poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 18, 2025, 11:02:15 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262307
Posts in
66604
Topics by
16990
Members
Latest Member:
Enut
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Talent v Likeability
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
Author
Topic: Talent v Likeability (Read 22540 times)
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #120 on:
December 31, 2012, 11:16:42 PM »
Quote from: Junior Senior on December 31, 2012, 11:12:19 PM
Is Tim Henman allowed? He didnt have much talent but i have never disliked any sportsman more than 'tiger' Tim. I have such dislike for the cockfaced nob!
He was fourth in the world so I think he'd be allowed. Wouldn't see him as controversial personally but fair enough.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
vegaslover
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4623
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #121 on:
January 01, 2013, 12:03:14 AM »
Quote from: The Baron on December 31, 2012, 10:11:39 PM
Kobe Bryant
Earl Strickland
Tiger Woods
Stefan Effenberg
Wayne Rooney
Ashley Cole
Joe Hart
Javier Mascherano (love him)
Luis Suarez (love him too)
Andre Agassi after reading his book
Shaun Murphy
John Higgins
Riddick Bowe
Rivaldo
Anatoly Karpov anyone?
None come close to Earl the Girl imo on that list
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #122 on:
January 01, 2013, 12:04:46 AM »
Quote from: vegaslover on January 01, 2013, 12:03:14 AM
Quote from: The Baron on December 31, 2012, 10:11:39 PM
Kobe Bryant
Earl Strickland
Tiger Woods
Stefan Effenberg
Wayne Rooney
Ashley Cole
Joe Hart
Javier Mascherano (love him)
Luis Suarez (love him too)
Andre Agassi after reading his book
Shaun Murphy
John Higgins
Riddick Bowe
Rivaldo
Anatoly Karpov anyone?
None come close to Earl the Girl imo on that list
Have to say I love the Pearl.
King of the world!
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
Ant040689
Probation
Offline
Posts: 0
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #123 on:
January 01, 2013, 12:34:18 AM »
Going to spell his name wrong now, but Michael Schumacher.
Logged
MintTrav
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3401
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #124 on:
January 01, 2013, 01:17:10 AM »
Quote from: Tal on December 31, 2012, 11:16:42 PM
Quote from: Junior Senior on December 31, 2012, 11:12:19 PM
Is Tim Henman allowed? He didnt have much talent but i have never disliked any sportsman more than 'tiger' Tim. I have such dislike for the cockfaced nob!
He was fourth in the world so I think he'd be allowed. Wouldn't see him as controversial personally but fair enough.
Disqualified from Wimbledon for assaulting a ballgirl. The hooligan.
Logged
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9165
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #125 on:
January 01, 2013, 10:03:13 AM »
I've read loads of book on the 'natural talent vs hard work' debate, and all of them pretty much prove that most of the people we view as having a natural talent were actually just incredibly hard working and put in loads more hours of practice than their rivals.
With that in mind I think how a lot of elite performers can be pricks makes sense, they are much more like workaholic CEOs who are so driven that good behaviour goes out the window, than naturally blessed people who should be thankful for what they have.
Logged
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9165
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #126 on:
January 01, 2013, 10:05:42 AM »
Have we had Gary Linekar in the talented but likeable list yet?
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #127 on:
January 01, 2013, 10:42:57 AM »
Quote from: DaveShoelace on January 01, 2013, 10:05:42 AM
Have we had Gary Linekar in the talented but likeable list yet?
I wouldn't think so
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
Cf
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8081
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #128 on:
January 01, 2013, 10:50:05 AM »
I'm not entirely sure why but whenever I see Cristiano Ronaldo's face on the television I have the desire to punch him in the face. And I'm not even a violent person!
Logged
Blue text
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #129 on:
January 01, 2013, 11:12:52 AM »
Quote from: DaveShoelace on January 01, 2013, 10:03:13 AM
I've read loads of book on the 'natural talent vs hard work' debate, and all of them pretty much prove that most of the people we view as having a natural talent were actually just incredibly hard working and put in loads more hours of practice than their rivals.
With that in mind I think how a lot of elite performers can be pricks makes sense, they are much more like workaholic CEOs who are so driven that good behaviour goes out the window, than naturally blessed people who should be thankful for what they have.
That's a good point. Di Canio, Zola, Beckham and probably any other player with particular skills were always known to be first on the training pitch and last off.
George Best worked so hard on his left foot he became left footed!
Garry Kasparov has said he doesn't regard himself as being a natural chess player but that he has a gift for concentration, which enabled him both to study harder than everyone else and to perform better over the board.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #130 on:
January 01, 2013, 11:18:27 AM »
It's a lot easier to put the hours in when you're naturally talented though. I'm sure Beckham wouldn't have put those hours in if he'd only had an average right-foot.
In rugby league, Sam Tomkins. The Lionel Messi of the super league and yet disliked by many outside Wigan. Was booed by Leeds fans when playing for England.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #131 on:
January 01, 2013, 03:56:23 PM »
Quote from: Cf on January 01, 2013, 10:50:05 AM
I'm not entirely sure why but whenever I see Cristiano Ronaldo's face on the television I have the desire to punch him in the face. And I'm not even a violent person!
envy?
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
jakally
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2003
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #132 on:
January 01, 2013, 04:03:39 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on January 01, 2013, 11:18:27 AM
It's a lot easier to put the hours in when you're naturally talented though. I'm sure Beckham wouldn't have put those hours in if he'd only had an average right-foot.
There are lots of very talented sports people, who don't try hard enough to become successful.
I can't prove anything, but it wouldn't be a big surprise if there were a decent number of kids of Beckham's age group, who could kick a ball as well as him at say, aged 12/13, but didn't work as hard as him.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #133 on:
January 01, 2013, 04:07:23 PM »
Quote from: jakally on January 01, 2013, 04:03:39 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on January 01, 2013, 11:18:27 AM
It's a lot easier to put the hours in when you're naturally talented though. I'm sure Beckham wouldn't have put those hours in if he'd only had an average right-foot.
There are lots of very talented sports people, who don't try hard enough to become successful.
I can't prove anything, but it wouldn't be a big surprise if there were a decent number of kids of Beckham's age group, who could kick a ball as well as him at say, aged 12/13, but didn't work as hard as him.
Oh, I agree. There are also lots of others who put in loads of hours of practice and effort and still fail to make it. There are also others that put loads of effort in and manage to be 'decent', but will never be able to get close to those who have the talent and apply themselves.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
horseplayer
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10314
Re: Talent v Likeability
«
Reply #134 on:
January 01, 2013, 04:30:37 PM »
interesting
there are players in the football league and even in the bluesq (at a push) that have or at least had more natural ability than some players in premier league mid-lower placed squads.
they either carry massive baggage, have not worked hard enough at there game or on the very rare occasion have just not been in the right situation (management e.t.c)
Logged
Pages:
1
...
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...