poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
October 31, 2024, 11:42:28 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2274241
Posts in
66768
Topics by
16955
Members
Latest Member:
Airdraken
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
England in South Africa
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
16
17
18
19
[
20
]
21
22
Author
Topic: England in South Africa (Read 37445 times)
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1443
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #285 on:
January 17, 2016, 11:45:50 AM »
Quote from: verndog158 on January 17, 2016, 11:25:51 AM
Amazing really, what an impact he can have.
7th time he's taken 5 wickets in a single spell in test cricket! Remarkable.
Plus, broad is the leading wicket taker in test cricket in the last 5 years with 231.
Anyone know who's is 2nd and 3rd?
Jimmy and Dale Steyn?
Logged
verndog158
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2023
omgpoker
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #286 on:
January 17, 2016, 03:00:45 PM »
Quote from: buzzharvey22 on January 17, 2016, 11:45:50 AM
Quote from: verndog158 on January 17, 2016, 11:25:51 AM
Amazing really, what an impact he can have.
7th time he's taken 5 wickets in a single spell in test cricket! Remarkable.
Plus, broad is the leading wicket taker in test cricket in the last 5 years with 231.
Anyone know who's is 2nd and 3rd?
Jimmy and Dale Steyn?
Jimmy is third, steyn a fair bit back on 168 wickets, guess he's had a few injuries. Second is someone you'd probably not think of, but might groan when I say!
Broad at number 1 in the rankings too, first England bowler since Harmison in 2004!
Logged
Quote from: MassiveFish on September 25, 2014, 05:15:30 PM
ignore verndog he's a fool
'he had a deep run in EPT Barnsley'
KarmaDope
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9287
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #287 on:
January 17, 2016, 03:29:47 PM »
Quote from: verndog158 on January 17, 2016, 03:00:45 PM
Quote from: buzzharvey22 on January 17, 2016, 11:45:50 AM
Quote from: verndog158 on January 17, 2016, 11:25:51 AM
Amazing really, what an impact he can have.
7th time he's taken 5 wickets in a single spell in test cricket! Remarkable.
Plus, broad is the leading wicket taker in test cricket in the last 5 years with 231.
Anyone know who's is 2nd and 3rd?
Jimmy and Dale Steyn?
Jimmy is third, steyn a fair bit back on 168 wickets, guess he's had a few injuries. Second is someone you'd probably not think of, but might groan when I say!
Broad at number 1 in the rankings too, first England bowler since Harmison in 2004!
Graeme Swann?
Logged
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1443
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #288 on:
January 17, 2016, 04:18:45 PM »
Ashwin?
Logged
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1443
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #289 on:
January 17, 2016, 04:20:07 PM »
Nathan Lyon
Logged
vegaslover
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4619
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #290 on:
January 17, 2016, 04:24:30 PM »
Quote from: buzzharvey22 on January 17, 2016, 04:20:07 PM
Nathan Lyon
He must be close. SA play a lot less cricket than us which probs why Steyn so low
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10064
Go Ducks!
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #291 on:
January 17, 2016, 05:59:34 PM »
Mitchell Johnson??
Logged
swinebag22
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 589
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #292 on:
January 17, 2016, 06:20:36 PM »
Herath?
Logged
verndog158
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2023
omgpoker
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #293 on:
January 17, 2016, 07:27:56 PM »
Quote from: swinebag22 on January 17, 2016, 06:20:36 PM
Herath?
We have a winner! Swann would have had to take loads of poles to still be there if he retired 2 years ago! Lyon was on the list, 6/7th maybe. Johnson wasnt
Logged
Quote from: MassiveFish on September 25, 2014, 05:15:30 PM
ignore verndog he's a fool
'he had a deep run in EPT Barnsley'
fatcatstu
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 744
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #294 on:
January 22, 2016, 10:50:33 AM »
Whyyyyyyyyyyy play Chris Woakes?
WHYYYYYY?
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #295 on:
January 22, 2016, 12:34:24 PM »
Quote from: fatcatstu on January 22, 2016, 10:50:33 AM
Whyyyyyyyyyyy play Chris Woakes?
WHYYYYYY?
finn is injured. woakes did well in durban
results aside, who else would you expect the selectors to pick? he was clearly the next in line
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
fatcatstu
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 744
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #296 on:
January 22, 2016, 01:02:48 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on January 22, 2016, 12:34:24 PM
Quote from: fatcatstu on January 22, 2016, 10:50:33 AM
Whyyyyyyyyyyy play Chris Woakes?
WHYYYYYY?
finn is injured. woakes did well in durban
results aside, who else would you expect the selectors to pick? he was clearly the next in line
As I said halfway through the last test. Footitt.
Perfect chance to see what he can do. Left handed, rapid, gives us something different to a very poor version of Jimmy Anderson who has never really done it in international cricket, a few performances apart.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #297 on:
January 22, 2016, 01:07:59 PM »
Quote from: fatcatstu on January 22, 2016, 01:02:48 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on January 22, 2016, 12:34:24 PM
Quote from: fatcatstu on January 22, 2016, 10:50:33 AM
Whyyyyyyyyyyy play Chris Woakes?
WHYYYYYY?
finn is injured. woakes did well in durban
results aside, who else would you expect the selectors to pick? he was clearly the next in line
As I said halfway through the last test. Footitt.
Perfect chance to see what he can do. Left handed, rapid, gives us something different to a very poor version of Jimmy Anderson who has never really done it in international cricket, a few performances apart.
but thats incorrect. after durban, when Finn went down woakes was going to be selected 100% of the time.
if Footitt was showing it in the nets he'd have been in earlier in the tour. As it is you don't just hand out test caps to "see what he can do"
last time england did that, kerrigan at the oval, it was appalling.
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #298 on:
January 22, 2016, 01:11:15 PM »
its like people suddenly calling for bairstow not to keep wicket
he's always had a technical flaw, doesn't twist his hips for the low ones
now he drops two and suddenly people want Buttler back in, because of course Buttler's keeping has improved sitting in the Holiday Inn for a month.....
results orientated short term nonsense
you take the rough with the smooth with batsmen-wicketkeepers. neither are alan knott or bob taylor.
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
fatcatstu
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 744
Re: England in South Africa
«
Reply #299 on:
January 22, 2016, 01:18:50 PM »
I havent called for Bairstow to be dropped, yes, he should be taking some of these chances, but he will improve, and offers the team more with the bat than Butler does.
Woakes has played both white ball and red ball cricket now for England, and has hardly excelled, you know exactly what he is going to give you, he is a worse bowler than Stokes for me, yet he is meant to be our 3rd seamer.
From the noises coming out of the England camp, Footitt is far from pleasant to face in the nets, but England have always been conservative in their selections, hence why it took so long to get Taylor into the team. Out bowling attack needs variety, which it doesnt have with this current look.
When Anderson retires, I have no doubt that Woakes will be the one the plonk in to replace him, that fills me with dread.
The Kerrigan example is a bit extreme if you ask me! Yes, he was pants, but it shouldnt stop you from throwing someone in there if they look like they could have that X factor that international attacks need. Woakes is definitely NOT that man. Footitt could be, but I fear that we will never find out.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
16
17
18
19
[
20
]
21
22
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...