blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 23, 2025, 09:43:38 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262387 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Chess thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 ... 164 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Chess thread  (Read 445212 times)
Rexas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1963


View Profile
« Reply #1860 on: March 10, 2014, 04:23:36 AM »

Would like to inform the thread that me and adrian played a few games today via skype and chess.com. We won one, lost two, the last from a seemingly winning position. We have concluded that we are the worst. Also, knight pins suck. We improved as it went on, just didn't notice a few very important variations :p









Also, the one we won was because the other guy disconnected.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 04:25:39 AM by Rexas » Logged

humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
I disrepectfully agree with Matt Smiley
MintTrav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3401


View Profile
« Reply #1861 on: March 10, 2014, 08:39:58 AM »

There is something wrong with the way qualification for the Candidates Tournament works imo. Mamedyarov, Andreikin and maybe even Karjakin may be incredible players compared to the rest of the world, but they are no-hopers in this field. Last year Ivanchuk, Grischuk and Gelfand were the same and, sadly, Radjabov. I would have said the same about Svidler, but he over-performed last time. And Anand won't win, which leaves a three-horse race between Aronian, Kramnik and Topolov.

Yet, genuine contenders Nakamura and Caruana miss the tournament again.

I know it's partly based on qualification through specific events, but the some of the wrong players are ending up with the opportunity imo.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1862 on: March 10, 2014, 08:58:14 AM »

There is something wrong with the way qualification for the Candidates Tournament works imo. Mamedyarov, Andreikin and maybe even Karjakin may be incredible players compared to the rest of the world, but they are no-hopers in this field. Last year Ivanchuk, Grischuk and Gelfand were the same and, sadly, Radjabov. I would have said the same about Svidler, but he over-performed last time. And Anand won't win, which leaves a three-horse race between Aronian, Kramnik and Topolov.

Yet, genuine contenders Nakamura and Caruana miss the tournament again.

I know it's partly based on qualification through specific events, but the some of the wrong players are ending up with the opportunity imo.

To use a tikayism, I'm a little pushed for time today, but I think you're saying what a lot of people are saying. I would challenge you on Karjakin, who basically blows hot and cold, but did win an event ahead of Carlsen just a few months ago.

Andreikin has a good record against Kramnik, believe it or not. He won't be a pushover, even if he does finish bottom.

I think the winner will be decided by who avoids the most upsets. Aronian is known for being a little twitchy at the end of tournaments, although he ran away with Wijk aan Zee. Kramnik fell at the last in last year's Candidates and has a couple of players he doesn't fare all that well against in the field. Topalov will be an unknown quantity, as he doesn't get to play many major SuperGM events (the "toiletgate" affair means he doesn't play in comps where Kramnik is and I imagine that it is a factor for some sponsors).

Nakamura certainly thinks he should be invited. Caruana too, I'm sure. Svidler was the sponsors' choice. Funny, that, being in Russia.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1863 on: March 10, 2014, 10:10:07 PM »

So who do those in the know think will win?

http://en.chessbase.com/post/who-will-win-the-2014-candidates-part-1-2

Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
MintTrav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3401


View Profile
« Reply #1864 on: March 10, 2014, 11:03:59 PM »

Yes, I accept what you say on Karjakin. He definitely deserves his place. Hard to see him besting K/A, but we could say that about anyone. I'm surprised that Topolov is so disregarded by the top players.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1865 on: March 10, 2014, 11:04:42 PM »

Yes, I accept what you say on Karjakin. He definitely deserves his place. Hard to see him besting K/A, but we could say that about anyone. I'm surprised that Topolov is so disregarded by the top players.

Not universally popular.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Honeybadger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1920



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1866 on: March 11, 2014, 03:13:37 PM »

Just want to remind all chess lovers about the Candidates pool on www.stakesandladders.com. Pool closes 9am Thursday. Please support our first ever chess pool. Here are some screenshots showing the questions:

Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1867 on: March 11, 2014, 10:45:00 PM »

Yes, get involved, guys and girls. Should be a bit of fun for the next couple of weeks.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1868 on: March 12, 2014, 09:55:43 PM »

Opening ceremony:

http://en.chessbase.com/post/all-systems-go-for-the-2014-candidates-tournament

Tomorrow, we get down to business.

Starts 9am our time. Get some rest!


« Last Edit: March 12, 2014, 09:57:52 PM by Tal » Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Honeybadger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1920



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1869 on: March 12, 2014, 10:37:14 PM »

Just played a blitz game on FICS that had a finish I was pretty pleased with. Black has just played 34...Kc5. Slightly annoying because when my King moves away Black gets his King to b4 and makes it a little more laborious to turn my extra pawn into a win.

That said, I have plenty of mundane ways to win, including using the triangulation maneuver of 35 Kd3 Kb4 36 Kc2. But I spotted a really clear denouement involving forcing moves that required me to calculate 10 moves in advance to make sure it worked. Tbh the calculations are easy after the fact, but remember this is a blitz game and I had about 60 seconds left on my clock. So I could only afford to spend about 30 seconds of that time checking that it worked as I hoped. If I had made an error in visualisation then my opponent would escape with a draw. In order to play my 35th move with confidence I had to visualise the position in 10 moves time, and especially the position of the two opposing Kings. Like I said, easy after the game - not so easy under time constraints...

Can you spot what I played as White?
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1870 on: March 12, 2014, 11:53:11 PM »

A nice practical one, that.



As for the safe alternative, the triangulation trick is hugely important in king and pawn endgames.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/more-puzzles/explanation-of-triangulation
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
McGlashan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2555


View Profile
« Reply #1871 on: March 12, 2014, 11:55:22 PM »

Nice example. What's the easiest way of posting a position (when you don't have any image hosting accounts)?
Logged
McGlashan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2555


View Profile
« Reply #1872 on: March 12, 2014, 11:58:23 PM »

Not that they would ever admit it but some people might be afraid of losing to Tal in the candidates pool thingy.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1873 on: March 13, 2014, 12:03:57 AM »

Not that they would ever admit it but some people might be afraid of losing to Tal in the candidates pool thingy.

I have as much chance as I do in any other pool. Genuinely.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
MintTrav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3401


View Profile
« Reply #1874 on: March 13, 2014, 07:53:58 AM »

So the commentary totty is being provided by Irina Krush.

I'm sure she knows chess and all that, but Susan Polgar she ain't.

 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 ... 164 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 19 queries.