poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 27, 2025, 08:05:49 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262483
Posts in
66609
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
One for the MTT wizards
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: One for the MTT wizards (Read 2832 times)
TL900
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2418
One for the MTT wizards
«
on:
June 16, 2012, 09:14:39 AM »
PokerStars Hand #82003504612: Tournament #571440725, $15.00+$1.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (40/80) - 2012/06/15 23:13:57 WET [2012/06/15 18:13:57 ET]
Table '571440725 21' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: poochings1 (4846 in chips)
Seat 2: funkjel (2387 in chips)
Seat 3: nala1988 (4379 in chips)
Seat 4: 007zigzag (1390 in chips)
Seat 5: Mt.Spewmore (2410 in chips)
Seat 6: xmeteorox (6060 in chips)
Seat 7: UncaJ5 (2575 in chips)
Seat 8: SteveCap74 (4280 in chips)
Seat 9: StarlingC (2738 in chips)
SteveCap74: posts small blind 40
StarlingC: posts big blind 80
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Mt.Spewmore [
]
poochings1: folds
funkjel: raises 105 to 185
nala1988: folds
007zigzag: calls 185
OR is a reg playing 26/18, 13% EP open over just short of 500 hands, flatter is a splashy fish. Really not sure what is optimal here. Also if we place antes in, what are we doing? 88/TT in this scenario also?
Added to OP : 6% 3bet 43% fold to 3bet 13% 4bet (1/8) sample so not all that helpful
«
Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 10:28:53 AM by TL900
»
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
LonOhRay
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 486
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #1 on:
June 16, 2012, 09:36:10 AM »
edit
Misread stack sizes, and fish has 17 bigs
«
Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 10:21:37 AM by LonOhRay
»
Logged
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 574
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #2 on:
June 16, 2012, 09:49:24 AM »
Do you reallt think you have set mining odds here? Think i'm either jamming or folding, 30bb, with ante's i'm leaning towards a shove too. Got a feeling I could be wrong here, interesting spot, wwyd witha suited Ax hand or AT+?
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
TL900
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2418
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #3 on:
June 16, 2012, 09:54:15 AM »
Quote from: LonOhRay on June 16, 2012, 09:36:10 AM
any 3 bet stats over the 500 hands?
6% 3bet 43% fold to 3bet 13% 4bet (1/8) sample so not all that helpful
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
the rage
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 380
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #4 on:
June 16, 2012, 10:20:14 AM »
I would go for the set mining option here
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
Online
Posts: 6262
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #5 on:
June 16, 2012, 10:27:12 AM »
I think flat calling is bad. Prefer folding to flatting.
Looks like a 3b/fold vs reg, 3b/call vs the fish.
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
PutYouOnAK/AQ
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 90
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #6 on:
June 16, 2012, 11:04:10 AM »
Yeah this is pretty akward, stack sizes are a complete nightmare. I think call or fold are optimal here. 3bet/folding to the reg would be bad here because of stack sizes, and as he's a reg we're not in good shape vs his pre ante opening range as it is. (which makes shoving pointless because we're crushed when he calls and the fish is probably going to fold anyway.
We defo don't have odds to set mine but we're not set mining if we call we're just playing the hand in position.
Logged
DMorgan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4440
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #7 on:
June 16, 2012, 04:16:26 PM »
Quote from: MC on June 16, 2012, 10:27:12 AM
I think flat calling is bad. Prefer folding to flatting.
Looks like a 3b/fold vs reg, 3b/call vs the fish.
+1
Logged
Quote from: Karabiner on May 24, 2014, 12:47:13 PM
Is Dan awake yet?
TL900
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2418
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #8 on:
June 16, 2012, 04:37:32 PM »
I assume dan and james do the same with 88? What about TT/JJ?
What does adding antes do to this spot?
fwiw, i think flatting is the worst option also.
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
MC
Super
Hero Member
Online
Posts: 6262
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #9 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:24:17 PM »
Quote from: TL900 on June 16, 2012, 04:37:32 PM
I assume dan and james do the same with 88? What about TT/JJ?
What does adding antes do to this spot?
fwiw, i think flatting is the worst option also.
I guess 88 is essentially the same hand but I'm getting more into folding territory with eights.
TT I probs play the same except it's more of a sigh fold to the reg, JJ I guess we can 3b/call against the reg.
I don't think antes make a huge difference as I still don't think they make shoving pre the best option.
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #10 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:37:04 PM »
Quote from: PutYouOnAK/AQ on June 16, 2012, 11:04:10 AM
Yeah this is pretty akward, stack sizes are a complete nightmare. I think call or fold are optimal here. 3bet/folding to the reg would be bad here because of stack sizes, and as he's a reg we're not in good shape vs his pre ante opening range as it is. (which makes shoving pointless because we're crushed when he calls and the fish is probably going to fold anyway.
We defo don't have odds to set mine but we're not set mining if we call we're just playing the hand in position.
You can't assume that just because he is a "reg" that he has a really tight opening range to the point where there are no viable aggressive options with 99 playing 30bbs. There are lots of different types of regs; some who open a lot, some who don't etc. and you'll end up making lots of mistakes in mtts by pigeon holing someone as a generic "reg" with no reads and simply assuming that they are only opening 99+ AJ+ for example (although in general it is better to lean on the tighter side if it's a marginal spot)
I can't do the maths because I'm on my phone, but I think it'd be difficult for a shove to not show a profit here. The fish adds dead money and can easily call/call with worse hands (AK-AJ, 66-88) and probably only has TT/JJ that beats us. The opener won't be opening absurdly light out of 30bbs pre antes if he is a thinker but without reads you can safely assume he's opening KQ/KJss, QJss, 66-AA, AK-AT and possibly some random other slightly light opens.
I'm not entirely sure if piling is the best option, but my instinct is that it will show a profit, and I think we are FAR too shallow to peel since our hand plays poorly 3 way this shallow because we don't have the implied for when we make a 9. If it folded to us on the btn or co we could probably whip out the peel but in this spot I think we should pile or fold.
Thoughts?
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #11 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:48:20 PM »
It's a fold for me unless I'm tilted when I obv jam!
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Junior Senior
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4628
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #12 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:48:32 PM »
I probs just get it in here. What is the avg stack? Your shove will look a bit squeezy so may get called off light. I'm with nittendencies here that a shove in this spot overall shows a profit. Plus its a $15 MTT so if yiu are wrong you only lose €15 or have i got the wrong attitude?! :-)
Logged
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #13 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:50:16 PM »
Quote from: MC on June 16, 2012, 05:24:17 PM
Quote from: TL900 on June 16, 2012, 04:37:32 PM
I assume dan and james do the same with 88? What about TT/JJ?
What does adding antes do to this spot?
fwiw, i think flatting is the worst option also.
I guess 88 is essentially the same hand but I'm getting more into folding territory with eights.
TT I probs play the same except it's more of a sigh fold to the reg, JJ I guess we can 3b/call against the reg.
I don't think antes make a huge difference as I still don't think they make shoving pre the best option.
88 isn't the same hand at all because there is one less hand that the fish can call/call with that we beat and one more hand that the reg can call with that beats us (although he probably doesn't call that often with 99 but calls a non 0% of the time) which really negatively affects our equity.
And no offence James, but how can you say that antes wouldn't affect our decision? If there are antes then we win more money when we get folds, improving our win rate. Also antes might open up the fish's calling range which improves our overall equity.
Also, I don't think that the reg will think we have much of a 3bet/fold range here with no dynamic so what do you think about ripping JJ to try and rep a capped range vs the reg, or do you think we lose too much value from when the fish peels our 3bet and/or spazz shoves?
«
Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 05:52:17 PM by Nit Tendencies
»
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
TL900
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2418
Re: One for the MTT wizards
«
Reply #14 on:
June 16, 2012, 05:58:59 PM »
Quote from: Junior Senior on June 16, 2012, 05:48:32 PM
I probs just get it in here. What is the avg stack? Your shove will look a bit squeezy so may get called off light. I'm with nittendencies here that a shove in this spot overall shows a profit. Plus its a $15 MTT so if yiu are wrong you only lose €15 or have i got the wrong attitude?! :-)
The average stack is completley irrelevant imo, and I don't understand why so many people put so much weight behind our stack in relation to the average. (not just talking about you obv) the amount of bb's is the only thing you should be concerned with and how to approach each action given your stack size.
And yes, this is the wrong attitude imo, I want to make the best possible decision in every hand of every tournament I play, to improve not only my winrate/ROI but my overall game aswell.
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...