I dont really see why so many people are "not in love with the hand" on the flop, we have a flush in no limit holdem and our opponent has lead (and we all agree his range to lead includes a LOT of hands that dont beat a flush yes?)
I think any thought process on the flop that governs getting to a "cheap showdown" or that considers any move not engineered exclusively for value is a pretty massive leak.
As played I call flop, call turn, call river. And with info provided I cant think of any reason to do much different, given how under-repped your hand is.
If the river is a brick like an offsuit 4 or something Id either be raise calling or flatting again, this would depend on how many semi-bluffs (bet folds) I give his range, and exactly how tight I think he ACTUAL value range is. If he can have bet/fodling hands like pair/decent heart hands then id likely just peel peel and try get a third barrell (or a super thin Vbet) off him on the end, if I don't put those hands in his range often enough then depending on how wide he's stacking off/bet calling for value I would either flat again or raise/call, obv the wider he is bet calling the more likely I am to raise, whereas if his range is really tight I'll prolly nit it up and just call call or call/vbet river when checked to (on pretty much any non heart river)
Didn't use the word fold once in that whole post lol, for good reason
Author