blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2025, 12:47:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262448 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Short stacked UTG spot.		 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Short stacked UTG spot.  (Read 2433 times)
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6261



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2013, 09:25:36 PM »
I prefer shove but opening is ok.

Your range is too tight TL Smiley
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2013, 10:12:27 PM »
Quote from: MC on January 07, 2013, 09:25:36 PM
I prefer shove but opening is ok.

Your range is too tight TL Smiley

What would you add? 66+? AJs KQs?

17bigs is alot to be open jamming much wider?

If you meant you can min the KQs AJs etc then that makes sense and i agree
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 10:19:03 PM by TL900 » Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6261



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2013, 10:32:51 PM »
Quote from: TL900 on January 07, 2013, 10:12:27 PM
Quote from: MC on January 07, 2013, 09:25:36 PM
I prefer shove but opening is ok.

Your range is too tight TL Smiley

What would you add? 66+? AJs KQs?

Yeah that's all I meant really
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22505



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2013, 10:36:18 PM »
Think JJ is too strong to jam live.
Logged
Sulphur man
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 602



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2013, 11:07:23 PM »
Quote from: mondatoo on January 07, 2013, 10:36:18 PM
Think JJ is too strong to jam live.
Effectively the same hand. More than happy to Jam here seems less
exploitable.
Logged
I've never played any game, or done anything that was so powerful at making you believe that you 'owned' it... before making you realize that you actually don't.
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6261



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2013, 11:09:03 PM »
Quote from: Sulphur man on January 07, 2013, 11:07:23 PM
Quote from: mondatoo on January 07, 2013, 10:36:18 PM
Think JJ is too strong to jam live.
Effectively the same hand. More than happy to Jam here seems less
exploitable.

[  ] effectively the same hand
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2013, 12:54:53 AM »
I am struggling to be bothered to post this for the millionth time on here, so yeah antes people stop looking at our stack as a simple multiple of the bb.
Logged
Yian
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 411



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2013, 01:03:39 AM »
I actually wouldn't mind folding 88 or less of the pairs with this stack UTG. Shove 99-JJ and min QQ-AA. Fold AJo KQo, shove KQs, AJs+. Seems tight but no one wants to go home this early on a day 2 before the money and you're getting snapped off only be hands that have you in heaps of trouble. But for this same reason, we can go much wider in the later positions.
Logged
Sulphur man
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 602



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2013, 04:15:12 AM »
Quote from: MC on January 07, 2013, 11:09:03 PM
Quote from: Sulphur man on January 07, 2013, 11:07:23 PM
Quote from: mondatoo on January 07, 2013, 10:36:18 PM
Think JJ is too strong to jam live.
Effectively the same hand. More than happy to Jam here seems less
exploitable.

[  ] effectively the same hand


OK  top medium pair then. Anyway as Longy states its not the bb's that matter as much here
its our CSI/M that should be the deciding factor and with it being as low as it is 7 would snap shove
88+,AQo+,ATs+,A5s,K10+,QJs.
Logged
I've never played any game, or done anything that was so powerful at making you believe that you 'owned' it... before making you realize that you actually don't.
WotRTheChances
MinRaiseFTW, WotRTheChances, Quelles_Sont
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012


#Team_Eureka


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2013, 06:08:19 AM »
Online its close, I jam 88-99 online here, but defo folding 77 and worse. Live I jam 99/TT, min better, fold worse. Probably r/f AT/AJ, KQ, r/c AQ+. Depends on my table draw quite a bit though... you can get away with being supremely exploitable and r/f some decent hands (AT/AJ here) and never be exploited... others you need to push the small edges. Generally 17bb live is loads though as people just fold way too much to jams.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 19 queries.