blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2024, 08:30:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272592 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Bigger 55- Interesting spot with 10s
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Bigger 55- Interesting spot with 10s  (Read 1228 times)
verndog158
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2016


omgpoker


View Profile
« on: September 18, 2014, 06:22:34 PM »

As you can see, got a pretty rough table draw first up in the bigger 55, interesting hand from earlyish on though...

PokerStars Hand #121539157061: Tournament #965611880, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (25/50) - 2014/09/14 20:45:41 WET [2014/09/14 15:45:41 ET]
Table '965611880 164' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: pads1161 (2855 in chips)
Seat 2: davidv1213 (3564 in chips)
Seat 3: Epiphany77 (2590 in chips)
Seat 4: Big Popp4 (3581 in chips)
Seat 5: luvlust (5304 in chips)
Seat 6: stonesunited (2773 in chips)
Seat 7: iamVerndog (5940 in chips)
Seat 8: JulemanD2k9 (3307 in chips)
Seat 9: bnn1960 (3056 in chips)
bnn1960: posts small blind 25
pads1161: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to iamVerndog [ ]
davidv1213: folds
Epiphany77: folds
Big Popp4: raises 75 to 125
luvlust: raises 225 to 350
stonesunited: folds
iamVerndog.....Huh??

Thoughts on whats best to do here? Stack dependant? Peeling? 4 Betting? Folding?

Logged

ignore verndog he's a fool

'he had a deep run in EPT Barnsley'
theprawnidentity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3602


8 high happens!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2014, 09:18:52 AM »

Stack dependant? I should hope so!

I'm not sure I want to 4b because we will end up committing ourselves vs OR and won't be in great shape at all vs his 5b'ing range.  I'm between flat or fold and it's entirely dependant on the OR.  If I think I'm going to be able to see a flop most of the time then I would 100% flat, if the raiser is a complete basket case and has any sort of tendency to start windmilling chips about pre then just fold.
Logged
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6730


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2014, 03:48:28 PM »

You got about twice the chips of most people at the table so not liking entering pots in passive fashion esp with various players behind including opener. 4bet seems a bit strong early doors so ok about fold I guess.
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10536



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2014, 04:49:33 PM »

I'd fold.

Logged

pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19107



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2014, 11:18:49 PM »

yeh i think this is a pretty clear fold.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5483


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2014, 11:41:11 PM »

Fold JJ and prob qq too
Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Dubai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2014, 12:05:10 AM »

If we should fold what everyone says then we should basically 3bet every hand as luvlust! No wonder poker is so easy Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.109 seconds with 20 queries.