you'd probably breathe in more shit whilst stuck in a traffic jam/or waiting for a bus!
Not that one again. It's amazing how the people who care least about what junk they breathe in always quote traffic pollution, as if they give a hoot about what effect it has on them. Just because we have to breathe traffic fumes doesn't mean we have to put up with cigarette smoke or its substitutes.
Or maybe .....
It's amazing how the people who moaned forever about smoking in pubs - until they got a blanket ban - never seem to use them, now they've got their own way.
And with the advent of e-cigs quickly dismiss any research from the Nasal Nuisance Nutter Brigade, if it contradicts the dogma they wish to enforce.
What part of:
'CONCLUSIONS: For all byproducts measured, electronic cigarettes produce very small exposures relative to tobacco cigarettes. The study indicates no apparent risk to human health from e-cigarette emissions based on the compounds analyzed'.did you not understand?
We all know smoking tobacco is smelly, unhealthy, and dangerous to those nearby that might passively inhale ..... no problem with that, it shouldn't be allowed.
But, when the study (quoted by your fellow NNNB member) doesn't support your fears that the product will wreak havoc with your respiratory system - how can you demand it be banished?
If you ever got round to study Elf & Stacey implications of the VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) that are present/produced in the environment, people like you would never leave the house (which is full of them anyway!).
Just saying like ....