poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 20, 2025, 10:56:21 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262345
Posts in
66605
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Ruling?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
Author
Topic: Ruling? (Read 4605 times)
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Ruling?
«
on:
July 22, 2009, 02:49:39 PM »
APAT tournament at the Gala Maybury last weekend. The standard of the first dealer at the table was shocking. She insisted on moving chips from in front of players into the middle before the betting was done. This caused confusion and put me on tilt, as she refused to leave the bets where they were despite me asking her to on several occasions, one just after she'd ballsed up a pot.
Anyway, she left and a 'better' dealer arrived. He could at least work out how to check that everyone had paid their antes, and left the bets where they were until after the betting was done. However, he made one serious blunder that compounded a mistake that lead to the floor being called over to make a ruling.
In the hand in question, UTG makes a raise to 2,000. Three players fold, and the next player who has been raising relentlessly pre-flop throws in three 500 chips, and announces raise. He obviously didn't see the initial raise to 2,000. Anyway, there was some debate if he said raise before or after the chips went in. Everyone seemed to agree it was after the chips went in that he said raise. So my immediate thoughts were that he has to throw in another 500 chip and make up the call.
However, the dealer decided that it was a mistake and returned the chips whilst grabbing the players cards and dragging them into the muck. The player who raised tried to get the dealer to stop what he was doing and wanted to ask for a ruling, and the floor was called over.
What's your ruling?
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #1 on:
July 22, 2009, 02:55:55 PM »
This is dependent on the card room.
I'm not too fussed on whether he said raise first, when the chips hit, etc. It's pretty obvious he was intending to raise to 1500, so let's assume all this is fine.
I'm happy that the player has the option of doing what he likes. He may fold, he may call, or he may raise.
The question is what happens to his chips. Some card rooms will say that the chips must stay in the pot (DTD springs to mind). Others will let you take the chips back.
Ask to see the house rules. If they don't mention that chips must stay in then you can take them back.
Logged
Blue text
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #2 on:
July 22, 2009, 02:58:02 PM »
This happened to me in the £50 f/o on the sunday from the sky poker tour.
We had 2 tables left.
Woman went all in for ~10k. Kid a few positions later says "raise to 7k". He's then informed that she's already moved in. He decides to fold, but must leave his 7k in the pot. Which is fine by me as I've got AA in the big blind
Logged
Blue text
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #3 on:
July 22, 2009, 02:59:22 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 22, 2009, 02:55:55 PM
This is dependent on the card room.
I'm not too fussed on whether he said raise first, when the chips hit, etc. It's pretty obvious he was intending to raise to 1500, so let's assume all this is fine.
I'm happy that the player has the option of doing what he likes. He may fold, he may call, or he may raise.
The question is what happens to his chips. Some card rooms will say that the chips must stay in the pot (DTD springs to mind). Others will let you take the chips back.
Ask to see the house rules. If they don't mention that chips must stay in then you can take them back.
re-read op and try again imo
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
WarBwastard
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 828
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #4 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:00:04 PM »
What were the blinds? I'd make him raise the minimum. So depending on that card rooms policy, either make his bet 4,000 total or twice the initial raise. So if blinds were 300-600 for example, the UTG raise is 1400, so I'd make the guy put in 3,400.
It's his fault if he hasn't noticed there's been a raise. So once he announces raise he's obligated to raise.
Logged
http://la-boca-de-la-cueva.blogspot.com/
http://mexico.worldcupblog.org/
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." -- Bertrand Russell
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #5 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:00:42 PM »
Quote from: gatso on July 22, 2009, 02:59:22 PM
Quote from: Cf on July 22, 2009, 02:55:55 PM
This is dependent on the card room.
I'm not too fussed on whether he said raise first, when the chips hit, etc. It's pretty obvious he was intending to raise to 1500, so let's assume all this is fine.
I'm happy that the player has the option of doing what he likes. He may fold, he may call, or he may raise.
The question is what happens to his chips. Some card rooms will say that the chips must stay in the pot (DTD springs to mind). Others will let you take the chips back.
Ask to see the house rules. If they don't mention that chips must stay in then you can take them back.
re-read op and try again imo
?
I'm ignoring the end bit about the dealer trying to muck the cards. That's just daft, and I hope he was stopped before they were mucked.
Logged
Blue text
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #6 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:01:24 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 22, 2009, 03:00:42 PM
Quote from: gatso on July 22, 2009, 02:59:22 PM
Quote from: Cf on July 22, 2009, 02:55:55 PM
This is dependent on the card room.
I'm not too fussed on whether he said raise first, when the chips hit, etc. It's pretty obvious he was intending to raise to 1500, so let's assume all this is fine.
I'm happy that the player has the option of doing what he likes. He may fold, he may call, or he may raise.
The question is what happens to his chips. Some card rooms will say that the chips must stay in the pot (DTD springs to mind). Others will let you take the chips back.
Ask to see the house rules. If they don't mention that chips must stay in then you can take them back.
re-read op and try again imo
?
I'm ignoring the end bit about the dealer trying to muck the cards. That's just daft, and I hope he was stopped before they were mucked.
Nope.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #7 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:03:15 PM »
Oh. Well in that case:
a) Shoot the dealer
b) Give the player his 1500 back
c) Find a spade
d) Dig a suitable hole behind the casino
e) Put body into hole
f) Fill hole
g) Resume tournament
Logged
Blue text
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #8 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:04:14 PM »
utg raises to 2k. mp then throws in 1500. htf is that not a call? you want to give him the option to fold or raise now? wtf? have you flipped? or maybe I have? I really don't know anymore
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #9 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:04:50 PM »
Quote from: WarBwastard on July 22, 2009, 03:00:04 PM
What were the blinds? I'd make him raise the minimum. So depending on that card rooms policy, either make his bet 4,000 total or twice the initial raise. So if blinds were 300-600 for example, the UTG raise is 1400, so I'd make the guy put in 3,400.
It's his fault if he hasn't noticed there's been a raise. So once he announces raise he's obligated to raise.
this, he has announced raise so its min raise all the way
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #10 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:05:39 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 22, 2009, 03:03:15 PM
Oh. Well in that case:
a) Shoot the dealer
b) Give the player his 1500 back
c) Find a spade
d) Dig a suitable hole behind the casino
e) Put body into hole
f) Fill hole
g) Resume tournament
I agree with this though now we know the cards were mucked by the dealer
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #11 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:05:39 PM »
Quote from: phatomch on July 22, 2009, 03:04:50 PM
Quote from: WarBwastard on July 22, 2009, 03:00:04 PM
What were the blinds? I'd make him raise the minimum. So depending on that card rooms policy, either make his bet 4,000 total or twice the initial raise. So if blinds were 300-600 for example, the UTG raise is 1400, so I'd make the guy put in 3,400.
It's his fault if he hasn't noticed there's been a raise. So once he announces raise he's obligated to raise.
this, he has announced raise so its min raise all the way
Even if he says raise after he's thrown the chips in?
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
WarBwastard
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 828
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #12 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:10:12 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on July 22, 2009, 03:05:39 PM
Quote from: phatomch on July 22, 2009, 03:04:50 PM
Quote from: WarBwastard on July 22, 2009, 03:00:04 PM
What were the blinds? I'd make him raise the minimum. So depending on that card rooms policy, either make his bet 4,000 total or twice the initial raise. So if blinds were 300-600 for example, the UTG raise is 1400, so I'd make the guy put in 3,400.
It's his fault if he hasn't noticed there's been a raise. So once he announces raise he's obligated to raise.
this, he has announced raise so its min raise all the way
Even if he says raise after he's thrown the chips in?
His intention to raise is obvious enough here that I'd make him min raise.
Logged
http://la-boca-de-la-cueva.blogspot.com/
http://mexico.worldcupblog.org/
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." -- Bertrand Russell
phatomch
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1593
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #13 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:10:18 PM »
it was only the consensus that he threw the chips in before announcing raise, if you can say deffo either way it can change the ruling.
if not its a simple call
Logged
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Ruling?
«
Reply #14 on:
July 22, 2009, 03:11:26 PM »
Quote from: gatso on July 22, 2009, 03:04:14 PM
utg raises to 2k. mp then throws in 1500. htf is that not a call? you want to give him the option to fold or raise now? wtf? have you flipped? or maybe I have? I really don't know anymore
He said raise as he was throwing the chips in though. So there's 2 things we can do:
Let him reconsider his action. I'd do this. (There's then the issue of does he get chips back if he folds, but lets ignore that)
or
Hold him to a min raise.
Obviously if he just throws 3x500 in with no verbal it's a call.
Logged
Blue text
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...