blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 08:05:45 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262324 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Mass PLO bot ring-found on stars
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Mass PLO bot ring-found on stars  (Read 16098 times)
Whollyflush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



View Profile
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:19:15 AM »

Don't think there are any cliffs as yet. suspected up to 25 accounts so far found mainly 200PLO estimated profits $1.4mill according to whoTfru.

Some of the accounts still active as of 9/6/15 and no word from a stars rep so far

links from 2p2:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/153/high-stakes-pl-omaha/massive-bot-ring-pokerstars-how-spot-them-1537778/

Dumbed down NVG link:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29/news-views-gossip-brought-you-online-poker-report/news-massive-plo-bot-ring-pokerstars-millions-hands-huge-winners-1538509/
Logged

@whollyflush on twitter
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2015, 10:06:56 AM »

fkn Russains ruin it for everyone.

Only way to win nowadays is to cheat it seems...
Logged

simonnatur
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 766


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2015, 01:10:58 PM »

I found the thread interesting and the $ values won with these bots amazing. Multiple people in the 2+2 thread saying this kills online poker in 10 years, I'ld say closer to 10 months unless the issue is addressed.
Logged

Reluctant to race, came home in own time
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 20728



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2015, 02:19:40 PM »

Why aren't the security and game integrity departments of at least stars good enough to catch these before the players do? They played millions of hands!

I've played against most of the names and they are 100bb'ing and to my recollection they are pretty good. I didn't think a bot would be that sophisticated.

It's more worrying that on other sites they will do very little.
Logged

@GreekStein on twitter.

Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5371


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2015, 02:40:25 PM »

They have human controllers at least some times. It's really really scary though. Tournaments might be the only safe place left online. Stars have the best support and method/means and couldn't stop this. I dread to think about the other sites
Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Whollyflush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2015, 04:33:37 PM »

The figure taken from legit players is likely to be in the region of $4million, when you consider they have contributed approx $2.5mill in rake. I wonder if stars plans on redistributing that?

It seems these bots were highly sophisticated in some sort of hole card sharing, which is a bigger deal in PLO than NLHE for card removal. Which goes a long way to explaining why regs thought they were awful but they crushed harder than anyone.

Naturally this lead the bots to run massively above AIEV, as they took -EV lines with perhaps knowing which cards were dead etc etc.

I'd imagine more information to come to light over the coming days.
Logged

@whollyflush on twitter
Jamier-Host
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1831



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2015, 04:56:28 PM »

I don't know why these stories still surprise people.

There have been very smart people working on poker AI for a long time, and i'd be surprised if there were any sites where their presence wasn't rife. There are some pretty crappy bits of commercial software available (e.g this one) that allow anyone to get involved and potentially enhance the decision making of the default profiles provided. However the really dangerous guys are those that quietly work in private and, even more powerfully, add real-time collusion to the mix. It's just inevitable that it's going on with the financial upside.

Part of the problem is that for the sites/networks that aren't at the top of the tree, these guys probably contribute a big chunk of their ongoing revenue! It's true you'd hope Stars would have more of a long-term outlook on the downside, but they're still up against a bunch of very smart computer scientists, and it's like other cyber security areas where you're often fighting a losing battle against highly sophisticated "attackers".
Logged

Side Project - making games for Amazon Alexa devices

pressthe8.com
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2015, 06:19:10 PM »

Jamier-Host nails it.

Only a matter of time before a player is ejected from a live major tournament for running hands through an engine, either on his 'phone or being fed the info through a device. It's inevitable.

Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2015, 06:21:26 PM »

Jamier-Host nails it.

Only a matter of time before a player is ejected from a live major tournament for running hands through an engine, either on his 'phone or being fed the info through a device. It's inevitable.

I'd start getting suspicious if this guy sits down to play with you.

Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2015, 06:35:33 PM »

Jamier-Host nails it.

Only a matter of time before a player is ejected from a live major tournament for running hands through an engine, either on his 'phone or being fed the info through a device. It's inevitable.

I'd start getting suspicious if this guy sits down to play with you.



Where were you when I needed you, Andrew?
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2015, 06:56:02 PM »

Ugh, scary shit Sad
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
teddybloat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 756


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2015, 07:31:20 PM »

Lets legalise bots.

Give them their own room where players can pit their wits against bots, or bot makers can pit their bots against other bots.

Bring it out in the open imo.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2015, 08:06:59 PM »

these bots pay the same rake to the room that you or i pay? the room does not distinguish?

so up and until now its fair to say the incentive for the room to do much about this has been mixed at best?
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Whollyflush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2015, 09:44:45 PM »

these bots pay the same rake to the room that you or i pay? the room does not distinguish?

so up and until now its fair to say the incentive for the room to do much about this has been mixed at best?

If they were break even or slight winners/losers pre rakeback, this would be perfect for the site. As it turns out they are the absolute crushers of these stakes, the fact they have raked 2.5mill and lets assume they have cashed out all 1.4mill its still a net win for stars.

I only play NLHE but got a refund for $60 last week and I have no idea who or how long the banned account had been around. I'd be surprised if a more proportional refund wasn't closer to $600. You would hope been regulated, there more clarity on jurisdiction and protection of the players, but i guess time will tell.
Logged

@whollyflush on twitter
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5371


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2015, 07:18:47 PM »

these bots pay the same rake to the room that you or i pay? the room does not distinguish?

so up and until now its fair to say the incentive for the room to do much about this has been mixed at best?

Well they win at a higher rate than the average regular so take money out of the system quicker, stop it being passed about and raked. They will also cause potentially billions more in damages to the actual site, so as shitty as I think this is, I don't think Stars allowed it at all, they were too lazy and complacent. They forgot to take into account that certain players are more likely to be able to spot a bot than average, so when regulars previously emailed them, they were given the stock loony toon response, instead of being taken into account and an investigation taken place. Admittedly, one of the SNE who claims have emailed several of the previously banned, and current alleged accounts named a bunch of random people as botters since he heard the news, but his previous email could have easily have stopped this months ago. They missed several more obvious detection methods, like how has this new player emerged and played 8 hours a day 6 days a week for the past 3 months at a winrate that is exceptional.


Many people are also angry because Stars recently countered arguments that the rake was too high by showing regulars who had very solid winrates, showing it was still possible. Pretty devastating stuff and it just shows you how good someone has to be to have moved up from Stars low to midstakes, or even beat poker on any site nowadays. There is almost proof that bots have been on every single site on the internet now at this point, beating all sorts of games too while they are at it. People thought PLO was safe, and would be for years. It isn't.
Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.128 seconds with 20 queries.