worst hand we jam for value?

[pleno1]

***** Hand History for Game 1111111111 ***** (On Game)
$200.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, March 21, 11:14:23 ET 2012
Table Guilin (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Seat 3: Player3 ( $59.50 USD ) - VPIP: 26, PFR: 22, 3B: 4, AF: 0.0, Hands: 46
Seat 4: Player4 ( $110.00 USD ) - VPIP: 31, PFR: 14, 3B: 3, AF: 3.0, Hands: 83
Seat 7: Player7 ( $650.99 USD ) - VPIP: 21, PFR: 16, 3B: 6, AF: 1.0, Hands: 266
Seat 9: Hero ( $200.00 USD ) - VPIP: 35, PFR: 29, 3B: 14, AF: 2.5, Hands: 26519
Player7 posts small blind [$1.00 USD].
Hero posts big blind [$2.00 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [  x  x ]
Player3 folds
Player4 folds
Player7 raises [$5.00 USD]
Hero raises [$14.00 USD]
Player7 calls [$10.00 USD]
** Dealing Flop ** [ , , ]
Player7 checks
Hero bets [$16.00 USD]
Player7 calls [$16.00 USD]
** Dealing Turn ** [ ]
Player7 checks
Hero bets [$40.00 USD]
Player7 calls [$40.00 USD]
** Dealing River ** [ ]
Player7 checks
Hero bets [$128.00 USD]

[Dubai]

8 s is probably my thinnest. Think I'd check back hands containing 6 s

[Honeybadger]

8 s is probably my thinnest. Think I'd check back hands containing 6 s

At 200NL this might be a little thin cos the average multi-tabling reg is folding too much in these spots. Which obviously means you can get really out of line with your bluffing here. Your experience might differ of course, and also it depends on your image etc. I would probably jam the for value, check back lower spades, and consider jamming the entire rest of my range as a bluff. This would obviously be terrible if someone knew what I was doing, but it'll likely work at 200NL and below vs average multi-tabling regs.