blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 01:07:37 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  2nd hand on fimal table - interesting 3 way pot - critique all 3 players
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 2nd hand on fimal table - interesting 3 way pot - critique all 3 players  (Read 3367 times)
Lucky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile WWW
« on: June 28, 2010, 03:27:30 PM »

Live MTT £100 buy in.  10,000 starting stack. Only 22 runners (World Cup impact)

2nd hand of 10 handed final table. Average stack is 22,000 and blinds are 300/600/50

I'm in SB with c 30,000

BB has c 38,000

Seat 10 has c 20,000

Limped to me in Small Blind, I make up with K7 and BB checks.

Flop is KK9, 2 spades.

I check, BB (a strong player, capable of making moves) leads for 1,000 and seat 10 a very accomplished deep thinking player, raises to 4,000. What should I do and why?

(I'll post turn and river cards and action later and will be interested in views on all 3 players).
Logged
NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20204


Enchantment? Enchantment!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2010, 03:29:08 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.
Logged

GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2010, 04:04:12 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.

^^This but that's not hugely helpful without explanation...

You can't raise because you turn your hand into a bluff.

You can't fold because our hand is too strong. Live players can be raising hands as bluffs here, raising to find out whether their pair or 9 is good (lol - it happens!)

I'm not expecting to get bluffed on the turn because our hand now looks so strong.
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Lucky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2010, 04:52:53 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.

^^This but that's not hugely helpful without explanation...

You can't raise because you turn your hand into a bluff.

You can't fold because our hand is too strong. Live players can be raising hands as bluffs here, raising to find out whether their pair or 9 is good (lol - it happens!)

I'm not expecting to get bluffed on the turn because our hand now looks so strong.


I expected the fold pre comment.  I think making up the small blind may be a leak in my game, but is it really all that bad calling 300 into a pot of 2,000 (blinds, antes and one limp)?
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2010, 04:57:21 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.

^^This but that's not hugely helpful without explanation...

You can't raise because you turn your hand into a bluff.

You can't fold because our hand is too strong. Live players can be raising hands as bluffs here, raising to find out whether their pair or 9 is good (lol - it happens!)

I'm not expecting to get bluffed on the turn because our hand now looks so strong.


I expected the fold pre comment.  I think making up the small blind may be a leak in my game, but is it really all that bad calling 300 into a pot of 2,000 (blinds, antes and one limp)?

Reverse implied odds.

This hand is a good example actually, we basically flop one of the best hands we could and still could be wayyyy behind as there are a lot kx hands that could be in either players hand.

Logged
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7126


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2010, 10:54:11 PM »


..Limped to me in Small Blind, .....

...seat 10 a very accomplished deep thinking player, ....


Does the accomplished deep thinking player limp a lot?  

Have limpers normally been isolated at the table/in the tourney?
« Last Edit: June 28, 2010, 10:56:02 PM by doubleup » Logged
silverslick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2010, 11:15:12 PM »

If first player can make moves his range is wide. The deep thinking player should know this, would he raise to take it away? I can' t see a reason to fold trips. You either call or raise. A better king is possible so i call here.
Logged
Lucky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2010, 10:15:41 AM »


..Limped to me in Small Blind, .....

...seat 10 a very accomplished deep thinking player, ....


Does the accomplished deep thinking player limp a lot?    No

Have limpers normally been isolated at the table/in the tourney?  Not really but this is a new final table.

Logged
Lucky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2010, 10:21:10 AM »

If first player can make moves his range is wide. The deep thinking player should know this, would he raise to take it away? I can' t see a reason to fold trips. You either call or raise. A better king is possible so i call here.

This was my thinking entirely. BB could be taking a stab, representing strength on a paired board. The 2nd player is good enough to know this and raise to take it away. Given this, I felt a call would  be best.

BB now has a long dwell, trying to get a read from me and seeming genuinely puzzled as to what we may have. I now think he may have the other king.

The Turn is a Jack.  What do I do now and why ?
Logged
the rage
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2010, 11:28:20 AM »

I would check again. Then i would re-assess depending on the action. Either the BB or seat 10 may have been betting the flush and / or straight draw. I'm thinking that seat 10, putting a fair amount of his stack in may have had a very strong draw, such as QJ suited, or maybe just the NFD. Either way, i would check and await the response from the two other combatants.
Logged
Lucky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2010, 12:20:18 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.

^^This but that's not hugely helpful without explanation...

You can't raise because you turn your hand into a bluff.

You can't fold because our hand is too strong. Live players can be raising hands as bluffs here, raising to find out whether their pair or 9 is good (lol - it happens!)

I'm not expecting to get bluffed on the turn because our hand now looks so strong.


I expected the fold pre comment.  I think making up the small blind may be a leak in my game, but is it really all that bad calling 300 into a pot of 2,000 (blinds, antes and one limp)?

Reverse implied odds.

This hand is a good example actually, we basically flop one of the best hands we could and still could be wayyyy behind as there are a lot kx hands that could be in either players hand.



Thanks for the reply and point taken.  Should we generally be more worried about the reverse implied odds (especially if dominated) than we are by the (to me) enticing 7-1 pot odds?

Should we fold all weak SB hands or just those in danger of being dominated - ie is (say) 6 7 a better call than K 7 - or are they both easy folds?
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2010, 01:40:54 PM »

Fold pre. Flat now.

^^This but that's not hugely helpful without explanation...

You can't raise because you turn your hand into a bluff.

You can't fold because our hand is too strong. Live players can be raising hands as bluffs here, raising to find out whether their pair or 9 is good (lol - it happens!)

I'm not expecting to get bluffed on the turn because our hand now looks so strong.


I expected the fold pre comment.  I think making up the small blind may be a leak in my game, but is it really all that bad calling 300 into a pot of 2,000 (blinds, antes and one limp)?

Reverse implied odds.

This hand is a good example actually, we basically flop one of the best hands we could and still could be wayyyy behind as there are a lot kx hands that could be in either players hand.



Thanks for the reply and point taken.  Should we generally be more worried about the reverse implied odds (especially if dominated) than we are by the (to me) enticing 7-1 pot odds?

Should we fold all weak SB hands or just those in danger of being dominated - ie is (say) 6 7 a better call than K 7 - or are they both easy folds?

alan (good to meet you too btw - sorry forgot to say that)

As a default you should be folding, however if i have  a suited connector or suited 1 gapper getting 7:1 im finding it difficult to fold. Your point about domintaed holdings is very vaild thou
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
NigDawG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1374



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2010, 02:02:43 PM »

i fold pre and fold the flop as played
Logged

Christopher Brammer
EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14241



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2010, 02:13:54 PM »

i fold pre and fold the flop as played

This is why NigDawG's the best.
Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2010, 02:29:29 PM »

i fold pre and fold the flop as played

This is why NigDawG's the best.

Why do you fold the flop Chris?
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.142 seconds with 19 queries.