poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 18, 2025, 03:41:38 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262307
Posts in
66604
Topics by
16990
Members
Latest Member:
Enut
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Another Ruling Debate
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: Another Ruling Debate (Read 5962 times)
Vinodh
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 482
Another Ruling Debate
«
on:
September 19, 2014, 09:26:35 AM »
Here we go again!
DTD- GPS main event satellite. Rebuy /add on period over.
Blinds 800/1600. 3 early postions limps,HJ raises to 6500, I am OTB reraised to 16k. SB,BB,first two limpers fold, 3rd limper shoves for 31k.
I am cotemplating a call for about minute and half. I dont say anything, put the calling chips and turns over my cards. Meanwhile, the shover was having his dinner, didnt see my action ( he thought I had folded and showed my cards) and mucked his cards straight away. What should be the ruling?
Logged
redsimon
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8631
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #1 on:
September 19, 2014, 09:32:45 AM »
Loses his chips if his cards can't be easily retrieved?
Seem to remember a player once shoved allin from seat 1 at DTD a few years ago in the Deepstack and dealer mucked his unprotected cards and his chips still went in?
Logged
Success has many parents but failure is an orphan
http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
Vinodh
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 482
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #2 on:
September 19, 2014, 09:54:16 AM »
Cards were easily retrievable
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16729
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #3 on:
September 19, 2014, 10:01:38 AM »
Quote from: Vinodh on September 19, 2014, 09:54:16 AM
Cards were easily retrievable
Cards speak then? Why would it be anything other than this. We have reached the river, no other action is possible, both players 2 cards are obvious.
Why didn't you say anything? Seems easy enough to say call as you put the chips in.
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Marky147
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22634
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #4 on:
September 19, 2014, 10:02:57 AM »
I'd go with, cards are retrieved and hand plays out normally.
Logged
Burning $$$ in Vegas 2021
http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=68840.0
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #5 on:
September 19, 2014, 10:05:37 AM »
Quote from: Doobs on September 19, 2014, 10:01:38 AM
Quote from: Vinodh on September 19, 2014, 09:54:16 AM
Cards were easily retrievable
Cards speak then? Why would it be anything other than this. We have reached the river, no other action is possible, both players 2 cards are obvious.
Why didn't you say anything? Seems easy enough to say call as you put the chips in.
All of this.
If you saw the guy wasn't concentrating, your deliberate choice not to say anything could be misinterpreted.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9281
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #6 on:
September 19, 2014, 10:32:48 AM »
If cards are retrievable then they speak. You've called the all in.
Logged
Rexas
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1963
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #7 on:
September 19, 2014, 11:56:01 AM »
@ redsimon, we haven't reached a river, this is preflop.
Personally, I think the correct "technical" ruling here is probably that once the cards are in the muck, the hand is dead. You can't reach into the muck and retrieve your cards once you've folded them in any other scenario, once they're in there they're dead. However, DTD does seem to emphasize making rulings in the interest of the fairness of the game, which is definitely a good thing in my opinion. In this case, it was clear what the player wanted to do, and it was clear he had made an honest mistake, and the mistake was easily rectifiable. Fwiw, I would allow the all in player to retrieve his cards and give him a pretty stern warning about paying attention to hands he's heavily involved in.
Logged
Quote from: verndog158 on June 29, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
Quote from: cambridgealex on November 04, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
I disrepectfully agree with Matt
redsimon
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8631
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #8 on:
September 19, 2014, 11:58:17 AM »
Quote from: Rexas on September 19, 2014, 11:56:01 AM
@ redsimon, we haven't reached a river, this is preflop.
Personally, I think the correct "technical" ruling here is probably that once the cards are in the muck, the hand is dead. You can't reach into the muck and retrieve your cards once you've folded them in any other scenario, once they're in there they're dead. However, DTD does seem to emphasize making rulings in the interest of the fairness of the game, which is definitely a good thing in my opinion. In this case, it was clear what the player wanted to do, and it was clear he had made an honest mistake, and the mistake was easily rectifiable. Fwiw, I would allow the all in player to retrieve his cards and give him a pretty stern warning about paying attention to hands he's heavily involved in.
Never said anything about a river mate?
Logged
Success has many parents but failure is an orphan
http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
Doobs
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16729
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #9 on:
September 19, 2014, 12:15:12 PM »
Quote from: redsimon on September 19, 2014, 11:58:17 AM
Quote from: Rexas on September 19, 2014, 11:56:01 AM
@ redsimon, we haven't reached a river, this is preflop.
Personally, I think the correct "technical" ruling here is probably that once the cards are in the muck, the hand is dead. You can't reach into the muck and retrieve your cards once you've folded them in any other scenario, once they're in there they're dead. However, DTD does seem to emphasize making rulings in the interest of the fairness of the game, which is definitely a good thing in my opinion. In this case, it was clear what the player wanted to do, and it was clear he had made an honest mistake, and the mistake was easily rectifiable. Fwiw, I would allow the all in player to retrieve his cards and give him a pretty stern warning about paying attention to hands he's heavily involved in.
Never said anything about a river mate?
My fault I think, misread of the hand.
Logged
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Rexas
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1963
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #10 on:
September 19, 2014, 12:50:25 PM »
Quote from: redsimon on September 19, 2014, 11:58:17 AM
Quote from: Rexas on September 19, 2014, 11:56:01 AM
@ redsimon, we haven't reached a river, this is preflop.
Personally, I think the correct "technical" ruling here is probably that once the cards are in the muck, the hand is dead. You can't reach into the muck and retrieve your cards once you've folded them in any other scenario, once they're in there they're dead. However, DTD does seem to emphasize making rulings in the interest of the fairness of the game, which is definitely a good thing in my opinion. In this case, it was clear what the player wanted to do, and it was clear he had made an honest mistake, and the mistake was easily rectifiable. Fwiw, I would allow the all in player to retrieve his cards and give him a pretty stern warning about paying attention to hands he's heavily involved in.
Never said anything about a river mate?
Sorry pal, meant to be for Doobs! Misread who wrote the comment
Logged
Quote from: verndog158 on June 29, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
Quote from: cambridgealex on November 04, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
I disrepectfully agree with Matt
verndog158
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2025
omgpoker
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #11 on:
September 19, 2014, 01:00:50 PM »
If the cards were easily retrievable, as suggested, it probably means they weren't in the muck. If so then I agree with rexarse and co, that common sense means they are retrieved and hand played out
Logged
Quote from: MassiveFish on September 25, 2014, 05:15:30 PM
ignore verndog he's a fool
'he had a deep run in EPT Barnsley'
doubleup
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7126
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #12 on:
September 19, 2014, 01:01:17 PM »
Does OP really need to think for 1.5 mins when hes getting about 4-1 pre-flop? (even if it is a satellite)
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6089
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #13 on:
September 19, 2014, 01:28:28 PM »
Quote from: doubleup on September 19, 2014, 01:01:17 PM
Does OP really need to think for 1.5 mins when hes getting about 4-1 pre-flop? (even if it is a satellite)
it's a satellite, odds mean less than survival
Logged
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
doubleup
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7126
Re: Another Ruling Debate
«
Reply #14 on:
September 19, 2014, 01:32:44 PM »
Quote from: david3103 on September 19, 2014, 01:28:28 PM
Quote from: doubleup on September 19, 2014, 01:01:17 PM
Does OP really need to think for 1.5 mins when hes getting about 4-1 pre-flop?
(even if it is a satellite)
it's a satellite, odds mean less than survival
That's why I said the bold bit
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...