poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 23, 2025, 09:43:38 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262387
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
The Lounge
Chess thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
121
122
123
124
[
125
]
126
127
128
129
...
164
Author
Topic: Chess thread (Read 445212 times)
Rexas
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1963
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1860 on:
March 10, 2014, 04:23:36 AM »
Would like to inform the thread that me and adrian played a few games today via skype and chess.com. We won one, lost two, the last from a seemingly winning position. We have concluded that we are the worst. Also, knight pins suck. We improved as it went on, just didn't notice a few very important variations :p
Also, the one we won was because the other guy disconnected.
«
Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 04:25:39 AM by Rexas
»
Logged
Quote from: verndog158 on June 29, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
Quote from: cambridgealex on November 04, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
I disrepectfully agree with Matt
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1861 on:
March 10, 2014, 08:39:58 AM »
There is something wrong with the way qualification for the Candidates Tournament works imo. Mamedyarov, Andreikin and maybe even Karjakin may be incredible players compared to the rest of the world, but they are no-hopers in this field. Last year Ivanchuk, Grischuk and Gelfand were the same and, sadly, Radjabov. I would have said the same about Svidler, but he over-performed last time. And Anand won't win, which leaves a three-horse race between Aronian, Kramnik and Topolov.
Yet, genuine contenders Nakamura and Caruana miss the tournament again.
I know it's partly based on qualification through specific events, but the some of the wrong players are ending up with the opportunity imo.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1862 on:
March 10, 2014, 08:58:14 AM »
Quote from: MintTrav on March 10, 2014, 08:39:58 AM
There is something wrong with the way qualification for the Candidates Tournament works imo. Mamedyarov, Andreikin and maybe even Karjakin may be incredible players compared to the rest of the world, but they are no-hopers in this field. Last year Ivanchuk, Grischuk and Gelfand were the same and, sadly, Radjabov. I would have said the same about Svidler, but he over-performed last time. And Anand won't win, which leaves a three-horse race between Aronian, Kramnik and Topolov.
Yet, genuine contenders Nakamura and Caruana miss the tournament again.
I know it's partly based on qualification through specific events, but the some of the wrong players are ending up with the opportunity imo.
To use a tikayism, I'm a little pushed for time today, but I think you're saying what a lot of people are saying. I would challenge you on Karjakin, who basically blows hot and cold, but did win an event ahead of Carlsen just a few months ago.
Andreikin has a good record against Kramnik, believe it or not. He won't be a pushover, even if he does finish bottom.
I think the winner will be decided by who avoids the most upsets. Aronian is known for being a little twitchy at the end of tournaments, although he ran away with Wijk aan Zee. Kramnik fell at the last in last year's Candidates and has a couple of players he doesn't fare all that well against in the field. Topalov will be an unknown quantity, as he doesn't get to play many major SuperGM events (the "toiletgate" affair means he doesn't play in comps where Kramnik is and I imagine that it is a factor for some sponsors).
Nakamura certainly thinks he should be invited. Caruana too, I'm sure. Svidler was the sponsors' choice. Funny, that, being in Russia.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1863 on:
March 10, 2014, 10:10:07 PM »
So who do those in the know think will win?
http://en.chessbase.com/post/who-will-win-the-2014-candidates-part-1-2
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1864 on:
March 10, 2014, 11:03:59 PM »
Yes, I accept what you say on Karjakin. He definitely deserves his place. Hard to see him besting K/A, but we could say that about anyone. I'm surprised that Topolov is so disregarded by the top players.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1865 on:
March 10, 2014, 11:04:42 PM »
Quote from: MintTrav on March 10, 2014, 11:03:59 PM
Yes, I accept what you say on Karjakin. He definitely deserves his place. Hard to see him besting K/A, but we could say that about anyone. I'm surprised that Topolov is so disregarded by the top players.
Not universally popular.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Honeybadger
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1920
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1866 on:
March 11, 2014, 03:13:37 PM »
Just want to remind all chess lovers about the Candidates pool on
www.stakesandladders.com
. Pool closes 9am Thursday. Please support our first ever chess pool. Here are some screenshots showing the questions:
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1867 on:
March 11, 2014, 10:45:00 PM »
Yes, get involved, guys and girls. Should be a bit of fun for the next couple of weeks.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1868 on:
March 12, 2014, 09:55:43 PM »
Opening ceremony:
http://en.chessbase.com/post/all-systems-go-for-the-2014-candidates-tournament
Tomorrow, we get down to business.
Starts 9am our time. Get some rest!
«
Last Edit: March 12, 2014, 09:57:52 PM by Tal
»
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Honeybadger
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1920
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1869 on:
March 12, 2014, 10:37:14 PM »
Just played a blitz game on FICS that had a finish I was pretty pleased with. Black has just played 34...Kc5. Slightly annoying because when my King moves away Black gets his King to b4 and makes it a little more laborious to turn my extra pawn into a win.
That said, I have plenty of mundane ways to win, including using the triangulation maneuver of 35 Kd3 Kb4 36 Kc2. But I spotted a really clear denouement involving forcing moves that required me to calculate 10 moves in advance to make sure it worked. Tbh the calculations are easy after the fact, but remember this is a blitz game and I had about 60 seconds left on my clock. So I could only afford to spend about 30 seconds of that time checking that it worked as I hoped. If I had made an error in visualisation then my opponent would escape with a draw. In order to play my 35th move with confidence I had to visualise the position in 10 moves time, and especially the position of the two opposing Kings. Like I said, easy after the game - not so easy under time constraints...
Can you spot what I played as White?
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1870 on:
March 12, 2014, 11:53:11 PM »
A nice practical one, that.
As for the safe alternative, the triangulation trick is hugely important in king and pawn endgames.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/more-puzzles/explanation-of-triangulation
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
McGlashan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2555
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1871 on:
March 12, 2014, 11:55:22 PM »
Nice example. What's the easiest way of posting a position (when you don't have any image hosting accounts)?
Logged
McGlashan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2555
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1872 on:
March 12, 2014, 11:58:23 PM »
Not that they would ever admit it but some people might be afraid of losing to Tal in the candidates pool thingy.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1873 on:
March 13, 2014, 12:03:57 AM »
Quote from: McGlashan on March 12, 2014, 11:58:23 PM
Not that they would ever admit it but some people might be afraid of losing to Tal in the candidates pool thingy.
I have as much chance as I do in any other pool. Genuinely.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: Chess thread
«
Reply #1874 on:
March 13, 2014, 07:53:58 AM »
So the commentary totty is being provided by Irina Krush.
I'm sure she knows chess and all that, but Susan Polgar she ain't.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
121
122
123
124
[
125
]
126
127
128
129
...
164
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...