blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 22, 2025, 05:26:22 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262370 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Through the streets vs JP in St.Kitts
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Through the streets vs JP in St.Kitts  (Read 7316 times)
Honeybadger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1920



View Profile WWW
« Reply #60 on: January 17, 2013, 05:20:14 PM »

JP's river fold with K5s is him trying to 'exploit you' by using his read (whether it be a physical tell, a gut feeling, or just his perception of your range in this spot) to make a fold in a spot where he 'should' call in a vacuum.

If it turns out he was right to make the fold then he has outplayed you, although it is always possible that he has just made a lucky guess with the fold and randomly been correct this time. If it turns out that he was wrong to make the fold then you have outplayed him, although it is always possible that you have just made a lucky guess with your bluff and randomly got away with it this time.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 05:35:51 PM by Honeybadger » Logged
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: January 17, 2013, 05:43:44 PM »

^^ when you and Dave were discussing who was exploiting who it was great as I knew the result and understood all u guys posted.

I really felt I missed some value with my hand by chk raising the turn as this particular part of the play alerted JP to the fact I had a hand but I felt it the only play that theoretically enabled us to play for stacks ott or river.

I missed a bet by betting the river as JP 100% bets the river as played if I chk and probs calls off being pot stuck?

For Doobs Wink I had 88 in this hand for turned house but felt like I missed 1street.

Thx for all input guys
<3 Blonde!!
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: January 17, 2013, 06:00:47 PM »

His kicker was a 2?  Wink
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: January 17, 2013, 07:54:32 PM »

Just for interest, what other turn cards are you going to call the turn bet, and are there any other cards you check raise (eg 6 or 7)?

and just for interest did he act like this when he found out you had 88?

Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #64 on: January 18, 2013, 03:45:54 AM »

I'm really confused lol. It's a way different situation when it's the other way round!! the HH defo felt weird

It looks like a spot where i'v realised we're beat and trying to look really sick I'm unlikely to have folded in game (if it was as you said it was) but completely ruling out folding was defo a mistake everyone was making - speshly saying readless folding would be terrible, defo more likely to be good readless.

As it plays I think JPs thought process will have gone "he's very rarely bluffing and very rarely VB'ing worse" as simple as it is, and it's prolly true here.
Logged

Honeybadger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1920



View Profile WWW
« Reply #65 on: January 18, 2013, 04:35:29 AM »

Nah, I still think calling on the river is the best vacuum play with no reads. And I definitely think there is no justification at all for folding on the turn vs the min c/r as you (half) suggested.

Obviously any line can be justified based on a read though; whether it be a ninja spidey sense thing or just an opinion on how the majority of players are going to act in a particular spot. If the thought process you suggested JP would have had is accurate ("he's very rarely bluffing and very rarely value betting worse") then that is a read-based adjustment.
Logged
Honeybadger
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1920



View Profile WWW
« Reply #66 on: January 18, 2013, 04:54:17 AM »

Also... Rich, with all the switcherooing has it actually been made clear what JP's full hand was? i.e. did he fold K5 face-up, or did he just fold a 5 face up and you have fabricated the K for the sake of the switcheroo?

It does sort of make a difference whether hero has K5 or 52...

Logged
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: January 18, 2013, 08:50:35 AM »

^^ will come back to all points after the weekend
« Last Edit: January 18, 2013, 08:55:19 AM by Eso Kral » Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: January 18, 2013, 09:25:27 AM »

Also... Rich, with all the switcherooing has it actually been made clear what JP's full hand was? i.e. did he fold K5 face-up, or did he just fold a 5 face up and you have fabricated the K for the sake of the switcheroo?

It does sort of make a difference whether hero has K5 or 52...



That is what I was hinting at.  It is easier to fold 52 than k5, because his value range could include the likes of 57 and 56.  It feels like that could be enough to tip the scale for me.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #69 on: January 18, 2013, 10:47:41 AM »

Nah, I still think calling on the river is the best vacuum play with no reads. And I definitely think there is no justification at all for folding on the turn vs the min c/r as you (half) suggested.

You can apply all the theory you like to a spot, but play this one out in a tournament 200 times and I bet you just run into it a high %. People just don't bluff here all that much - that's just what my gut tells me
Logged

cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: January 18, 2013, 11:00:02 AM »

Just for interest, what other turn cards are you going to call the turn bet, and are there any other cards you check raise (eg 6 or 7)?

and just for interest did he act like this when he found out you had 88?



God how bad does Vanessa come across there?
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
bobAlike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5823


View Profile
« Reply #71 on: January 18, 2013, 11:32:27 AM »

Just for interest, what other turn cards are you going to call the turn bet, and are there any other cards you check raise (eg 6 or 7)?

and just for interest did he act like this when he found out you had 88?



God how bad does Vanessa come across there?

Yeah, she looks like a bloke.
Smiley

« Last Edit: January 18, 2013, 11:46:07 AM by bobAlike » Logged

Ah! The element of surprise
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #72 on: January 18, 2013, 12:14:09 PM »

I doubt she is trying to attract you.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
bobAlike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5823


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: January 18, 2013, 12:32:05 PM »

I'm under no illusion that she is.
Logged

Ah! The element of surprise
PaintingByNumbers
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #74 on: January 19, 2013, 01:09:50 AM »

You should see bob's videos.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.174 seconds with 19 queries.