poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
August 11, 2025, 11:23:51 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262835
Posts in
66615
Topics by
16992
Members
Latest Member:
Rmf22
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario (Read 2207 times)
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
on:
August 27, 2009, 11:31:02 AM »
Double or Nothing SNG, 5 paid
PokerStars Game #32108751682: Tournament #190454018, $50+$2 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2009/08/27 5:50:07 ET
Table '190454018 1' 10-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 2: SantaZzz (1600 in chips)
Seat 4: Prewie (2485 in chips)
Seat 5: DeDachs (1280 in chips)
Seat 6: Norrda (1030 in chips)
Seat 7: Konnopke (2290 in chips)
Seat 8: wudiyg (4045 in chips)
Seat 9: VK_074 (1055 in chips)
Seat 10: sibrek (1215 in chips)
SantaZzz: posts the ante 15
Prewie: posts the ante 15
DeDachs: posts the ante 15
Norrda: posts the ante 15
Konnopke: posts the ante 15
wudiyg: posts the ante 15
VK_074: posts the ante 15
sibrek: posts the ante 15
Prewie: posts small blind 75
DeDachs: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Prewie [
]
Norrda: folds
Konnopke: folds
wudiyg: folds
VK_074: raises 890 to 1040 and is all-in
sibrek: folds
SantaZzz: raises 545 to 1585 and is all-in
900 if you call and lose
The win locked up if you scoop
Your decision is?
Very tight table, but it's moving time for anyone 1500 or below in these
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #1 on:
August 27, 2009, 11:44:00 AM »
call
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #2 on:
August 27, 2009, 11:48:04 AM »
Is Santazzz tight/comptent? If so this is a clear pass, in fact i would need a read they are bad to call here.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #3 on:
August 27, 2009, 11:50:41 AM »
Quote from: Longy on August 27, 2009, 11:48:04 AM
Is Santazzz tight/comptent? If so this is a clear pass, in fact i would need a read they are bad to call here.
Not a lot of info, but nothing to suggest he is anything other than an ABC player in these
That doesn't necessarily mean he can't have 77+ A10+ but in my mind precluded anything much worse
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
EvilPie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14241
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #4 on:
August 27, 2009, 11:54:51 AM »
Quote from: Longy on August 27, 2009, 11:48:04 AM
Is Santazzz tight/comptent? If so this is a clear pass, in fact i would need a read they are bad to call here.
So what do we need to call?
I had a similar situation in a DoN recently with AK and made the laydown although we were down to 7 and I was 3rd in chips so slightly different I guess.
Is this hand only a call with KK or AA?
Logged
Motivational speeches at their best:
"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19278
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #5 on:
August 27, 2009, 12:03:55 PM »
I can't see this being a call against standard opposition, and would likely sigh before folding QQ and AKs too.
3 way action is an equity disaster
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #6 on:
August 27, 2009, 12:42:58 PM »
Quote from: EvilPie on August 27, 2009, 11:54:51 AM
Quote from: Longy on August 27, 2009, 11:48:04 AM
Is Santazzz tight/comptent? If so this is a clear pass, in fact i would need a read they are bad to call here.
So what do we need to call?
I had a similar situation in a DoN recently with AK and made the laydown although we were down to 7 and I was 3rd in chips so slightly different I guess.
Is this hand only a call with KK or AA?
Yeah kk+ looks good, queens is close and much better than calling with ak here.
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6262
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #7 on:
August 27, 2009, 12:54:10 PM »
It's def a fold in a DoN
AK is a fold too, QQ is borderline and I'd have a tough time folding it...
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #8 on:
August 27, 2009, 12:58:26 PM »
I'll fold in a double or nothing ...and quite fast as well.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #9 on:
August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM »
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #10 on:
August 27, 2009, 02:15:33 PM »
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
if you had said 5 i'd change my mind, 3? pffft, no thanks, i might know fck all about stts but untill i see some serious reallys its a call all day long
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #11 on:
August 27, 2009, 02:17:38 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on August 27, 2009, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
if you had said 5 i'd change my mind, 3? pffft, no thanks, i might know fck all about stts but untill i see some serious reallys its a call all day long
for future info TT would've got 5 reallys. there is no hand that gets 4 in this situation
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #12 on:
August 27, 2009, 02:18:32 PM »
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on August 27, 2009, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
if you had said 5 i'd change my mind, 3? pffft, no thanks, i might know fck all about stts but untill i see some serious reallys its a call all day long
for future info TT would've got 5 reallys. there is no hand that gets 4 in this situation
What about JT?
Logged
Blue text
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #13 on:
August 27, 2009, 02:21:54 PM »
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on August 27, 2009, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
if you had said 5 i'd change my mind, 3? pffft, no thanks, i might know fck all about stts but untill i see some serious reallys its a call all day long
for future info TT would've got 5 reallys. there is no hand that gets 4 in this situation
AQ suited(and it's the lucky suit you always make a flush with)?
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Jacks, Double or Nothing scenario
«
Reply #14 on:
August 27, 2009, 02:45:56 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on August 27, 2009, 02:21:54 PM
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on August 27, 2009, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: gatso on August 27, 2009, 01:53:56 PM
really, really, really easy fold. that's 3 reallys
if you had said 5 i'd change my mind, 3? pffft, no thanks, i might know fck all about stts but untill i see some serious reallys its a call all day long
for future info TT would've got 5 reallys. there is no hand that gets 4 in this situation
AQ suited(and it's the lucky suit you always make a flush with)?
if it's your lucky suit then why would it be a really, really, really, really, easy fold? it'd be a call
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...