blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 16, 2025, 11:05:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262946 Posts in 66616 Topics by 16993 Members
Latest Member: jobinkhosla
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Will you be voting at the upcoming elections?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Will you be voting at the upcoming elections?
Yes, definitely
Yes, probably
Don't know
No, probably not
No, definitely not
No, I can't vote

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 ... 16 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Will you be voting at the upcoming elections?  (Read 30542 times)
thediceman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile
« Reply #105 on: April 14, 2010, 01:42:43 PM »

Just heard the libdems on the radio

Legalise cannabis - I like
Bring home troops - I like
Increase tax- Good plan

Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?

Have i missed something or is the statement above a complete pile of shite?

Not shite, I love the idea of Amsterdam style coffee shops in Ipswich.
Logged

StuartHopkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8145


Ocho cinco


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: April 14, 2010, 01:49:23 PM »

Just heard the libdems on the radio

Legalise cannabis - I like
Bring home troops - I like
Increase tax- Good plan

Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?

Have i missed something or is the statement above a complete pile of shite?

Not shite, I love the idea of Amsterdam style coffee shops in Ipswich.

Lol no legalising Cannabis completely would be immense!

Im on about the fact she thinks people who earn £15k pay more tax proportionally than those who earn £150k
Logged

Only 23 days to go until the Berlin Marathon! Please sponsor me at www.virginmoneygiving.com/StuartHopkin
thediceman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile
« Reply #107 on: April 14, 2010, 01:54:14 PM »

Just heard the libdems on the radio

Legalise cannabis - I like
Bring home troops - I like
Increase tax- Good plan

Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?

Have i missed something or is the statement above a complete pile of shite?

Not shite, I love the idea of Amsterdam style coffee shops in Ipswich.

Lol no legalising Cannabis completely would be immense!

Im on about the fact she thinks people who earn £15k pay more tax proportionally than those who earn £150k

I knew that's what you meant, I'm just to stoned to care 
Logged

StuartHopkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8145


Ocho cinco


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: April 14, 2010, 02:02:08 PM »

Just heard the libdems on the radio

Legalise cannabis - I like
Bring home troops - I like
Increase tax- Good plan

Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?

Have i missed something or is the statement above a complete pile of shite?

Not shite, I love the idea of Amsterdam style coffee shops in Ipswich.

Lol no legalising Cannabis completely would be immense!

Im on about the fact she thinks people who earn £15k pay more tax proportionally than those who earn £150k

I knew that's what you meant, I'm just to stoned to care 

Good times
Logged

Only 23 days to go until the Berlin Marathon! Please sponsor me at www.virginmoneygiving.com/StuartHopkin
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #109 on: April 14, 2010, 02:17:47 PM »

Just heard the libdems on the radio

Legalise cannabis - I like
Bring home troops - I like
Increase tax- Good plan

Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?

Have i missed something or is the statement above a complete pile of shite?

Not shite, I love the idea of Amsterdam style coffee shops in Ipswich.

Lol no legalising Cannabis completely would be immense!

Im on about the fact she thinks people who earn £15k pay more tax proportionally than those who earn £150k

No idea what was said, do you have a link?

One thing that I was wondering about the Lib Dem MPs, were there a far smaller percentage of them involved in the expenses scandal than the other parties or not?  I'd suspect that it was the case (but could be completely wrong).  Anyone know?
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #110 on: April 14, 2010, 04:50:29 PM »


Poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people?


It's misleadingly worded. Income in tax is not the same as income tax.

The calculation takes into account all tax, not just income tax and national insurance, but also council tax, road tax, VAT on utilities, food and argos furniture. Special duty in addition to the VAT on booze, fags and petrol.

It's a nice pithy statement, but the way the numbers work, it's always going to be true that poor people pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than rich people, even if the lib dems got in.

That is unless you want to charge "rich people" an income tax rate of 90%+. Check selected countries in the continent of Africa to see how this works.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2010, 04:52:11 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Pawprint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1055



View Profile
« Reply #111 on: April 14, 2010, 05:07:31 PM »

I think the best thing that could happen is we get a hung parliament and we all vote in by text to pick a dream team to get the country out of the mess it's in.

Portfolio LabourConservativesLib Dems
Prime MinisterGordon Brown MPDavid Cameron MP Nick Clegg MP
Chancellor of the ExchequerAlistair Darling MPGeorge Osborne MP Dr Vince Cable MP
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs David Miliband MPWilliam Hague MP Edward Davey MP
Secretary of State for Justice Jack Straw MPDominic Grieve QC MP David Howarth MP
Secretary of State for the Home Department Alan Johnson MPChris Grayling MP Chris Huhne MP
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Hilary Benn MPNick Herbert MP Tim Farron MP
Secretary of State for International Development Douglas Alexander MPAndrew Mitchell MP Michael Moore MP
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government John Denham MPCaroline Spelman MP Julia Goldsworthy MP
Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families Ed Balls MPMichael Gove MP David Laws MP
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Ed Miliband MPGreg Clark MP Simon Hughes MP
Secretary of State for Health Andrew Burnham MPAndrew Lansley CBE MP Norman Lamb MP
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Yvette Cooper MPTheresa May MP Prof. Steve Webb MP
Secretary of State for Defence Bob Ainsworth MPDr. Liam Fox MP Nick Harvey MP
Secretary of State for Transport The Lord Adonis PCTheresa Villiers MP Norman Baker MP
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Ben Bradshaw MPJeremy Hunt MP Don Foster MP

Possibly others in contention aswell, but sorting the three main parties was easy.

Anyone got any preferences ?
Logged

Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: April 14, 2010, 05:12:25 PM »

Got to have Ken Clarke in there imo.

Logged
thediceman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile
« Reply #113 on: April 14, 2010, 05:26:41 PM »

Is a hung parliamnet really the best option when we are in a period where we really need a strong government to address many complex issues and make big decisions if we are to address the economic problems ?.

Logged

Pawprint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1055



View Profile
« Reply #114 on: April 14, 2010, 05:35:29 PM »

Is a hung parliamnet really the best option when we are in a period where we really need a strong government to address many complex issues and make big decisions if we are to address the economic problems ?.



I just don't feel any of the contenders have what it takes to get things sorted.  Now, if they were forced to have to all work together, instead of just having a go at each other, we might get things moving in the right direction.
Logged

Bongo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8824



View Profile
« Reply #115 on: April 14, 2010, 05:37:03 PM »

Is a hung parliamnet really the best option when we are in a period where we really need a strong government to address many complex issues and make big decisions if we are to address the economic problems ?.



I just don't feel any of the contenders have what it takes to get things sorted.  Now, if they were forced to have to all work together, instead of just having a go at each other, we might get things moving in the right direction.

They'd just have bigger arguments and nothing would get done.
Logged

Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: April 14, 2010, 05:43:58 PM »

The last time there was a hung parliment in this country in 74' they called another election later the same year to sort it out.

Logged
Jon MW
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6203



View Profile
« Reply #117 on: April 14, 2010, 06:29:34 PM »

Is a hung parliamnet really the best option when we are in a period where we really need a strong government to address many complex issues and make big decisions if we are to address the economic problems ?.



I just don't feel any of the contenders have what it takes to get things sorted.  Now, if they were forced to have to all work together, instead of just having a go at each other, we might get things moving in the right direction.

They'd just have bigger arguments and nothing would get done.

Yeah, this - they wouldn't be forced to work together at all, which means the main parties would just work against each other as they always do

The most likely outcome is another election in Autumn, failing that one or two of the smaller parties would give one of the main parties a working majority in exchange for a policy or two that they'd never get through if they didn't have the leverage.

But overall, I don't think there'll be a hung parliament anyway.
Logged

Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield

2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #118 on: April 14, 2010, 06:45:59 PM »


One thing that I was wondering about the Lib Dem MPs, were there a far smaller percentage of them involved in the expenses scandal than the other parties or not?  


Useful visual representation.



Smaller percentage is defo true, but whether to throw the word far in there depends on whether you like the libdems or not.
Personally I think it's a bit hypocritical of them to try and make so much meat out of the expenses scandal in their campaign literature. It's not like they're squeaky clean and let's not forget one of the mediumly dark yellow dots is Nick Clegg who had to pay back a grand that he spent getting his garden done.

Another area where Libdems don't fair so well on expenses is if you look at the average expenses claimed per MP in the year 2008/2009. This is real term expenses both legit and dodgy.

£151,000 each for Libdem MPs compared to £146,500 for Labour and £138,000 for the Torys.
(To be fair, this might be a lot to do with London based MPs needing less in travel expenses and there being less libdems in London, I dunno tbh)
Personally I think the numbers are close enough to make no real difference, it's just that the LibDems are disingenous to campaign on the other parties claiming lots of expenses when it's them who are claiming the most.

« Last Edit: April 14, 2010, 06:56:11 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
thediceman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile
« Reply #119 on: April 14, 2010, 07:09:31 PM »


One thing that I was wondering about the Lib Dem MPs, were there a far smaller percentage of them involved in the expenses scandal than the other parties or not?  


Useful visual representation.



Smaller percentage is defo true, but whether to throw the word far in there depends on whether you like the libdems or not.
Personally I think it's a bit hypocritical of them to try and make so much meat out of the expenses scandal in their campaign literature. It's not like they're squeaky clean and let's not forget one of the mediumly dark yellow dots is Nick Clegg who had to pay back a grand that he spent getting his garden done.

Another area where Libdems don't fair so well on expenses is if you look at the average expenses claimed per MP in the year 2008/2009. This is real term expenses both legit and dodgy.

£151,000 each for Libdem MPs compared to £146,500 for Labour and £138,000 for the Torys.
(To be fair, this might be a lot to do with London based MPs needing less in travel expenses and there being less libdems in London, I dunno tbh)
Personally I think the numbers are close enough to make no real difference, it's just that the LibDems are disingenous to campaign on the other parties claiming lots of expenses when it's them who are claiming the most.



Nice charts, you must of spent hours doing that  Grin

The others % is bigger than you would have thought. Is there is breakdown for this group. Was it the Welsh or Scots who nicked the most  Grin
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 ... 16 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.21 seconds with 22 queries.