blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2025, 02:17:29 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262539 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  NFL playoff question
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: NFL playoff question  (Read 1811 times)
T_Mar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1443


View Profile
« on: September 17, 2009, 03:40:13 PM »

Apologies for novice question but how does the wilcard/divisional places get worked out for the NFL playoffs

I'm presuming that the winners of each division go straight to the divisional playoff... wild cards are made up of second places in the divisions?? If so where do the winners of these 2 matches fit in as would mean 10 teams?!?!
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2009, 03:42:19 PM »

Tighty is going to beat me to the answer.

kthxbye.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2009, 03:42:38 PM »

4 divisional winners

Plus the two teams from each conference with the best records


6 teams for each conference


teams with top two records get a bye week

each wild card team plays away at a division winner


in effect you have QF,SF and final for each conference, then the superbowl
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
T_Mar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1443


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2009, 03:48:45 PM »

perfect - cheers tighty (and longy, who would of answered just as clearly I'm sure!)
Logged
Matt50
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1787



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2009, 03:53:00 PM »

Tighty is going to beat me to the answer.

kthxbye.

 
Logged
smileriraq
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 144



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2009, 06:24:05 PM »

If your a Lions fan  I wouldnt worry about the playoffs!!!!!!
Logged

 Click to see full-size image.
Newportlad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1789



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2009, 06:25:25 PM »

If your a Lions fan  I wouldnt worry about the playoffs!!!!!!

If you're a Bears fan i wouldn't worry about the playoffs either!
Logged
smileriraq
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 144



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2009, 10:18:11 PM »

after the green bay game and losing two of our starting LBs one for the season and one for 6 weeks well do well to make 8-8

and dont start getting cocky mr niner fan the niners have only started to turn it around since an Ex Bear came in and shook things up
Logged

 Click to see full-size image.
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2009, 03:49:24 AM »

after the green bay game and losing two of our starting LBs one for the season and one for 6 weeks well do well to make 8-8

and dont start getting cocky mr niner fan the niners have only started to turn it around since an Ex Bear came in and shook things up

You didn't win at Lambo field, it's not the end of the season.
Your defence is still a top unit. The packers won but Aaron Rodgers didn't have the kind of game everybody thought he was going to have, he met with consistent pressure and had a tough afternoon.

Cutler is not going to throw 4 interceptions every game. If anything that game is a good omen for you guys in the quarterback position. He threw more passes that were caught 30 or more yards from the line of scrimmage in that one game than Kyle Orton did for you last year in the whole 16 game season. With that kind of weapon teams can't just play 8 men in the box all the time vs the Bears and consequently your run game gets much easier.

The only thing the bears are missing is a more experienced recieving core. I still wouldn't be surprised to see the Bears in the playoffs this year.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2009, 03:54:03 AM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
smileriraq
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 144



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2009, 10:53:59 PM »

dont misunderstand me wasnt throwing in the towel (anyone who knows me knows im a rabid bears fan)

the bears are not a top 10 defense (and havent been for a while now) they are living off their reputation more than anything , they are an average defence however now the offense is not going 3 and out all the time they arent being asked to win games by ST and Def alone

OUr Wrs are fine (something the UK bears fan club have been saying all preseason inexperienced yes but Cutler will make them better and they are picking up experience fast)

Our defense still struggles against the pass , Bowman and Tillman are solid enough but the Tampa 2 revolves around pressure and anytime we come up against a mobile QB we struggle (see seneca wallace in week 3)

The point is The vikiings and packers are decent units with less question marks and in the long run I cant see the Bears being dominant enough to win consistently our 2 wins this year has been due to the opposition missing key FGs . The good news is that the bears schedule is one of the easier ones in the league the bad news is that GB and MV have similar schedules so it will boil down to the team that manages to win the difficult games (ravens,steelers,falcons, niners) and doesnt manage to trip up against the easier games (lions ,seahawks,cleveland)

Logged

 Click to see full-size image.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 19 queries.