Back to back hands vs JaffaCake in WSOP satty

[NigDawG]

this is from ipoker $100r satty, post rebuy stage. not many runners and a small overlay so only 1 seat. around 20 ppl left im 2/20. jaffa has only joined the table 2-3 hands ago neither of us have played a hand and but we've played quite abit before.

hand 1:

blinds 40/80. i open the co w/TT to 200 out of 13k stack. jeff peels the button out of 5k stack and blinds fold.

flop  i elect to check. villain bets 320, i call.

turn  we both check

river  i lead 960 into 1.1k villain raises to 3520 leaving 1k back

pretty sure my line is shit on every street here. really disappointed with how i played it


hand 2:

very next hand. i open the hijack with KK to 200 and jeff calls the cutoff. the sb calls too covering both of us.

flop  sb checks i bet 400 into 680, jeff insta calls sb folds.

turn  i bet 1200, he calls again pretty quickly.

river  i bet 2640 into 3.8k, villain shoves for 7.4k

upto river this is obv std, at the time i was thinking i could get called really light here because of history, my reputation and what just happened the last hand. felt i could get looked up by Ax/5x/pp's. it's complicated because while he obv has Jx a fair bit i'm kicking myself when he checks back those hands i feel i can get value from :/

flame away

[GreekStein]

Chris edit this imo because we know from the first hand you called and lost which will affect people's thinking imo.

Hand 2 I check/call the river.

[pleno1]

i guess he doubled up through you in hand 1, to be able to shove for 7.5k in hand two.

but i think just putting him in for extra 1k/calling is fine. could easily of flopped a set, checked turn to get 2 streets of value. if he bets 99 does he 100% bet turn?

[NigDawG]

meh uv both referred to it now so no point editing

people should try and think about hands regardless of the results anyway, any1 who doesn't is doing it wrong

[GreekStein]

meh uv both referred to it now so no point editing

people should try and think about hands regardless of the results anyway, any1 who doesn't is doing it wrong

welcome to blonde.

Mantis will now tell you to fold hand 1

[Sack it off]

I shove on hand 1. I played hand with him once where he VB 4 card Q high flush and folded to a shove obv knowing I don't shove with less than his hand. So based on the face I know he is perfectly capable of committing himself and folding I'm happy to think I'm always ahead

[mondatoo]

meh uv both referred to it now so no point editing

people should try and think about hands regardless of the results anyway, any1 who doesn't is doing it wrong

This is so true,the Tikay style of Hand Analysis' is by far the best way imo,unless your laptop breaks midway through then people get a bit tetchy

[Cottonbud]

Hand 1 I call. If he has luckboxed KJ pretty much FYL you beat the rest of his entire range.

Hand 2 I'd just check fold. He surely folds hearts on the turn so you beat nothing on the river imo.

[Ironside]

hand one i shove the only hand beating you is KJ (if he had qq i will eat my hat)
hand two check fold river they always have it here IMHO

[the rage]

hand 1-UL.
hand 2-i would check the river. As previous poster said, you are unlikely to be called by a hand that you are beating.

[MANTIS01]

Hand 1 - I would cbet, not sure why you don't. Check turn with intention of calling. Check jam river.
Hand 2 - Check-call

[810ofclubs]

sigh fold hand 1

sigh fold hand 2, love the line thou

[buzzharvey22]

i think ur line is fine in hand 2, bet folding river is best imooo. with ur aggro image ur gunna get flatted by any pair probs, but some of these he may just check behind, so ur getting more value by betting rather than checking i think.

[Dubai]

Snap fold both. It's not close either, just annoying spots.

[outragous76]

Snap fold both. It's not close either, just annoying spots.

we get alot of these spots posted where the good players on here will bet fold a river (and I understanmd the logic). Does that not become really exploitable?