FFS!

[AndrewT]

How about we cage children up so the paedo's can't get them?

Remember to put a blanket over the cage otherwise the paedos will still be able to see the kids and show them their winkie and that.

[thetank]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.

Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

[Longy]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.

Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

How good are you on the guitar, before I let my opinion been known on this matter.

[Scottish Dave]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

[George2Loose]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

[GreekStein]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

EL OH EL!!!!

[suzanne]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

Explain please

[Longy]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

Explain please

I think George might be saying that spending 100k on Tank playing a guitar round schools, might not be the best use of public resources.

[suzanne]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

Explain please

I think George might be saying that spending 100k on Tank playing a guitar round schools, might not be the best use of public resources.

I have not had the previlege of hearing tank play on his guitar but his idea is quite a good one imo. Kids will ignore most advise but if a message is sent in a catchy song that they will remeber then the message will stay with them.

[GreekStein]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

Explain please

I think George might be saying that spending 100k on Tank playing a guitar round schools, might not be the best use of public resources.

I have not had the previlege of hearing tank play on his guitar but his idea is quite a good one imo. Kids will ignore most advise but if a message is sent in a catchy song that they will remeber then the message will stay with them.

Can imagine it now at sunday dinner with family and friends.....

Dad: Sing that song you learnt at school this week Emma.
Emma: Bah bah black sheep have you a..
Mum: No Emma, the other one.
Emma: Just say 'NOOOO' to the PEADOOOOO, Just say NOOOOO to the PAEDOOOO la la la la

Grandma: Someone call an ambulance, I think grandad has stopped breathing

[Longy]

I can't believe there are so many Blondites on here that are willing to just let Peado's carry on as usual!......i know you'll all say ive taken all of you in the wrong way, but how else should we take your words, when you's are all dismissing introducing a simple law to try to filter these bastards out of society.

fuck it, ill jump on the band wagon too.....

'Go on sicko's, jusy keep ruining kids lives, go on, may as well cos no-one is interested in ways forward to combat what your doing'




This is a very sickening and eye opening thread to me!

The P in NSPCC does not stand for paedophile.

Protecting kids is kind of their speciality, and when they say that new legislation is a big bag of bollox, it's probably worth considering for a moment why?



Let's say I propose that my local council pays me 100 grand a year to go round schools and offices with my guitar and sing songs about how paedophillia is wrong.
Does anyone who says that this is completely ridiculous and won't achieve fuck all, is a big waste of money etc, a sympathiser of paedophillia and paedphiles and by extension a paedophile themselves?

why wouldn't that be a good idea, it would open kids eyes to peado's, a step in the right direction!

anything is better than just ignoring legislations and allowing them to carry on!

Everyone knows my views, i shall not be on this thread again, so as not to lose anymore respect for people on here.

Wow at the ignorence....

Explain please

I think George might be saying that spending 100k on Tank playing a guitar round schools, might not be the best use of public resources.

I have not had the previlege of hearing tank play on his guitar but his idea is quite a good one imo. Kids will ignore most advise but if a message is sent in a catchy song that they will remeber then the message will stay with them.

Can imagine it now at sunday dinner with family and friends.....

Dad: Sing that song you learnt at school this week Emma.
Emma: Bah bah black sheep have you a..
Mum: No Emma, the other one.
Emma: Just say 'NOOOO' to the PEADOOOOO, Just say NOOOOO to the PAEDOOOO la la la la

Grandma: Someone call an ambulance, I think grandad has stopped breathing

Lol, so funny.

[suzanne]

To get back to the original thread, there cannot be enough checks on people who are caring for our kids in schools/clubs/hospitals etc.

Most child abuse was found in the immediate family but as kids have become more aware through school etc paedophiles are obviously having to find new targets.

I think 20% could be about right.

Im guessing you guys dont have kids?

[GreekStein]

To get back to the original thread, there cannot be enough checks on people who are caring for our kids in schools/clubs/hospitals etc.

Most child abuse was found in the immediate family but as kids have become more aware through school etc paedophiles are obviously having to find new targets.

I think 20% could be about right.

Im guessing you guys dont have kids?

I haven't actually read the whole thread. Someone just showed me this bit on msn as it was ridic.

The idea of someone singing to young kids about paedophilia is just a complete no no in my eyes.

[suzanne]

To get back to the original thread, there cannot be enough checks on people who are caring for our kids in schools/clubs/hospitals etc.

Most child abuse was found in the immediate family but as kids have become more aware through school etc paedophiles are obviously having to find new targets.

I think 20% could be about right.

Im guessing you guys dont have kids?

I haven't actually read the whole thread. Someone just showed me this bit on msn as it was ridic.

The idea of someone singing to young kids about paedophilia is just a complete no no in my eyes.

Ok I see why you might think it unrealistic as it does seem a bit bizarre but its a fact that kids learn more through song than anything else. Give them a catchy tune with words and they WILL remember it.

Example...Hannah Montana is the queen of disney pop at the moment.

[Longy]

To get back to the original thread, there cannot be enough checks on people who are caring for our kids in schools/clubs/hospitals etc.

Most child abuse was found in the immediate family but as kids have become more aware through school etc paedophiles are obviously having to find new targets.

I think 20% could be about right.

Im guessing you guys dont have kids?

No i don't have kids Suzanne, I just can't imagine any parent wanting their kids to be exposed to songs about paedophilla in anyway shape or form. If there was a 100k to be spent, I would want it spent on  checks/enforcement of the law etc. Kids under the age of 10 are going to have no idea what you are talking (singing?) about and why should they? They are too young to understand and I can only see it upsetting them.

I was a school teacher for a couple of years and went through checks myself, so am aware of some of the issues. One of the first thing I was told was never put myself in a situation where any false accusation could be made. As there are hundreds upon, upon hundreds of accusations made against teachers every year of which less than 5% are found to have any grounds for punishment whatsoever.

The idea of tank getting his guitar out and playing to primary school kids, I found very amusing, as imo it is a ridiculous idea.