blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 14, 2025, 03:08:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262230 Posts in 66603 Topics by 16988 Members
Latest Member: Jengajenga921
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Large fields
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Large fields  (Read 4013 times)
JP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 363


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2006, 08:05:31 PM »

I like playing in large fields.
Last week I came in final 3 tables of pokerstars $200 with a field of over 3500.

I do not play these expecting to win, many times i go out in the first couple of hours. But when we were down to 50 I liked my chances and if a couple of key pots had gone my way I would have had a very good chance of winning the $150,000 1st prize. But the prize I got covers 15 weeks worth of buy ins so i will keep playing them. My friend got 11th in the $500 a few weeks back and had a HUGE coinflip to go out, 1st prize in this one was $190,000. To win you are going to need to play well and get lucky numerous times (this includes NOT getting unlucky).
I say if you can afford these then play them but don't expect an immediate return and if you go out early then don't be too disappointed. When I get that far again I like my chances of winning the whole thing.

And another point try the satellites to get in cheaply for them, I probably buy in a bit too often but last week I got a seat for $22 and won $3000

People say the skill factor diminishes with such a huge field, is that such a bad thing?? Some of the players who play these tournaments are high limit players and lots of very good pros play these tournaments, as much as we like to think how good we are there are often numerous players in a tournament with more experience and a higher skill level.

Adjust to the game conditions and there is a chance of winning big for a relatively low buy in as M3Boy says. I play these for fun as a break from my usual limit games.

Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2006, 10:39:57 PM »

 

Cheers for that JP, now post more bloody often!
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2006, 10:46:24 PM »


People say the skill factor diminishes with such a huge field, is that such a bad thing?? Some of the players who play these tournaments are high limit players and lots of very good pros play these tournaments, as much as we like to think how good we are there are often numerous players in a tournament with more experience and a higher skill level.


Very modest paragraph in a 
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
portfolio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1119


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2006, 02:37:51 AM »

I like playing in large fields.
Last week I came in final 3 tables of pokerstars $200 with a field of over 3500.

I do not play these expecting to win, many times i go out in the first couple of hours. But when we were down to 50 I liked my chances and if a couple of key pots had gone my way I would have had a very good chance of winning the $150,000 1st prize. But the prize I got covers 15 weeks worth of buy ins so i will keep playing them. My friend got 11th in the $500 a few weeks back and had a HUGE coinflip to go out, 1st prize in this one was $190,000. To win you are going to need to play well and get lucky numerous times (this includes NOT getting unlucky).
I say if you can afford these then play them but don't expect an immediate return and if you go out early then don't be too disappointed. When I get that far again I like my chances of winning the whole thing.

i totally agree.

the huge multiple return on investment  rewards players exponentially, i feel.

mixed with other lower runner mtts,its not hard to make a GOOD living from mtts.


 for fun as a break from my usual limit games.      ok     now that   i cant believe tho


Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47378



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2006, 02:46:42 AM »

I play mostly MTTs but I find I do best in the ones with bigger buy ins, longer clocks and smaller fields

I don't mind anything up to 200 runners but prefer around 100

The problem with big fields is the number of times you will have to put all your chips at risk before you make the money

Even if you are a 4/1 favorite every time the odds are stacked against you if you do it too often
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2006, 03:30:34 AM »

I don't do MTT too often as the beats at critical times upset me. Playing them for a living I believe requires mental strength that I don't yet possess. I admire all those that do. The larger the field the bigger the variance, the luck factor might have you making nothing for months if you only play huge comps, I couldn't deal with this.

I play STT for steady money and to keep me far from tilt. Beats never bother me there.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2006, 03:32:51 AM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 07, 2014, 02:54:55 AM »

Anyone know if flushy has played any huge 500+ runner fields since? #lottery #onlyforrecreationalplayers.
Logged
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 07, 2014, 11:46:28 AM »

Hahaha great bump.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2014, 12:13:23 PM »

Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 07, 2014, 12:40:13 PM »

Cliffs?
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: January 07, 2014, 12:43:38 PM »

Cliffs?

Flushy haz braselet now.

Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 07, 2014, 12:46:32 PM »

I was assuming he'd won something the other night online?

Either way, taking seven years to win a comp is quite a wait
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 07, 2014, 12:57:57 PM »

haha incred bumpage
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
action man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10650



View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: January 07, 2014, 01:52:54 PM »

JP coming on with the brags!
Logged
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7124


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 07, 2014, 06:41:07 PM »


Ahhh 2006 - I thought I lived in an orchard of money trees
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.157 seconds with 20 queries.