AA on A77 flop... River decision????

[theprawnidentity]

I had a spot yesterday that's both sort of interesting and not at the same time.  Playing a 1/2 game on Sky, I don't know anything about villain but suspect they're a fish as they're not playing a full stack.

We m/r button to £4 with  
Villain playing £137 to start calls from BB

Flop  

Check Check (Fairly obvious I would have thought)

Turn    Check Check  (Would usually bet most turns to try and start building a pot but this feels like an odd one as theres still not really much out there to get any sort of value from)

River    Villain bets £4.50 (into £9), we raise to £15.50 they jam £135.  

Thoughts on all streets, particularly river appreciated?

[lucky_scrote]

I would bet turn in the hope he will call with K high. You will only get one street of value from this most of the time so may as well bet the turn, if he rivers a boat you might get lucky and get two streets.

Obviously there is no river decision here, cry yourself to sleep and muck it.

[dakky]

bet flop

[rfgqqabc]

Not folding river as I think he bets bigger with quads and we are underrepped.

I would always check the flop.

[PathFinder]

Not folding river as I think he bets bigger with quads and we are underrepped.

I would always check the flop.

Surely the reason villian doesn't bet bigger is because we are under-repped??

[rfgqqabc]

Not folding river as I think he bets bigger with quads and we are underrepped.

I would always check the flop.

Surely the reason villian doesn't bet bigger is because we are under-repped??

If I have quads vs an inelastic calling range (I.e a calling range of ax+) then it is non sensical to bet a small size vs an opponent with no perceived bluffing range. We are better off betting large with everything, and I feel like this is a concept that is instinctual rather than something that is learnt. It looks really dumb to call the river looking back. Hard to fold tho.

[cambridgealex]

Not folding river as I think he bets bigger with quads and we are underrepped.

I would always check the flop.

Surely the reason villian doesn't bet bigger is because we are under-repped??

If I have quads vs an inelastic calling range (I.e a calling range of ax+) then it is non sensical to bet a small size vs an opponent with no perceived bluffing range. We are better off betting large with everything, and I feel like this is a concept that is instinctual rather than something that is learnt. It looks really dumb to call the river looking back. Hard to fold tho.

I think guy not playing a full stack is not thinking like this. He's thinking "i'll try and milk him for a little bet". Then he gets raised and he's like whoop "he has the ace", gets greedy and shoves.

[PathFinder]

Is there a small chance villian can have 1010? Would play similar to quads. Obviously pre flop would be a little nitty for 10s but not completely unreasonable

[shipitgood]

The massive over bet jam On sky really looks like quads, always the nuts when this happens!  A x or  1010 would be played differently by villian