poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 22, 2025, 04:50:49 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262370
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Twitter Footballer
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
Author
Topic: Twitter Footballer (Read 11603 times)
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #15 on:
May 21, 2011, 08:11:01 PM »
Quote from: AndrewT on May 21, 2011, 07:30:35 PM
I didn't think there was any one who still didn't know who it was.
not only do I not know who it is I don't even know what you're all talking about
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Sack it off
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 896
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #16 on:
May 21, 2011, 08:15:12 PM »
Rob Green?
Logged
rossfourfive
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1135
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #17 on:
May 21, 2011, 08:48:57 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 07:48:26 PM
Just in case there is any doubt, No mention of the actual name of the footballer or any of the other individuals suspected or known to have superinjunctions currently running please, on a public blonde thread
Really?
I'm not sure I get these super injunctions. I thought he took one out against Imogen Thomas and the press, not the general public?
What happens if I saw the footballer and Imogen hooking up but wasn't aware of the super injunction. Am I then liable to be sued if I start posting it online and telling everyone I meet?
I'm a big fan of the footballer in question but he's fighting a losing battle with this, everyone knows, give up and save yourself some cash. Firmly in the super injunction the super injunctions camp.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #18 on:
May 21, 2011, 08:58:28 PM »
Quote from: rossfourfive on May 21, 2011, 08:48:57 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 07:48:26 PM
Just in case there is any doubt, No mention of the actual name of the footballer or any of the other individuals suspected or known to have superinjunctions currently running please, on a public blonde thread
Really?
I'm not sure I get these super injunctions. I thought he took one out against Imogen Thomas and the press, not the general public?
What happens if I saw the footballer and Imogen hooking up but wasn't aware of the super injunction. Am I then liable to be sued if I start posting it online and telling everyone I meet?
I'm a big fan of the footballer in question but he's fighting a losing battle with this, everyone knows, give up and save yourself some cash. Firmly in the super injunction the super injunctions camp.
I agree with the general point, he's wasting his money. Its widely known through search engines and the overseas press. Just man up. We saw with Andrew Marr the whole thing turns counter-productiver
As to the first point any media outlet that breaks the super injunction is in theory liable, a UK based poker forum included. We're the meeja, in a wider legal context, and we allow you to post....
Just don't fancy risking it, that's all, which I am sure you understand
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #19 on:
May 21, 2011, 09:49:35 PM »
lawyer for the footballer demands Twitter handover every a/c name mentioning affair with the girl!!
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15837
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #20 on:
May 21, 2011, 09:54:37 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 09:49:35 PM
lawyer for the footballer demands Twitter handover every a/c name mentioning affair with the girl!!
That's stupid, its going to spread like wildfire now, there will millions of mentions by the time they have all finished. Rage against the machine 'n all that.........
Logged
rossfourfive
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1135
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #21 on:
May 21, 2011, 09:55:39 PM »
Quote from: Woodsey on May 21, 2011, 09:54:37 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 09:49:35 PM
lawyer for the footballer demands Twitter handover every a/c name mentioning affair with the girl!!
That's stupid, its going to spread like wildfire now, there will millions of mentions by the time they have all finished. Rage against the machine 'n all that.........
Agreed. Ridiculous, give up mate.
Logged
Waz1892
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2377
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #22 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:00:32 PM »
Must be an another reason why he's going through with it all and now at these lengths. He and his missus must have had the discussion, she can't be that stupid or blind to what is all over the net.
So what's the point in denying it any longer, if the person he's trying to keep it from must now know anyway, so who's he trying to keep it a secret from if not her and family?
Or is image more important to said person?!
Logged
Carpe Diem
Jon MW
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6202
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #23 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:04:08 PM »
Quote from: rossfourfive on May 21, 2011, 09:55:39 PM
Quote from: Woodsey on May 21, 2011, 09:54:37 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 09:49:35 PM
lawyer for the footballer demands Twitter handover every a/c name mentioning affair with the girl!!
That's stupid, its going to spread like wildfire now, there will millions of mentions by the time they have all finished. Rage against the machine 'n all that.........
Agreed. Ridiculous, give up mate.
I
think
The media outlets that are reporting the twitter story are breaking the super injunction - because they mean that nobody can report on the fact that an injunction exists; by reporting the twitter story they are reporting that such an injunction exists.
The perfectly valid defence to this is that they are allowed to if it is already in the public domain
But if they were the ones who put it into the public domain to start with (via twitter) then the defence falls apart and they can be sued.
I think that's what the current action is aiming to achieve - I don't think anyone is trying to keep a lid on the story, they're working out who to sue.
Logged
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 41932
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #24 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:05:01 PM »
knowing imogens history he is probably scared the video will come out
Logged
I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
henrik777
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2664
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #25 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:12:30 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 08:58:28 PM
Quote from: rossfourfive on May 21, 2011, 08:48:57 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 07:48:26 PM
Just in case there is any doubt, No mention of the actual name of the footballer or any of the other individuals suspected or known to have superinjunctions currently running please, on a public blonde thread
Really?
I'm not sure I get these super injunctions. I thought he took one out against Imogen Thomas and the press, not the general public?
What happens if I saw the footballer and Imogen hooking up but wasn't aware of the super injunction. Am I then liable to be sued if I start posting it online and telling everyone I meet?
I'm a big fan of the footballer in question but he's fighting a losing battle with this, everyone knows, give up and save yourself some cash. Firmly in the super injunction the super injunctions camp.
I agree with the general point, he's wasting his money. Its widely known through search engines and the overseas press. Just man up. We saw with Andrew Marr the whole thing turns counter-productiver
As to the first point any media outlet that breaks the super injunction is in theory liable, a UK based poker forum included. We're the meeja, in a wider legal context, and we allow you to post....
Just don't fancy risking it, that's all, which I am sure you understand
Not really since no announcement has been made as to who has an injunction against who and what can or can't be said. The injunction wasn't made against me unless they forgot to tell me in which case how can i break it ?
Sandy
Logged
ripple11
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6313
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #26 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:13:04 PM »
Quote from: rossfourfive on May 21, 2011, 08:48:57 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on May 21, 2011, 07:48:26 PM
Just in case there is any doubt, No mention of the actual name of the footballer or any of the other individuals suspected or known to have superinjunctions currently running please, on a public blonde thread
Really?
I'm not sure I get these super injunctions. I thought he took one out against Imogen Thomas and the press, not the general public?
What happens if I saw the footballer and Imogen hooking up but wasn't aware of the super injunction. Am I then liable to be sued if I start posting it online and telling everyone I meet?
I'm a big fan of the footballer in question but he's fighting a losing battle with this, everyone knows, give up and save yourself some cash. Firmly in the super injunction the super injunctions camp.
Good point....in theory nobody even knows an injuction exists!!....so if you report you saw X with Y....how can you get into trouble??
Anyway back to the real football world,did anyone catch Football Focus today........ what do we think of "Michael Vaughan the interviewer"!!??
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #27 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:13:21 PM »
its quite funny
this apparently all started when she asked him for 100k to stay schtum - reports are that the legal costs to do this are circa 50k
therefore you could argue that the silence sum should be 50k - and get them to sign something to that effect??
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Teacake
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2526
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #28 on:
May 21, 2011, 10:45:52 PM »
Quote from: gatso on May 21, 2011, 08:11:01 PM
Quote from: AndrewT on May 21, 2011, 07:30:35 PM
I didn't think there was any one who still didn't know who it was.
not only do I not know who it is I don't even know what you're all talking about
It must be tearing you apart.
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Twitter Footballer
«
Reply #29 on:
May 21, 2011, 11:03:02 PM »
Quote from: Teacake on May 21, 2011, 10:45:52 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 21, 2011, 08:11:01 PM
Quote from: AndrewT on May 21, 2011, 07:30:35 PM
I didn't think there was any one who still didn't know who it was.
not only do I not know who it is I don't even know what you're all talking about
It must be tearing you apart.
well I know now. took about 3 seconds on google. how on earth can anyone who knew that this story existed not manage to find out who it was about?
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
5
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...