poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 01, 2024, 05:33:20 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272828
Posts in
66757
Topics by
16723
Members
Latest Member:
callpri
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Another interesting ruling from WSOP
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Author
Topic: Another interesting ruling from WSOP (Read 7462 times)
owen1923
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 72
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #15 on:
July 16, 2012, 07:26:37 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 06:28:39 PM
Quote from: owen1923 on July 16, 2012, 06:27:13 PM
Her action had been taken away from her,
she wasn't given the opportunity to make the call.
It may appear fair to the guy making the mistake, but it was the complete opposite to the utg.
She was also not given the opportunity to fold to the all-in.
You are quite right, but at least she should have been given the opportunity. An opportunity that was through no fault of her own denied her.
My view is that all the benefits of this decision fell for the all in guy.
He put all of his chips into the pot, he mucked his own cards, he was given most of his chips back, he forfeited 2BB, when if fact it should have been a minimum of 3. He made the mistake and got the benefits of the decision.
She lost all ability to continue in the hand, which indirectly impacts on the remaining players as well.
Logged
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #16 on:
July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM »
I must be wrong then
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #17 on:
July 16, 2012, 07:40:56 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
I'd expect a bit more from someone who advertises card room manager in their signature. How would you now rule, giving the opinions expressed here?
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #18 on:
July 16, 2012, 07:44:20 PM »
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 07:40:56 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
I'd expect a bit more from someone who advertises card room manager in their signature. How would you now rule, giving the opinions expressed here?
LOL Exactly the same as Jack Effel as I think I have explained
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
I KNOW IT
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3234
I'm the one the right ;)
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #19 on:
July 16, 2012, 07:49:46 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
You are not
Logged
You have to expect things of yourself before you can do them." "Heart is what separates the good from the great. '
"All money is good, just the quantity makes it better"
My Dad
"Poker Players and Vultures are alike. They both live off the flesh of the weak"
Tony Bolto
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8089
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #20 on:
July 16, 2012, 08:45:01 PM »
Ruling seems fine to me.
To those that say you could angle shoot... Yes, of course you can. This is where we use our discretion. If we suspect there has been angle shooting then we can rule differently.
Logged
Blue text
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #21 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:08:17 PM »
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:44:20 PM
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 07:40:56 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
I'd expect a bit more from someone who advertises card room manager in their signature. How would you now rule, giving the opinions expressed here?
LOL Exactly the same as Jack Effel as I think I have explained
So no penalty for the player, sigh, maybe there is a need for that new book on the rules of poker. The 'I must be wrong' statement wasn't meant to be taken literally then, was hoping from some insight into the thoughts and details taken into account when making this kind of decision, especially in the biggest (well 2nd now in money), tournament in the world.
Personally I believe it was the right decision in this case, but not warning the player and issuing a penalty, why would the TD not do that?
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16591
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #22 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:22:43 PM »
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 09:08:17 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:44:20 PM
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 07:40:56 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
I'd expect a bit more from someone who advertises card room manager in their signature. How would you now rule, giving the opinions expressed here?
LOL Exactly the same as Jack Effel as I think I have explained
So no penalty for the player, sigh, maybe there is a need for that new book on the rules of poker. The 'I must be wrong' statement wasn't meant to be taken literally then, was hoping from some insight into the thoughts and details taken into account when making this kind of decision, especially in the biggest (well 2nd now in money), tournament in the world.
Personally I believe it was the right decision in this case, but not warning the player and issuing a penalty, why would the TD not do that?
He made another big error yesterday and was given a one round penalty.
From under the gun, Andras Koroknai raised to an unknown amount and Fabrizio Gonzalez reraised from the next seat to 305,000. Play folded back to Koroknai and he moved all in for approximately 2.4 million. According to Paul Volpe, Gonzalez asked for a count, but Koroknai thought he said call and turned his hand over to reveal the
. The floor was called and it was ruled that Koroknai would be given a one-round penalty. Gonzalez folded his hand.
This is the second big mistake Koroknai has made deep in the 2012 World Series of Poker Main Event. Yesterday, he missed action in front of him and moved all in when he didn't see Gaelle Baumann raise before mucking his hand before she had acted. No penalty was given then. This time around, he'll have to sit out for the next orbit.
Read more:
http://www.pokernews.com/live-reporting/2012-world-series-of-poker/event-61-no-limit-hold-em-main-event/day6/chips.38860.htm
«
Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 09:26:53 PM by Doobs
»
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8089
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #23 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:29:33 PM »
Warn the player what exactly? They will have already realised they messed up. They've lost some chips. Don't really see the need for further action in this instance, though I wouldn't argue it had a penalty been given either.
Logged
Blue text
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #24 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:30:53 PM »
Quote from: Doobs on July 16, 2012, 09:22:43 PM
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 09:08:17 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:44:20 PM
Quote from: jackinbeat on July 16, 2012, 07:40:56 PM
Quote from: dik9 on July 16, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
I must be wrong then
I'd expect a bit more from someone who advertises card room manager in their signature. How would you now rule, giving the opinions expressed here?
LOL Exactly the same as Jack Effel as I think I have explained
So no penalty for the player, sigh, maybe there is a need for that new book on the rules of poker. The 'I must be wrong' statement wasn't meant to be taken literally then, was hoping from some insight into the thoughts and details taken into account when making this kind of decision, especially in the biggest (well 2nd now in money), tournament in the world.
Personally I believe it was the right decision in this case, but not warning the player and issuing a penalty, why would the TD not do that?
He made another big error yesterday and was given a one round penalty.
From under the gun, Andras Koroknai raised to an unknown amount and Fabrizio Gonzalez reraised from the next seat to 305,000. Play folded back to Koroknai and he moved all in for approximately 2.4 million. According to Paul Volpe, Gonzalez asked for a count, but Koroknai thought he said call and turned his hand over to reveal the
. The floor was called and it was ruled that Koroknai would be given a one-round penalty. Gonzalez folded his hand.
This is the second big mistake Koroknai has made deep in the 2012 World Series of Poker Main Event. Yesterday, he missed action in front of him and moved all in when he didn't see Gaelle Baumann raise before mucking his hand before she had acted. No penalty was given then. This time around, he'll have to sit out for the next orbit.
Read more:
http://www.pokernews.com/live-reporting/2012-world-series-of-poker/event-61-no-limit-hold-em-main-event/day6/chips.38860.htm
Kind of makes my point, doesn't always work giving penalties as some people just don't learn, or like to continue angle shooting, but maybe a penalty after the first error would have made for a more thoughtful player. Seems like poker karma paid him a visit here though.
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #25 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:33:15 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 16, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
Warn the player what exactly? They will have already realised they messed up. They've lost some chips. Don't really see the need for further action in this instance, though I wouldn't argue it had a penalty been given either.
To take more notice about what's going on of course. And to make it clear his mistake could have cost him all his chips, and he wouldn't be so lucky next time. I feel the french lady got the raw deal here and she did nothing wrong, if she was holding KK that is.
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8089
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #26 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:33:58 PM »
There you go. Penalty for the 2nd offence. Seems fair enough to me. Amy more offences increase the penalty or dq if appropriate.
Logged
Blue text
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16591
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #27 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:39:08 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 16, 2012, 09:33:58 PM
There you go. Penalty for the 2nd offence. Seems fair enough to me. Amy more offences increase the penalty or dq if appropriate.
Seems fair to me too. Two sensible rulings.
Losing all his chips through a first error seems a little dispropotionate. I suppose jackinbeat is right though, if he had lost all his chips on the first error, he wouldn't have made the second.
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
jackinbeat
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 616
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #28 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:40:15 PM »
Quote from: Cf on July 16, 2012, 09:33:58 PM
There you go. Penalty for the 2nd offence. Seems fair enough to me. Amy more offences increase the penalty or dq if appropriate.
Fair enough, they got their eventually. Did you have to bring my ex Amy into this though...
Logged
What do I get, no sleep at night.
dik9
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3025
Re: Another interesting ruling from WSOP
«
Reply #29 on:
July 16, 2012, 09:44:35 PM »
The second offence is definitely a penalty as he has exposed his cards with a player to act. Not only would he get a penalty for this offence, I would be having a word in his shell about his over enthusiasm. In both cases if he had waited for the dealer he wouldn't be in this situation. I would be making sure that I have explained clearly that his over enthusiasm
may
cost him his tournament life if it is done again.
Logged
Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...