|
salfi
|
 |
« on: October 31, 2009, 10:15:30 AM » |
|
my mate a pro player . was attending a alea roe game and in the game was a unknown player to teh casino and myself. the villain donked out of the roe within a few orbits and wanted to play some cash. my mate busts out of the roe donking cause he knows he has to gamble as i have position on him he gos for teh run the game over method and it back fires and he busts.
anyway he gets to play the villain heads up(tthey decide between em to pay hrly rate so they dont have to pay dealer) and the guy stacks the deck and my mate loses two pair into st8 1st hand and my mate thinks nothing of it and gos to the cashier and reloads.
while he at the cage i sea the dude messing with the deck in a way isnt normal from my roe tourney but think nothing of it. anyway my mate comes to me half hour later and says to me this hand has been bugging me i lost a stack 1st hand and reload and when i get bk i lose another stack aces in pre vs jacks and the guy hit a jack. my mate says what do i think. well as i saw the guy acting dodgy with the deck i asked the staff to check teh camera and it apears the guy did load the deck.
the guy left the casino and they sed it was tough that he got screwed and that is on top of them accepting he had been cheated. is this usual practice for a casino to admit he was cheated and do nothing about it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
action man
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2009, 10:22:20 AM » |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
doubleup
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2009, 10:23:12 AM » |
|
Gambling Act 2005
42 Cheating
(1) A person commits an offence if he—
(a) cheats at gambling, or
(b) does anything for the purpose of enabling or assisting another person to cheat at gambling.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) it is immaterial whether a person who cheats—
(a) improves his chances of winning anything, or
(b) wins anything.
(3) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1) cheating at gambling may, in particular, consist of actual or attempted deception or interference in connection with—
(a) the process by which gambling is conducted, or
(b) a real or virtual game, race or other event or process to which gambling relates.
(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, to a fine or to both, or
(b) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2009, 10:25:39 AM » |
|
If the casino isn't being cheated they probably don't care I'm afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BulldozerD
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2009, 10:47:10 AM » |
|
there was something about that guy that i didn't trust from the start
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Biddy 62
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2009, 11:55:12 AM » |
|
How much ££ was involved?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2009, 11:56:08 AM » |
|
How much ££ was involved?
nothing massive, but enough to be pissed off about |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2009, 11:58:39 AM » |
|
I'm not sure what you'd expect the casino to do about it tbh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2009, 12:05:07 PM » |
|
I'm not sure what you'd expect the casino to do about it tbh
Ban him at least. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Linux
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2009, 12:13:37 PM » |
|
I'm not sure what you'd expect the casino to do about it tbh
take him out to the desert, ed deline style |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
7 seasons, 1 Promotion, 2 relegations, 3 play off exits, 1 play off bubble, 25 points deducted. we are leeds and we are back. https://twitter.com/jpmood| Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2009, 12:15:25 PM » |
|
I'm not sure what you'd expect the casino to do about it tbh
Ban him at least. If he drops money on the house games that will never happen, probably little chance anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Snatiramas
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2009, 12:19:39 PM » |
|
I have known many people barred from cardrooms for cheating......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The most insidious of rules are those that aren't rules at all.
They are the limitations that we invent for ourselves
|
|
|
|
Alverton
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2009, 12:21:59 PM » |
|
I have known many people barred from cardrooms for cheating......
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Girgy85
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2009, 12:48:43 PM » |
|
This is so com!
Why the fck would you let a guy set the cards while you were away getting money???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best poster Girgy IMO - Mantis
Girgy is my new hero! - Evilpie
Think Girgy has shown the best leopard instincts in this thread and would prob survive best in the wild. Eye of the tiger that fella - Mantis
Girgy is a m'fkn machine - Daveshoelace
|
|
|
|
Snatiramas
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2009, 12:52:23 PM » |
|
This is so com!
Why the fck would you let a guy set the cards while you were away getting money???
Just can't trust anyone |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The most insidious of rules are those that aren't rules at all.
They are the limitations that we invent for ourselves
|
|
|
|
Author