poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 27, 2025, 02:44:55 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2261837
Posts in
66597
Topics by
16985
Members
Latest Member:
Going south
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
UKIPT London bad runout
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: UKIPT London bad runout (Read 2398 times)
TL900
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2418
UKIPT London bad runout
«
on:
October 07, 2013, 04:28:00 PM »
Ok so this hand came up near the end of day 1 and i wasnt too sure about the river.
We have been at the table about 1 hour and won nearly every pot weve played but not gone to showdown very much i will have a v lag image.
400/800/100
Guy opens from the HJ off 20k to 1700 no reads.
Button asks how much he has and calls (playing about 70k seemingly splashy and has already triplr barrell bluffed about 45mins before this hand)
We look down at
in the sb and decide to 3bet to 4900 (too small?) think its tough to go any bigger and the opener still think he has FE? We cover all, this is only my 2nd 3bet on the table.
Opener folds, button peels after a little dwell.
Pot: 13kish
I decide im gona x/c 3 on most runouts vs described villain as he seems like hes had enough of me and wants to regain tablecaptaincy.
He bets 6k i call,
Pot: 25k
Goes check check
We check? He bets 14500 we call.
«
Last Edit: October 07, 2013, 04:33:34 PM by TL900
»
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5369
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #1 on:
October 07, 2013, 04:45:20 PM »
He reps small pairs all the way. I wouldn't go bigger (more than 10%+ anyway) pre. If we call here what are we ever folding? We have the weakest hand we decide to c/c all the way right? Heroes gonna hero tho
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #2 on:
October 07, 2013, 05:20:27 PM »
I think this is very well played pre flop, and whilst I do like having a c/call range vs aggresive opponents I think Id still go for a bet otf. We could either just go for 3 or...
I feel like if he is aggresive and has any kind of equity on the flop he wont fold, that will include back door flush draws. I think too often the board runs out very dirty and we end up incorrectly calling (as this hand happened imo) or we fold the best hand, or get tilted because we think we folded the best hand.
My plan generally here would be to cbet to a size that would leave more than a pot sized bet ott so we check and represent AK (in opponents mind we will have AK or JJ here like 99% of the time) and then c/shove the turn. He will sometimes b/f some gutshots or something, if he has a hand like 98s i think he bets almost always and will probably station if we tank jam, and if he has Qx we always get all the cheese.
With his weak Qx and 9x i think hes more likely to check a street or bet v small on most run outs. On some run outs he may check both turn and river, and with 9x he may always check turn and river.
If he doesnt bet 9x its not that much of a problem. If he checks turn and bets river I would check shove on almost all rivers and expect him to hero call pretty wide, usually he will have 9x.
Ive misread stack size a little bit, and I think i prefer the above with around 50k stacks, although if we make it 5k pre and put in 6k on the flop, if he bets 18k or something similar its not really an overbet at all and can represent a lot more that we think we have some perceived fold equity.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #3 on:
October 07, 2013, 05:23:29 PM »
as played to the river i think its a trivial fold....
board just ran out so bad and whilst he can have a bunch of underpairs (perhaps unlikely and would want to sd vs AK otf?) I just feel like our stack is worth protecting and he has an absolute chunk of super value and marginal value combos. We also have a decent amount of jx in our range and even 2 pairs so that we dont have to call here. As the Wizard that is Adam Picken said, this is basically the bottom of our range so if we are heroing here, were basically heroing our entire range. Im as big a hero as anybody but even I think this is a tad too much.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5369
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #4 on:
October 07, 2013, 05:27:04 PM »
Quote from: pleno1 on October 07, 2013, 05:23:29 PM
as played to the river i think its a trivial fold....
board just ran out so bad and whilst he can have a bunch of underpairs (perhaps unlikely and would want to sd vs AK otf?) I just feel like our stack is worth protecting and he has an absolute chunk of super value and marginal value combos. We also have a decent amount of jx in our range and even 2 pairs so that we dont have to call here. As the Wizard that is Adam Picken said, this is basically the bottom of our range so if we are heroing here, were basically heroing our entire range. Im as big a hero as anybody but even I think this is a tad too much.
He asks how much the guy has tho so he prob has 88 or 22 or something silly. I don't see what Jacks this guy has. Maybe we should raise river.
C/c range is nice but people don't triple very often live.
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Pinchop73
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1435
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #5 on:
October 08, 2013, 12:06:55 AM »
We rarely beat Qx hands otr that peel peel pre.
Turn check feels like he has showdown value given history.
I understand you wanting to call three post, but it's a pretty brutal runout.
But yeah, guess he seems capable enough to turn lower pairs into bluffs on this board as well as some club draws. May value bet TcXc otr?
With the read we have I don't mind a sigh call I guess.
«
Last Edit: October 08, 2013, 12:11:54 AM by Pinchop73
»
Logged
First they came for the nits, and I did not speak out because I was not a nit
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #6 on:
October 08, 2013, 12:12:03 AM »
how many chips you got?
Logged
Pinchop73
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1435
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #7 on:
October 08, 2013, 12:13:16 AM »
Covers
Logged
First they came for the nits, and I did not speak out because I was not a nit
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #8 on:
October 08, 2013, 12:17:33 AM »
squeezing bit bigger. quite like the line but think more value in betting tbh, with ur image too good a spot to see go check check and then get zero value on further streets.
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #9 on:
October 08, 2013, 05:05:45 AM »
Quote from: rfgqqabc on October 07, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Quote from: pleno1 on October 07, 2013, 05:23:29 PM
as played to the river i think its a trivial fold....
board just ran out so bad and whilst he can have a bunch of underpairs (perhaps unlikely and would want to sd vs AK otf?) I just feel like our stack is worth protecting and he has an absolute chunk of super value and marginal value combos. We also have a decent amount of jx in our range and even 2 pairs so that we dont have to call here. As the Wizard that is Adam Picken said, this is basically the bottom of our range so if we are heroing here, were basically heroing our entire range. Im as big a hero as anybody but even I think this is a tad too much.
He asks how much the guy has tho so he prob has 88 or 22 or something silly. I don't see what Jacks this guy has. Maybe we should raise river.
C/c range is nice but people don't triple very often live.
People think its cool to ask, they usually just snap peel their pairs. I wouldnt read too much into that or at least not make a full decision on it. If you think he has just small pairs why would you consider raising?!
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
NoCardDSC
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 382
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #10 on:
October 08, 2013, 07:57:28 AM »
Quote from: pleno1 on October 07, 2013, 05:20:27 PM
I think this is very well played pre flop, and whilst I do like having a c/call range vs aggresive opponents I think Id still go for a bet otf. We could either just go for 3 or...
I feel like if he is aggresive and has any kind of equity on the flop he wont fold, that will include back door flush draws. I think too often the board runs out very dirty and we end up incorrectly calling (as this hand happened imo) or we fold the best hand, or get tilted because we think we folded the best hand.
My plan generally here would be to cbet to a size that would leave more than a pot sized bet ott so we check and represent AK (in opponents mind we will have AK or JJ here like 99% of the time) and then c/shove the turn. He will sometimes b/f some gutshots or something, if he has a hand like 98s i think he bets almost always and will probably station if we tank jam, and if he has Qx we always get all the cheese.
With his weak Qx and 9x i think hes more likely to check a street or bet v small on most run outs. On some run outs he may check both turn and river, and with 9x he may always check turn and river.
If he doesnt bet 9x its not that much of a problem. If he checks turn and bets river I would check shove on almost all rivers and expect him to hero call pretty wide, usually he will have 9x.
Ive misread stack size a little bit, and I think i prefer the above with around 50k stacks, although if we make it 5k pre and put in 6k on the flop, if he bets 18k or something similar its not really an overbet at all and can represent a lot more that we think we have some perceived fold equity.
I think this is near enough spot on tbh.
Logged
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5369
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #11 on:
October 08, 2013, 03:48:15 PM »
Quote from: pleno1 on October 08, 2013, 05:05:45 AM
Quote from: rfgqqabc on October 07, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Quote from: pleno1 on October 07, 2013, 05:23:29 PM
as played to the river i think its a trivial fold....
board just ran out so bad and whilst he can have a bunch of underpairs (perhaps unlikely and would want to sd vs AK otf?) I just feel like our stack is worth protecting and he has an absolute chunk of super value and marginal value combos. We also have a decent amount of jx in our range and even 2 pairs so that we dont have to call here. As the Wizard that is Adam Picken said, this is basically the bottom of our range so if we are heroing here, were basically heroing our entire range. Im as big a hero as anybody but even I think this is a tad too much.
He asks how much the guy has tho so he prob has 88 or 22 or something silly. I don't see what Jacks this guy has. Maybe we should raise river.
C/c range is nice but people don't triple very often live.
People think its cool to ask, they usually just snap peel their pairs. I wouldnt read too much into that or at least not make a full decision on it. If you think he has just small pairs why would you consider raising?!
What if he has something silly that should definitely check back but has bet and is beating us. I'm not going to make a full decision on what he said but it feels somewhat likely. It could be a fairly big hand esp with the tank flat of the 3b. Fishhooks maybe
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #12 on:
October 08, 2013, 04:53:28 PM »
Quote from: rfgqqabc on October 08, 2013, 03:48:15 PM
Quote from: pleno1 on October 08, 2013, 05:05:45 AM
Quote from: rfgqqabc on October 07, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Quote from: pleno1 on October 07, 2013, 05:23:29 PM
as played to the river i think its a trivial fold....
board just ran out so bad and whilst he can have a bunch of underpairs (perhaps unlikely and would want to sd vs AK otf?) I just feel like our stack is worth protecting and he has an absolute chunk of super value and marginal value combos. We also have a decent amount of jx in our range and even 2 pairs so that we dont have to call here. As the Wizard that is Adam Picken said, this is basically the bottom of our range so if we are heroing here, were basically heroing our entire range. Im as big a hero as anybody but even I think this is a tad too much.
He asks how much the guy has tho so he prob has 88 or 22 or something silly. I don't see what Jacks this guy has. Maybe we should raise river.
C/c range is nice but people don't triple very often live.
People think its cool to ask, they usually just snap peel their pairs. I wouldnt read too much into that or at least not make a full decision on it. If you think he has just small pairs why would you consider raising?!
What if he has something silly that should definitely check back but has bet and is beating us. I'm not going to make a full decision on what he said but it feels somewhat likely. It could be a fairly big hand esp with the tank flat of the 3b. Fishhooks maybe
JJ makes a lot of sense given the way the hand plays out. He bets the flop when you check "putting you on AK" maybe. Checks back the turn and hits gin on the river. I don't like calling here.
I also don't like checking the flop when we have TPTK even though it invites trouble if we face a raise.
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #13 on:
October 09, 2013, 03:08:23 PM »
I like the spot flop check fwiw. i think People do definitely bet these boards which hit their ranges, and your gameflow reasoning behind the action is logical. Wp.
I would definitely go a tad bigger pre, i think you're losing value.
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: UKIPT London bad runout
«
Reply #14 on:
October 09, 2013, 03:11:34 PM »
Why can't he have Jx btw? Don't get hung up on your pre flop read of small pairs, you have to be able to process new information since we get so much more of it from the way our villain interacts with 5 cards than he did with the 2 preflop.
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...