blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 08:43:45 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262357 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Did DTD make a bad ruling?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Did DTD make a bad ruling?  (Read 5802 times)
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« on: February 21, 2010, 01:19:51 PM »

I think they did...

We're on the turn in a hand, the details of which are irrelevant.

Player A bets 2100.

Player B announces raise and throws in 2500 (2x1000, 1x500) then a further 4000 (4x1000).

Floor rule this as a min raise.


Seems a pretty clear raise to 6500 to me. Something about the 2500 being more than the 2100 required to call. He didn't have any change obv otherwise he'd have put in 2100.
Logged

Blue text
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2010, 01:24:41 PM »

spot on ruling imo


Player A bets 2100.

Player B announces raise and throws in 2500 (2x1000, 1x500)

that is a min raise. anything he does after that is irrelevant, he's already minraised
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 34178



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2010, 01:26:41 PM »

I agree ... Count your chips out behind the line and put the lot in at once, it aint difficult ffs.

really tilts me when players announce "raise", then put the call in and dwell for ages trying to decide how much to raise.

Correct ruling.
Logged

Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done

http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/


kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2010, 01:27:13 PM »

spot on ruling imo


Player A bets 2100.

Player B announces raise and throws in 2500 (2x1000, 1x500)

that is a min raise. anything he does after that is irrelevant, he's already minraised

But how is this a min raise? If you announce raise beforehand you can make two movements into the pot. The first to call and the second to put the raise amount in.

How is 2500 considered a min raise over the 2100? In any other situation this would be a clear cut call.
Logged

Blue text
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8081



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2010, 01:27:38 PM »

I agree ... Count your chips out behind the line and put the lot in at once, it aint difficult ffs.

really tilts me when players announce "raise", then put the call in and dwell for ages trying to decide how much to raise.

Correct ruling.

yeah it tilts me too lol, just not convinced that the raise shouldn't have stood.
Logged

Blue text
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2010, 01:33:05 PM »


But how is this a min raise? If you announce raise beforehand you can make two movements into the pot. The first to call and the second to put the raise amount in.

How is 2500 considered a min raise over the 2100? In any other situation this would be a clear cut call.

ignore the second movement. if you say raise then put an amount of more than a call but less than a raise in the middle then it's a min raise, never a call

do what you like after that, put more chips in, stand in the middle of the table doing a banana dance, I really don't care, it's not going to change the fact that you just did a minraise
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2010, 01:34:06 PM »

correct ruling


what would be the time penalty for standing in the middle of the table doing a banana dance please?
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2010, 01:36:56 PM »

depends if you touch the pot with your banana feet. that would be a 1 rounder, just doing the dance without disturbing anything is probs just a warning for a first offence
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Dewi_cool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9972


Dusk Till Dawn - It's like going home


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2010, 01:56:44 PM »

ruling is good
Logged

The very last hand of the night goes to Dewi James, who finds ACES and talks Raymond O’Mahoney into calling his all-in preflop bet of 15k.  “If I had AQ, I’d call!” says Dewi.  Raymond calls holding pocket 66’s.


The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17074


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2010, 02:00:09 PM »

Ruling is wrong imo.

As long as the guy clearly said "raise" before putting the 2500 in I think it's pretty obvious his intent is to call the 2100 and raise 4000.

To the letter of the law the ruling might be correct, but common sense should overrule any rule in poker imo.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 34178



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2010, 02:02:32 PM »

The raiser should be given a 74 round penalty for being too stupid to just say "Raise to 6100 total"
Logged

Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done

http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/


kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10018


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2010, 02:02:59 PM »

what would be the time penalty for standing in the middle of the table doing a banana dance please?


you'd be my hero sir. that's enough!
Logged
EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14241



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2010, 04:24:18 PM »

Ruling is wrong imo.

As long as the guy clearly said "raise" before putting the 2500 in I think it's pretty obvious his intent is to call the 2100 and raise 4000.

To the letter of the law the ruling might be correct, but common sense should overrule any rule in poker imo.

How do we know his intention wasn't to call the 2100 and raise 4400?

I don't think his intention is clear at all.

Does he now want 400 change from his call? Or is the change from his raise?
Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14241



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2010, 04:25:36 PM »

I agree ... Count your chips out behind the line and put the lot in at once, it aint difficult ffs.

really tilts me when players announce "raise", then put the call in and dwell for ages trying to decide how much to raise.

Correct ruling.

I often do this. Thanks for confirming that my action is tilting. I was worried that I might be wasting my time.
Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2010, 04:26:50 PM »

How is 2500 considered a min raise over the 2100? In any other situation this would be a clear cut call.

example please of one of these any other situations in which saying raise before putting in chips is a clear cut call
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 20 queries.