Claw75
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2009, 12:15:06 PM » |
|
answers submitted. don't know whether to google check the band now, or wait with excited anticipation for the reveal!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
xxMAIRxx
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2009, 02:16:38 PM » |
|
If it is band named after a song and on my source list will be fine Claire
no idea if they are named after the song or not though! suspect not, so might have to rack the old brains a bit longer! I've changed the question to read a lil bit better, but as long as the band is named after another band's song then you are ok. 10. Name a Band named after other performers' songs
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2009, 03:05:23 PM » |
|
I know a band named after another band's album - this close enough or would it be a fail?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
Claw75
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2009, 03:34:41 PM » |
|
answers submitted. don't know whether to google check the band now, or wait with excited anticipation for the reveal!
I was impatient. wheee!!! the band took their current name from the song xxxxx from xxxxxxxxxxx's album xxxxxxxxxxxx no one else put xxxxx now, k thx!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
gatso
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2009, 03:56:05 PM » |
|
If it is band named after a song and on my source list will be fine Claire
no idea if they are named after the song or not though! suspect not, so might have to rack the old brains a bit longer! I've changed the question to read a lil bit better, but as long as the band is named after another band's song then you are ok. 10. Name a Band named after other performers' songssigh. it was going so well until you changed that question. it now makes no sense
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
xxMAIRxx
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: July 01, 2009, 04:30:38 PM » |
|
What doesn't make sense it is quite simple a band named after a song sang by another performer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: July 01, 2009, 04:36:11 PM » |
|
What doesn't make sense it is quite simple a band named after a song sang by another performer.
then you should probs change it to say that at the moment it reads 'name a band named after other performers' (plural possessive) songs (plural)' ie named after more than one song all of which have been performed by more than one performer which really doesn't make any sense at all
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
Josedinho
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2009, 04:36:52 PM » |
|
I'll probably play this one. Question 9 is your only rubbish one. The idea behind it is fair - naming a female poker player but to restrict it to a list that nobody will know is a bit rubbish. Everybody will be able to name one i'd imagine but there's no real (possible new word being created---->) aceability as knowing a more obscure player means that you are just as likely to fail as you are to be rewarded for better knowledge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
xxMAIRxx
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2009, 04:39:46 PM » |
|
What doesn't make sense it is quite simple a band named after a song sang by another performer.
then you should probs change it to say that at the moment it reads 'name a band named after other performers' (plural possessive) songs (plural)' ie named after more than one song all of which have been performed by more than one performer which really doesn't make any sense at all You make it difficult for urself question is fine
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: July 01, 2009, 04:41:42 PM » |
|
What doesn't make sense it is quite simple a band named after a song sang by another performer.
then you should probs change it to say that at the moment it reads 'name a band named after other performers' (plural possessive) songs (plural)' ie named after more than one song all of which have been performed by more than one performer which really doesn't make any sense at all You make it difficult for urself question is fine if by fine you mean nonsensical then you are correct
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
xxMAIRxx
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: July 01, 2009, 04:43:22 PM » |
|
I'll probably play this one. Question 9 is your only rubbish one. The idea behind it is fair - naming a female poker player but to restrict it to a list that nobody will know is a bit rubbish. Everybody will be able to name one i'd imagine but there's no real (possible new word being created---->) aceability as knowing a more obscure player means that you are just as likely to fail as you are to be rewarded for better knowledge.
To say it is a rubbish question is harsh I have quoted the source where the names will be checked if u want to go obscure take the risk ur choice
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
xxMAIRxx
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2009, 04:49:48 PM » |
|
What doesn't make sense it is quite simple a band named after a song sang by another performer.
then you should probs change it to say that at the moment it reads 'name a band named after other performers' (plural possessive) songs (plural)' ie named after more than one song all of which have been performed by more than one performer which really doesn't make any sense at all You make it difficult for urself question is fine if by fine you mean nonsensical then you are correct You do like to get ur opinions across and the last word in these if u don't like the question don't play and the ' was an accident and should not b there anyway
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: July 01, 2009, 05:01:01 PM » |
|
Hope your'e ready for the abuse on reveal night Mair, this is nothing!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
Claw75
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: July 01, 2009, 05:01:40 PM » |
|
I'll probably play this one. Question 9 is your only rubbish one. The idea behind it is fair - naming a female poker player but to restrict it to a list that nobody will know is a bit rubbish. Everybody will be able to name one i'd imagine but there's no real (possible new word being created---->) aceability as knowing a more obscure player means that you are just as likely to fail as you are to be rewarded for better knowledge.
I think this is fair enough, it's not as if there is a shortage of well known female players/pros around.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: July 01, 2009, 05:05:00 PM » |
|
Hope your'e ready for the abuse on reveal night Mair, this is nothing!!!!
I might be out that night. Seems like we have a qm who won't be taking any of my shit
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|