blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 22, 2025, 01:41:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262365 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  tedious ruling thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: tedious ruling thread  (Read 2208 times)
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2011, 02:09:32 PM »

If he doesnt already have an oversized chip in (ie. has 100chip in for his 100small blind) then I'd say all options open as tapping the table means fuck all. If he has a 500 chip in for his small blind at 100/200, then tapping the table means call so he has to call the 200.

Agree with the one with blue-blood.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
JK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2565


Probably the worst player here


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2011, 02:21:15 PM »

Dunno if its been said, but imo:

Checking in this situation is totally irrelevant. He doesnt have a check option, therefore it isnt binding to an action.

When someone calls pot in a no limit game, the dealer should just lol and say try again. However, if they say "raise the pot", then its binding to a raise, as they said raise, even though they still said pot.

Id call it as all options open, allin stands
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.026 seconds with 20 queries.