|
Chompy
|
 |
« on: August 24, 2009, 12:11:29 AM » |
|
Small blind leads out for 600 on the flop. UTG+1 says nothing and throws out 2 x 500 chips.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I know we must all worship at the Church of Chomps, but statements like this are just plain ridic. He says he can't get a bet on, but we all know he can."
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2009, 12:13:14 AM » |
|
ldo
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2009, 12:14:17 AM » |
|
call, innit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2009, 12:24:47 AM » |
|
I would previously say raise. More than one chip. 50% of the required amount. TDA rule:
31. Raises
A raise must be at least the size of the previous raise. If a player puts in a raise of 50% or more of the previous bet but less than the minimum raise, he or she will be required to make a full raise. The raise will be exactly the minimum raise allowed. In no-limit and pot limit, an all-in bet of less than a full raise does not reopen the betting to a player who has already acted
That said, they released a new rule this year to clear up the more than one chip situation.
The TDA decided to release a new rule this year to clear this sort of situation up.
33. Multiple Chips
Unless a raise has been declared, placing multiple chips in the pot that add to less than double the bet one is facing will be deemed a call if removal of any one chip leaves less than the bet the player could have called.
That suggests it's a call, though the rule is a bit of a mouthful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
celtic
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2009, 12:26:20 AM » |
|
Its a call
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back  But for how long? |
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2009, 12:27:41 AM » |
|
It's a call.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Pelham Boy
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2009, 12:27:59 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The boy Gedge has written some of the best love songs of the Rock 'n' Roll Era. You may dispute this, but I'm right and you're wrong!" John Peel.
|
|
|
|
Chompy
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2009, 12:29:47 AM » |
|
I know it's a call. Just a case of whether if should be imo. CF has cleared it up with his sound knowledge of the rule book though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I know we must all worship at the Church of Chomps, but statements like this are just plain ridic. He says he can't get a bet on, but we all know he can."
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2009, 12:31:26 AM » |
|
that new rule makes no sense does it?
so if he threw out 1x1k, 1x100 and 3x25 which should clearly be a min raise it's now classed as a call because if you took out the 1k chip you're left with less than 600
not the greatest rule change in history
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Dingdell
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2009, 01:53:18 AM » |
|
I know it's a call. Just a case of whether if should be imo. Nana has cleared it up with her sound knowledge of the rule book though and excellent singing voice.
FYP. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2009, 07:41:59 AM » |
|
I know it's a call. Just a case of whether if should be imo. Nana has cleared it up with her sound knowledge of the rule book though and excellent singing voice.
FYP. sigh! i'm not wearing my glasses at dtd this time lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
Dingdell
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2009, 12:33:35 PM » |
|
I know it's a call. Just a case of whether if should be imo. Nana has cleared it up with her sound knowledge of the rule book though and excellent singing voice.
FYP. sigh! i'm not wearing my glasses at dtd this time lol Unless you've had a hair cut the Nana name stands imo. Just Nana with contacts. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MC
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2009, 03:08:09 PM » |
|
I always thought this was a raise, because he's used two chips and put in more than 50% required for a raise  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 24, 2009, 04:06:13 PM by MC »
|
Logged
|
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"@epitomised
|
|
|
|
celtic
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2009, 03:15:22 PM » |
|
Its a call
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back But for how long? |
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2009, 03:38:30 PM » |
|
I always thought this was a raise, becausee's used two chips and put in more than 50% required for a raise the strict interpretation of it under any set of rules (until that new nonsensical rule that nana's quoted) is that it's a raise but I think common sense would always come into play here as it's obv meant to be a call |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Author