So much so I can't go to sleep til I've gotten it out of my system. It's not a relatively important hand to anything in particular, I just want to see what other people think.
Anyway, we're playing a blonde $5 tournament. I'm in the BB with
and about 2500 blinds 30/60, Sark is in the sb with rougly 3000. There are two limpers, then Sark raises it up to 180, now the raise has me thinking because it's looking for action and not enough to scare limpers away, and Sark has been playing fairly tight so I think he has a big pair and I'm quite confident that I can throw away top pair if I hit and run into resistance. Both limpers also call making the pot 720. The flop comes
and Sark checks, I bet 240 here, partly to build the pot and to find out who else might have a king. One limper calls (he has about 1000 left), the other folds, and Sark then moves all-in. Whoops! Now, at this point, I actually declared on the chatbox I thought I was behind, there were only two hands I felt Sark could have, which he could check/raise all-in in this manner, which were AK or JJ. But because it was an STT, I decided to lump it in, the other limper came too with his K2. Of course, Sark had the
and scooped a monster pot. If it had been a big MTT event, I think I could've thrown the hand away, which is where my question comes in? Would you throw away my hand in this position in an MTT or an STT? Do you think the betting pattern suggests strongly enough that I'm beat?
Author