "god" is a form of insanity that for some reason is totally acceptable while other forms of insanity are recognised as being very negative and dangerous. There's no anger, i'm happy enough for people to believe what they like, I just don't understand why religion/belief in god gets treated so differently from different forms of madness.
Obviously religion has historically done significant good as well as well as great harm. I just think we should be ready by now to move on from such a fundamentally foolish concept.
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #177 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:31:49 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on June 19, 2009, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on June 19, 2009, 02:22:45 PM
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
LOL @ secularism meaning low-life chav. I think you'll actually find that most 'low-life chavs' will be part of a religion in some form or other.
This is speculative trash on both sides.
How can you say one way or the other whether 'chavs' are from religious backgrounds or not. Another reason religious debates are stupid.
I didn't assert that all chavs are secular or that all secular persuaded people are chavs. Instead I chose a specific subset - ie secular chavs, to draw my own subjective comparison with sick parents who force their children to go to Sunday school. But yr right, it is silly to debate this since my own views are just live and let live. However, I do find atheists getting het up about religion very amusing so find it hard to avoid a little tapping.
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #178 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:32:30 PM »
Quote from: Claw75 on June 19, 2009, 02:27:24 PM
Quote from: nirvana on June 19, 2009, 02:14:58 PM
If we talk about mainstream religions I can't see why atheists get so concerned about kids having a religious persuasion 'imposed' on their kids. Loving church attending parents are unlikely to leave their kids at home while they go to church. Equally they will accept their kids views if at sometime they choose not to go along with them.
I'm much more concerned that millions of kids have a low-life, secular chav persuasion imposed on them - much much harder to grow out of.
oh dear - my daughter is in trouble then. Myself and her father have deliberately chosen to raise her without religion. We can teach her moral values without the need for religion. Atheism and humanity are not mutually exclusive. She has questions about religion, and we answer them factually. Part of that 'fact' is that god does not exist.
Are you a chav ?
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
Acidmouse
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7624
Re: time of the month
«
Reply #179 on:
June 19, 2009, 02:34:31 PM »
Most parents that are considered religious want whats best for their children and faith is only a small part of creating children that are good people. Many parents give them an environment to learn about religion growing up and let them make their own minds up when they are adults.
Funny how religion causes so much anger/upset/hurt when atheism doesn't
Not heard this one before, honest.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
8
9
10
11
[
12
]
13
14
15
16
...
20
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...