|
gouty
|
 |
« on: October 06, 2010, 01:13:08 PM » |
|
ok i understand rooney FG and man u 1-0 is related and odds cut accordingly. how about this?
633 runner poker tourny
a woman on final table 6/1
winner is over 30 at 7/2
the bet has copped for 4725 euro and the bookie reckons they are related tried to pay me 2850 which i refused.
opinions please?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2010, 01:21:15 PM » |
|
Absolutely outrageous.
How the eff can that be related?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2010, 01:23:32 PM » |
|
Which tournament was this?
7/2 about a 30+ winner for any live tournament is ridic value.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
doubleup
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2010, 01:26:59 PM » |
|
Absolutely outrageous.
How the eff can that be related?
If all the women entrants were over 30? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AndrewT
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2010, 01:28:57 PM » |
|
Was this the 'Geeky Internet Kidz and their Mums' EPT side event?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2010, 01:29:44 PM » |
|
Absolutely outrageous.
How the eff can that be related?
If all the women entrants were over 30? that would make the 6/1 worse value though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
ACE2M
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2010, 01:36:29 PM » |
|
on the face of it its fine but a lot of bookies go singles only about anything like that.
more detail req
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2010, 01:39:11 PM » |
|
Ladbrokes tourney in Killarney Keith, a couple people I know had bets on those markets too.
I think they were told that the 10 handed final which Val made wasn't the official final and for the purpose of the bet it was 9 places.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gouty
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2010, 01:52:20 PM » |
|
10 final from 9 was 10p r4 which is fair enough.
if the whole final table was ladies only the over 30 market prices would not be affected imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gouty
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2010, 02:29:20 PM » |
|
keith i sent you a pm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2010, 02:34:44 PM » |
|
100% they are related unless the % of men and women over/under 30 is exactly the same
but it's gonna be pot luck whether it benefits you or the bookie and to pay out that much less is outrageous
have you asked them for their reasoning?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
gouty
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 06, 2010, 02:47:35 PM » |
|
100% they are related unless the % of men and women over/under 30 is exactly the same
but it's gonna be pot luck whether it benefits you or the bookie and to pay out that much less is outrageous
have you asked them for their reasoning?
may i ask for your reasoning? where is the relation? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
StuartHopkin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 06, 2010, 02:54:40 PM » |
|
100% they are related unless the % of men and women over/under 30 is exactly the same
but it's gonna be pot luck whether it benefits you or the bookie and to pay out that much less is outrageous
have you asked them for their reasoning?
may i ask for your reasoning? where is the relation? His reasoning is that you may have known that proportionally theyre were more over 30's women than men |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ACE2M
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2010, 02:55:18 PM » |
|
Did you place it online? if yes then they should man up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2010, 02:59:12 PM » |
|
100% they are related unless the % of men and women over/under 30 is exactly the same
but it's gonna be pot luck whether it benefits you or the bookie and to pay out that much less is outrageous
have you asked them for their reasoning?
may i ask for your reasoning? where is the relation? the actual odds of the double change with each new entrant depending on their age and gender. no way the bookies can allow for that though however if they look back once entry is closed and see a lot more over 30s/women/both they may feel they're justified in making a deduction. not that I agree it's right as they'd def not do it the other way if less over 30s or women bought in |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Author