blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 29, 2025, 06:06:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261965 Posts in 66597 Topics by 16986 Members
Latest Member: GazzaT
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  might be terrible, i duno?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: might be terrible, i duno?  (Read 2397 times)
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« on: November 07, 2013, 05:02:55 PM »

http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/5762304_FFE2EC2CE9

readless, vllian got seemingly reggy stats over a tiny sample but i wouldnt read into it
« Last Edit: November 07, 2013, 05:05:50 PM by TL900 » Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2013, 05:25:13 PM »

I know we lose the hand ( so woulda cost us more this time) but is pre flop and cbet a tad too small and would be thinking more like $1.50 pre, $2.25 cb?

Obv could nit fold the turn as the ace hits you so dont mind the call and solid fold otr imo
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2013, 05:26:23 PM »

could be a nice fold, exploitable though obv
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2013, 05:41:27 PM »

I know we lose the hand ( so woulda cost us more this time) but is pre flop and cbet a tad too small and would be thinking more like $1.50 pre, $2.25 cb?

i think 2.5x in the CO is fine especially vs weak buttons which most of the players at 50nl will be. Def agree on $2-$2.25 otf tho, tourney fish init
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2013, 05:43:43 PM »

I know we lose the hand ( so woulda cost us more this time) but is pre flop and cbet a tad too small and would be thinking more like $1.50 pre, $2.25 cb?

i think 2.5x in the CO is fine especially vs weak buttons which most of the players at 50nl will be. Def agree on $2-$2.25 otf tho, tourney fish init
Ha thats exactly what I was thinking (obv not the fish part :p) but tourney sizing
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
david3103
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2013, 09:48:39 AM »

Why are we calling the raise on flop and calling turn if we're folding river?
Logged

It's more about the winning than the winnings

5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
millidonk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9059


I'm supposed to wear a shell.. I don't - SLUG LIFE


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2013, 10:15:55 AM »

Why are we calling the raise on flop and calling turn if we're folding river?


Hoping he gives up river I imagine.
 

He only really ever has 44 or 88 that beats us and even then I can't see too many people check raising a set on a flop that dry as they are just going to kill their action so often. Unless he knows you are coming along for the ride regardless? Readless I just can't see me folding tbh, we beat too much.
Logged

NoCardDSC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2013, 02:41:37 PM »

I definitely can't see me folding in game, but looking at it obv just screams 44 or 88, but that is literally all the only value hands he can have right?
Logged
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2013, 02:46:11 PM »

JT makes sense too. hand is wp in a vaccuum imo
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2013, 02:55:40 PM »

would be the bottom of my calling range otr, and as with most of the bottom of your range its usually not a nice-easy call. if he was c raising some kind of bdfd or something funy then the A gives him perhaps the perceived chance of going a little bit lairy.

He also called from the sb so may not even have 44 or jt in his range, both are folds pre imo, but obv its 50nl.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
BulldozerD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1888



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2013, 03:48:49 PM »

JT makes sense too. hand is wp in a vaccuum imo

How come? Why would he check raise a gutshot here?

a bluff with at least some equity.

Think its a good fold. I played a fair bit of 50nl zoom earlier this year and villains will never be folding any pocket pair pre here to a single raise. As Pleno says its the bottom of your river calling range but they show up with bottom/middle set so much here, unless you have history or particular read on villain then fold is probably good. Although doubt I ever fold in game as I am a river station.
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2013, 03:59:11 PM »

JT makes sense too. hand is wp in a vaccuum imo

How come? Why would he check raise a gutshot here?

a bluff with at least some equity.

Think its a good fold. I played a fair bit of 50nl zoom earlier this year and villains will never be folding any pocket pair pre here to a single raise. As Pleno says its the bottom of your river calling range but they show up with bottom/middle set so much here, unless you have history or particular read on villain then fold is probably good. Although doubt I ever fold in game as I am a river station.


hmmm I think youd be surprised, I know about 15 guys who play nl50 (lol sample size obv) and abotu 10 of them follow a chart pre flop, which will almost certainly say fold 44, jt pre flop.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Pinchop73
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1435


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2013, 04:12:36 PM »

I know about 15 guys who play nl50 (lol sample size obv) and abotu 10 of them follow a chart

 Click to see full-size image.


Logged

First they came for the nits, and I did not speak out because I was not a nit
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2013, 04:18:44 PM »

here is what you can expect



Defending range: 66+, A9s+, A5s-A2s, K9s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T8s+, 97s+, 86s+, 75s+, 65s, ATo+, KTo+, QTo+ (20%, #270)

Blue and Red is 3bet fold and 5bet respectively.

Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
millidonk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9059


I'm supposed to wear a shell.. I don't - SLUG LIFE


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2013, 08:53:27 AM »

So they are 5betting AQo and flatting AQs?
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.13 seconds with 19 queries.