Apology to Tikay.

[turny]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

lol so can we have a look round in your private life please keith just in case we find some dirt to dish on you? if not no harm done aye?

[Claw75]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

part of the problem is, because neither Jane herself nor anyone else that might be 'in the know' have said, is that we have no idea whether Jane was looking through Kev's computer for something specific and happened across the other information, or whether she was just having a general snoop.  In fact, that's not really part of the problem, it's irrelevant imo.  If Jane thought Kev's computer, which was in her possession, potentially contained evidence that might be useful for a police investigation, she should have contacted the police, rather than compromising her position as a moderator of the forum by looking at many members personal messages to Kev, as well as stuff outside of blonde.

[thetank]

If Jane were to voluntarily resign as mod, it would make things a lot easier. This is not going away, this thread will get out of control and get locked and there will be another one next week. The healing process has not yet begun.

Personally I think the case for forcibly de modding isn't as strong as some suggest, but it might be a good thing for her to stand down voluntarily.

Kev not posting for a while also a good thing for the forum. Would be nice if he could do this without the indignity of a ban.

[henrik777]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

part of the problem is, because neither Jane herself nor anyone else that might be 'in the know' have said, is that we have no idea whether Jane was looking through Kev's computer for something specific and happened across the other information, or whether she was just having a general snoop.  In fact, that's not really part of the problem, it's irrelevant imo.  If Jane thought Kev's computer, which was in her possession, potentially contained evidence that might be useful for a police investigation, she should have contacted the police, rather than compromising her position as a moderator of the forum by looking at many members personal messages to Kev, as well as stuff outside of blonde.

I agree up to rather.

Sandy

[The Camel]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

part of the problem is, because neither Jane herself nor anyone else that might be 'in the know' have said, is that we have no idea whether Jane was looking through Kev's computer for something specific and happened across the other information, or whether she was just having a general snoop.  In fact, that's not really part of the problem, it's irrelevant imo.  If Jane thought Kev's computer, which was in her possession, potentially contained evidence that might be useful for a police investigation, she should have contacted the police, rather than compromising her position as a moderator of the forum by looking at many members personal messages to Kev, as well as stuff outside of blonde.

This part is definitely true.

[Claw75]

If Jane were to voluntarily resign as mod, it would make things a lot easier. This is not going away, this thread will get out of control and get locked and there will be another one next week. The healing process has not yet begun.

Personally I think the case for forcibly de modding isn't as strong as some suggest, but it might be a good thing for her to stand down voluntarily.

Kev not posting for a while also a good thing for the forum. Would be nice if he could do this without the indignity of a ban.

pretty much this.  Jane is an intelligent woman - she must realise why she should not continue as a moderator and I'm surprised she didn't voluntarily offer her resignation when this first came out (unless she has and it's just not been addressed).

[The Camel]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

lol so can we have a look round in your private life please keith just in case we find some dirt to dish on you? if not no harm done aye?

There is quite a huge difference between all and sundry looking at your computer, and your ex partner, don't you think?

[henrik777]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

lol so can we have a look round in your private life please keith just in case we find some dirt to dish on you? if not no harm done aye?

There is quite a huge difference between all and sundry looking at your computer, and your ex partner, don't you think?

Damn rumour mill, wrong again.

Sandy

[outragous76]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

lol so can we have a look round in your private life please keith just in case we find some dirt to dish on you? if not no harm done aye?

There is quite a huge difference between all and sundry looking at your computer, and your ex partner, don't you think?

not when she is holding a gun and a mega phone no!

[turny]

I just feel people may have got their priorities somewhat confused here.

If Jane found evidence that might help a criminal case be closed I think that proves her actions were justified.

lol so can we have a look round in your private life please keith just in case we find some dirt to dish on you? if not no harm done aye?

There is quite a huge difference between all and sundry looking at your computer, and your ex partner, don't you think?

no i dont think tbh, an ex partner is just that an ex so in my opinion has no more right to look than anyone else.
 a persons personal space should be that and shouldnt be invaded by anyone including there partner.
so just be me to have a look then keith? not all and sundry that ok?

[Bongo]

I'm not sure how Ginger can be defended. She invaded the privacy of Kev, and everyone else who has ever sent an email, pm or had a conversation with him. The fact that she found something incriminating is irrelevant to that fact. Personally, I have likely sent pms to Kev that I wouldn't want read, but there's a good chance they were, and for that person to continue as a mod is pretty disgraceful and a poor reflection on a community that I used to hold in such high regard.

Is there evidence to suggest that she looked at anything aside from chat logs?

[turny]

I'm not sure how Ginger can be defended. She invaded the privacy of Kev, and everyone else who has ever sent an email, pm or had a conversation with him. The fact that she found something incriminating is irrelevant to that fact. Personally, I have likely sent pms to Kev that I wouldn't want read, but there's a good chance they were, and for that person to continue as a mod is pretty disgraceful and a poor reflection on a community that I used to hold in such high regard.

Is there evidence to suggest that she looked at anything aside from chat logs?

as far as im aware it was chatlogs and emails (she deleted a number so must have had access) so i wouldnt be suprised if it was pm's too


maybe jane can confirm herself otherwise?

[Bongo]

I'm not sure how Ginger can be defended. She invaded the privacy of Kev, and everyone else who has ever sent an email, pm or had a conversation with him. The fact that she found something incriminating is irrelevant to that fact. Personally, I have likely sent pms to Kev that I wouldn't want read, but there's a good chance they were, and for that person to continue as a mod is pretty disgraceful and a poor reflection on a community that I used to hold in such high regard.

Is there evidence to suggest that she looked at anything aside from chat logs?

as far as im aware it was chatlogs and emails (she deleted a number so must have had access) so i wouldnt be suprised if it was pm's too


maybe jane can confirm herself otherwise?

Does that mean there was, as far as you are aware, no evidence that she had read PMs?

[The Camel]

I dunno, maybe my values are fcked up, but I really can't see there is much comparison between someone watching a video of a sexual assault and doing nothing about it and someone looking through an expartners chat files.

[turny]

I'm not sure how Ginger can be defended. She invaded the privacy of Kev, and everyone else who has ever sent an email, pm or had a conversation with him. The fact that she found something incriminating is irrelevant to that fact. Personally, I have likely sent pms to Kev that I wouldn't want read, but there's a good chance they were, and for that person to continue as a mod is pretty disgraceful and a poor reflection on a community that I used to hold in such high regard.

Is there evidence to suggest that she looked at anything aside from chat logs?

as far as im aware it was chatlogs and emails (she deleted a number so must have had access) so i wouldnt be suprised if it was pm's too


maybe jane can confirm herself otherwise?

Does that mean there was, as far as you are aware, no evidence that she had read PMs?

no im not aware of evidence of this  (others maybe aware)though it would be much easier to hide especially if in a position of power on the site the pms are sent