blonde poker forum

Community Forums => Betting Tips and Sport Discussion => Topic started by: david3103 on January 11, 2012, 09:34:51 PM



Title: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: david3103 on January 11, 2012, 09:34:51 PM
If the sending off of Kpmpany spoilt Sunday's game, what's spoilt this one?

Would it have been improved by a sending off?

I just applied paint to a wall, off to watch it dry now


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 11, 2012, 09:37:34 PM
Joe Hart/ Pepe Reina



Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 11, 2012, 09:39:16 PM
The 2nd leg


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pokerfan on January 11, 2012, 09:40:46 PM
The 2nd leg


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 11, 2012, 09:41:46 PM
Nasri being decapitated.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 09:45:30 PM
Why wasn't Johnson sent off if Kompany's red was correct ?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 11, 2012, 09:46:51 PM
Why are Carling Cup semi's two legs anyway?

Just play it at a neutral venue.

Or better still, scrap the whole competition.



Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TightEnd on January 11, 2012, 09:49:28 PM
Its the first leg of two, was never going to be a thriller....

I agree 2 leg semi's are an anachronism by the way. One leg, extra time, pens. Easy


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 11, 2012, 09:51:36 PM
Why are Carling Cup semi's two legs anyway?

Just play it at a neutral venue.

Or better still, scrap the whole competition.



Agree. Scrap the FA trophy and make the league cup for the championship-league two


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 11, 2012, 09:53:44 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 11, 2012, 09:57:22 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Snowball on January 11, 2012, 09:58:19 PM
Anytime I have seen Kolorov he has been the worst Player on the Park by quite some distance, why does he still get a game?
I take it he's on 10000000000000 quid a week and nobody wants him???


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 11, 2012, 10:01:51 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

The League Cup should be an under 23's competition for the Premier League sides. I don't care if people think it devalues it, having half the teams put out 30 year old journeyman for their one game of the season is what really devalues it.

United saw to it that the FA Cup would forever be ruined when they fecked off to that useless tournament rather than play in the FA Cup.

Something needs to be done to reinvigorate both competitions.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: david3103 on January 11, 2012, 10:06:56 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

The League Cup should be an under 23's competition for the Premier League sides. I don't care if people think it devalues it, having half the teams put out 30 year old journeyman for their one game of the season is what really devalues it.

The FA saw to it that the FA Cup would forever be ruined when they sent Manchester United off to that useless tournament in an attempt to win favour for their aborted World Cup 2008 bid

Something needs to be done to reinvigorate both competitions.

fyp


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 11, 2012, 10:09:14 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

The League Cup should be an under 23's competition for the Premier League sides. I don't care if people think it devalues it, having half the teams put out 30 year old journeyman for their one game of the season is what really devalues it.

United saw to it that the FA Cup would forever be ruined when they fecked off to that useless tournament rather than play in the FA Cup.

Something needs to be done to reinvigorate both competitions.

Giving the FA Cup winner a Champions League spot is the only answer.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 11, 2012, 10:10:39 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

The League Cup should be an under 23's competition for the Premier League sides. I don't care if people think it devalues it, having half the teams put out 30 year old journeyman for their one game of the season is what really devalues it.

The FA saw to it that the FA Cup would forever be ruined when they sent Manchester United off to that useless tournament in an attempt to win favour for their aborted World Cup 2008 bid

Something needs to be done to reinvigorate both competitions.

fyp

Rubbish, nobody forced United to go. No doubt they faced some pressure, but if there was any club strong enough to stand up and say no it was United. You didn't and it's have an incredibly negative effect ever since.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TightEnd on January 11, 2012, 10:11:39 PM
I agree that both competitions are a shadow of what they used to be

The League cup will never go as it is the flagship comp of the Football League. I tend to think it should exclude Premiership clubs though

The FA cup still has a lot of importance for non-premiership sides, mainly for the 45% gate receipts if you do get the Old Trafford or Emirates draw

there are fewer shocks (much better pitches, bigger gap top division and bottom divisions)  which also makes it less exciting


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 11, 2012, 10:14:49 PM
Camel I was waiting for somebody to say that.

If we gave the FA cup winner the 4th spot soon it would no longer be there.

If teams like portsmouth (millwall/cardiff/pompey have also been runners up to teams already in champs league so would therefore qualify) our coefficent ould BOMB if those teams were to qualify. Soon we would drop behind italy spain and germany (only top 3 leagues get 4 spots) and we would have shot ourself in the foot.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 11, 2012, 10:15:51 PM

Giving the FA Cup winner a Champions League spot is the only answer.

Disagree there. You don't need a tough cup run in order to actually win the thing. If the path opens up for you and you get that bit of luck you'll see a side like Portsmouth win it, as they did.

The league's the true test of a team's ability over the course of the entire season and is surely the only fair way to reward teams with CL spots.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 10:22:41 PM
I want both Cups to stay, would love it if we just made the final of one.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 11, 2012, 10:25:14 PM
Carling Cup >>>>>> FA Cup for me


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 10:27:14 PM
Carling Cup >>>>>> FA Cup for me

Surprised anyone would think this, why ?

Agree the FA Cup doesn't have the appeal it did but would much rather win the FA Cup than the Carling Cup.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 11, 2012, 10:29:20 PM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

Hi Keith,

How you been mate?

There have been 40 games in the Prem this season with either one goal or less and 7 that ended 3-2 either way, so tonight's game is nearer the norm. Tho Sundays FA cup game being a str8 knock out tie instead of tonight's 2 leg affair deffo makes a difference.

Those teams you listed are the best in the country and far more likely to provide good games but in general the entertainment value of football has declined in most major leagues in recent years if you use goals scored as the barometer. Probably because the best players end up at a small selection of clubs.

Take Spain for example, most people put La Liga forward as the best/most exciting league in the world but almost every game we see in the UK features Bacra or Real. No doubt they are the most exciting games goals wise but they aren't the norm. For all the plaudits given to La Liga there have been more 0-0 games there this season than any of the 5 big country leagues (23), Italy in second (20) and 58 games in Spain featured 1 goal or less. So the norm in that league too is for less scoring in games featuring average teams, the opposite of what we see on TV.

The main reason for the big drop in goals in Spain this season is prob the same reason as Engalnd, best players end up at big clubs but the other huge factor this year is the lack of money that these clubs now have to reinvest.



Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 10:32:45 PM
0-0 games can be as exciting as a 3-2.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 11, 2012, 10:34:55 PM
0-0 games can be as exciting as a 3-2.

That's true but that happens a very small % of the time doesn't it?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 11, 2012, 10:36:03 PM
Rather win the FA Cup obv but as a fan the FA cup ruins a perfectly good weekend league schedule.

It's a cup for big boys now. Success by most teams is regarded as hanging around long enough to play a big team.
If you're team is struggling or doing well in the league players get rested irrespective of the league they are in and who their opponents are.

Carling cup keeps itself midweek, big boys don't really take it as seriously so there is more chance of somebody beating them but also get to see their young talent.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 10:40:31 PM
0-0 games can be as exciting as a 3-2.

That's true but that happens a very small % of the time doesn't it?

I just think some games that aren't on TV are great games that we miss out on, some that are choosing, such as tonights game are pretty boring games. Overall though I still think it's good viewing as long as you actually like football and we are lucky that there are so many televised games now compared to 20 years ago.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 11, 2012, 10:42:52 PM
I like the Cup weekends, and the buzz of the draw for the next round when we are still in it, there was a good few loud ooohhhs and ahhhss in my local during the draw on Sunday.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 11, 2012, 10:47:43 PM
0-0 games can be as exciting as a 3-2.

That's true but that happens a very small % of the time doesn't it?

I just think some games that aren't on TV are great games that we miss out on, some that are choosing, such as tonights game are pretty boring games. Overall though I still think it's good viewing as long as you actually like football and we are lucky that there are so many televised games now compared to 20 years ago.

That's deffo tru but the one thing having so many games on TV has highlighted is that football is now a sport that in most cases is not decided solely by the participants, as Sundays game showed. The fact that the sending off made the game so exciting shouldn't be forgotten.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 11, 2012, 10:49:40 PM
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 12, 2012, 12:10:14 AM
its football, Sunday's exciting game was an anomaly, tonight's more like the norm.

The Premiership has been fantastic this season.

Man City, Tottenham and Arsenal are an absolute joy to watch.

Some of the most exciting games I've ever seen.

But the Carling Cup and even the FA Cup are a waste of time.

Let's just have the league and Europe.

Hi Keith,

How you been mate?

There have been 40 games in the Prem this season with either one goal or less and 7 that ended 3-2 either way, so tonight's game is nearer the norm. Tho Sundays FA cup game being a str8 knock out tie instead of tonight's 2 leg affair deffo makes a difference.

Those teams you listed are the best in the country and far more likely to provide good games but in general the entertainment value of football has declined in most major leagues in recent years if you use goals scored as the barometer. Probably because the best players end up at a small selection of clubs.

Take Spain for example, most people put La Liga forward as the best/most exciting league in the world but almost every game we see in the UK features Bacra or Real. No doubt they are the most exciting games goals wise but they aren't the norm. For all the plaudits given to La Liga there have been more 0-0 games there this season than any of the 5 big country leagues (23), Italy in second (20) and 58 games in Spain featured 1 goal or less. So the norm in that league too is for less scoring in games featuring average teams, the opposite of what we see on TV.

The main reason for the big drop in goals in Spain this season is prob the same reason as Engalnd, best players end up at big clubs but the other huge factor this year is the lack of money that these clubs now have to reinvest.



Hi Phil,

I can't remember a game this season between 2 of the top 6 which hasn't been fantastic. Chelsea v Arsenal, Man Utd v Arsenal, Utd v City, Tottenham v City etc etc.

Agreed an awful lot of the other teams are negative and produce boring matches, but the current top 6 (with the possible exception of Chelsea) include some of the best attacking footballers on the planet.

It really has been a joy to watch.

Best league in the world.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: NoflopsHomer on January 12, 2012, 12:40:47 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 12, 2012, 12:42:31 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: NoflopsHomer on January 12, 2012, 12:44:53 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Who is that then?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 12, 2012, 12:51:31 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Who is that then?

Ba obv.

Honest opinion about Newcastle is that Pardew has got them super fit. They run til the 90th minute and are very dangerous in the last 10 minutes of games.

Dropping Obertain has definitely improved the side, and Krul has been a pleasant surprise. Collocini has been good, definitely proved me wrong. And I have never seen a winger work as hard as Jonas does. Shame his end product doesn't match his effort.

However, you are still in a false position imo, not enough quality in the side, far too reliant on Ba's goals. Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor + whoever plays alongside Demba aren't premiership standard.

Top half finish and Pardew deserves the freedom of the cty imo.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: NoflopsHomer on January 12, 2012, 02:12:25 AM
No mention of Tiote or Cabaye? Tiote would probably get into any side in the Premiership bar Man City.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: toddswain on January 12, 2012, 02:15:41 AM
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o88ZbQ9UJmc


After tonights game, pretty scummy by guys filming, so com Nasri is just like, top of the league, my cars faster than yours, cya later


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Horneris on January 12, 2012, 03:28:23 AM
haha great vid, go on Samir!


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 03:37:42 AM
Prefer this video myself:

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFS4tEQj5M4


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Matt50 on January 12, 2012, 08:52:42 AM
I love the carling cup!!


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: superwomble on January 12, 2012, 09:42:43 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Just seen your avatar and signature - nice :)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 11:29:35 AM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Who is that then?

Ba obv.

Honest opinion about Newcastle is that Pardew has got them super fit. They run til the 90th minute and are very dangerous in the last 10 minutes of games.

Dropping Obertain has definitely improved the side, and Krul has been a pleasant surprise. Collocini has been good, definitely proved me wrong. And I have never seen a winger work as hard as Jonas does. Shame his end product doesn't match his effort.

However, you are still in a false position imo, not enough quality in the side, far too reliant on Ba's goals. Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor + whoever plays alongside Demba aren't premiership standard.

Top half finish and Pardew deserves the freedom of the cty imo.

Hi Keith,

I'm going to bite.

Little bit confused about your post here. How much of Newcastle have you seen this year?

I think you are missing out on one big piece of info here which is that there are ALOT of bad teams in the Prem this year. I think that if Pardew didn't manage to get us a top half finish he should seriously take a hard look at himself. I think anything less than 9th would be a huge underachievement.

Describing Collocini as "good" is the biggest understatement of the year, he has been the best defender in the premiership bar absolutely none.

Cabaye was without doubt the best buy in the summer, remember we bought him for 5m Euro's. Alongside Tiote they are the best midfield pairing in the premiership and compliment eachothers game fantastically. They would both get in any other side in the premiership. City included.

Yes Ba is good, but again that was a great buy that allowed us to spend money on other players.

Confused about the criticism of both Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor they have both been almost ever present in the meanest defence in the country over the last 4 months. Simpson throws his body on the line and wins us points just like Ba does, I'm not sure if you saw the Man United match, but Simpsons clearance at 2-0 with 20 minutes to go was just as important for gaining 3 points as Ba's goal was in the first half.

We also have the best keeper in the premiership at the moment.

We also have Ben Arfa who is arguably the most talented player in the premiership who showed last week that he is coming back to his best and scored a goal that Messi would wank over.

With our policy of only buying players under 26, the future at NUFC looks extremely bright.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 12, 2012, 11:31:48 AM
Love that Camel and pleno are back on this board.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 11:31:56 AM

Describing Collocini as "good" is the biggest understatement of the year, he has been the best defender in the premiership bar absolutely none.


I take it you're a Newcastle fan?  ::)

Christ, just got to the bit about Tiote and Cabaye being the best partnership in the league.

Oh dear.

Edit: Fuck me, just read it all.

Given what you've said Pleno

Your team is:

Krul

X X Collocini X
Ben Arfa Tiote Cabaye X
Ba X

So you're effectively 5 good players away from having the best team in the league? What a load of rubbish.

Also, as for the meanest defence bollocks, the following teams have a better defensive record than you lot in the league this season:

Man City
Man Utd
Spurs
Liverpool
Sunderland
Everton
Swansea

Whilst Chelsea have conceded exactly the same amount of goals.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TheChipPrince on January 12, 2012, 11:42:02 AM
 ;booder;


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:11:33 PM

Describing Collocini as "good" is the biggest understatement of the year, he has been the best defender in the premiership bar absolutely none.


I take it you're a Newcastle fan?  ::)

Christ, just got to the bit about Tiote and Cabaye being the best partnership in the league.

Oh dear.

Edit: Fuck me, just read it all.

Given what you've said Pleno

Your team is:

Krul

X X Collocini X
Ben Arfa Tiote Cabaye X
Ba X

So you're effectively 5 good players away from having the best team in the league? What a load of rubbish.

Also, as for the meanest defence bollocks, the following teams have a better defensive record than you lot in the league this season:

Man City
Man Utd
Spurs
Liverpool
Sunderland
Everton
Swansea

Whilst Chelsea have conceded exactly the same amount of goals.

I only pointed out things I disagreed with Camel.

We have Jonas who is such an important player to the team and adds pace/power and defensive cover to our defence. So put him in the X.

We have Davide Santon (Italian u21 captain and already played numerous times for Italy which is hard to do when you're only 20) who has been MOTM everytime he has played and has been described by Jose Mourinho as PHENOMINAL and ONE OF THE BEST I'VE EVER WORKED WITH. Many other "neutrals" on here have commented on him icluding Maldini who is known to have a good understanding.

So we now have 7 stars? not bad for a team that a manager should receive freedom of the city if he manages to keep us in the top half.

I'm unsure why the Cabaye/Tiote thing upsets you so much? Could you name a better partnership? Giggs/Carrick? Nah. Merieles/Romeu? Nah. Barry/Toure? Nah. Adam/Henderson? Nah.

Squad Players

Guthire
Ryan Taylor
Best
Shola
Williamson
Obertan

Can all add something to the squad.

By the way we have done all this by spending less money than we've received from transfers.

We have the best scouting system in the country, by what Camel says, we have one of the best managers in the country, we have one of if not the best striker in the country, we have without doubt the best defender in the country, we have one of if not the best goalkeeper in the country who should stay here for the next 10 years and we have one of if not the best central midfield partnerships in the country.

Regarding the goals conceded, you are absolutely correct although we conceded the bulk of our goals (4 vs norwich, 3 vs west brom) with a comedy back line due to injurys. Hopefully Ashley will bring in some players to make sure this doesn't happen in the future.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:12:24 PM
;booder;

as a football socut and an opinion i respect, what exactly do you disagree with?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TheChipPrince on January 12, 2012, 12:21:39 PM
;booder;

as a football socut and an opinion i respect, what exactly do you disagree with?

Has Colocinni really been the best DEF in the country this season?  Better than Kompany?  I can't disagree to the point of an argument over it as I don't see enough Prem games or Newcastle games.   

Is Ben Arfa really the most talented player in the Prem, even when he gets 100% fit?  I think if I asked 10 random football fans not one would have him in their top 5.  He may prove to be decent of course, but done diddly squat so far, injury being the reason of course.

The meanest defence?  Have I read the table wrong or do you have like the 6/7th best defence?

Tiote/Cabaye are the 'best cen mid pairing' in the Prem?  Better than Toure & Silva? 

Krul has had a great season as is probably the most improved keeper, but is he better than Reina/Hart?

All imo :)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 12, 2012, 12:24:06 PM
When you wrote 7 stars I giggled.
When you listed 'squad players who wouldn't (and some didn't) look out of place in the championship I laughed
When you  said your pairing is better than Toure/Barry I gasped.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 12:25:12 PM

I only pointed out things I disagreed with Camel.

We have Jonas who is such an important player to the team and adds pace/power and defensive cover to our defence. So put him in the X.

We have Davide Santon (Italian u21 captain and already played numerous times for Italy which is hard to do when you're only 20) who has been MOTM everytime he has played and has been described by Jose Mourinho as PHENOMINAL and ONE OF THE BEST I'VE EVER WORKED WITH. Many other "neutrals" on here have commented on him icluding Maldini who is known to have a good understanding.

So we now have 7 stars? not bad for a team that a manager should receive freedom of the city if he manages to keep us in the top half.

I'm unsure why the Cabaye/Tiote thing upsets you so much? Could you name a better partnership? Giggs/Carrick? Nah. Merieles/Romeu? Nah. Barry/Toure? Nah. Adam/Henderson? Nah.

Squad Players

Guthire
Ryan Taylor
Best
Shola
Williamson
Obertan

Can all add something to the squad.

By the way we have done all this by spending less money than we've received from transfers.

We have the best scouting system in the country, by what Camel says, we have one of the best managers in the country, we have one of if not the best striker in the country, we have without doubt the best defender in the country, we have one of if not the best goalkeeper in the country who should stay here for the next 10 years and we have one of if not the best central midfield partnerships in the country.

Regarding the goals conceded, you are absolutely correct although we conceded the bulk of our goals (4 vs norwich, 3 vs west brom) with a comedy back line due to injurys. Hopefully Ashley will bring in some players to make sure this doesn't happen in the future.

I count 8 stars. I'm an Arsenal fan and I don't think we have 8 stars. Then again I'm a bit more realistic about just how good my team are...

Pleno, if every quote attributable to any young player coming through was true, then we'd have had 20 Maradona's by now, 10 more Messi's etc etc. Fact is Inter were happy to let Santon go, so let's not get too far ahead of ourselves with him, eh?

The thing with the Tiote/Cabaye thing is that in order to be completely fair, you have to compare it with midfield trios too as some teams use that. You can't simply pick Barry and Toure out as they're part of a 3 man midfield. In any case, I'd have Man City's, Arsenal's and Spurs' midfield trios over your duo.

Best scouting networks? Was this the one that sent you down, or a new one? Best manager? Isn't this the manager fired from Charlton and Southampton? You're starting to sound like a Liverpool fan. For years they've had the best players in every position yet funnily enough never finished top.

We're halfway through the season and after a blistering start you've dropped off the pace somewhat. You're a good side without being much more than that. I expect you to finish 7th or 8th which would be a fantastic achievement. Leave it at that rather than making ridiculous posts telling us how you've got 8 of the best players in the league, perhaps?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 12, 2012, 12:29:28 PM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Who is that then?

Ba obv.

Honest opinion about Newcastle is that Pardew has got them super fit. They run til the 90th minute and are very dangerous in the last 10 minutes of games.

Dropping Obertain has definitely improved the side, and Krul has been a pleasant surprise. Collocini has been good, definitely proved me wrong. And I have never seen a winger work as hard as Jonas does. Shame his end product doesn't match his effort.

However, you are still in a false position imo, not enough quality in the side, far too reliant on Ba's goals. Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor + whoever plays alongside Demba aren't premiership standard.

Top half finish and Pardew deserves the freedom of the cty imo.

Hi Keith,

I'm going to bite.

Little bit confused about your post here. How much of Newcastle have you seen this year?

I think you are missing out on one big piece of info here which is that there are ALOT of bad teams in the Prem this year. I think that if Pardew didn't manage to get us a top half finish he should seriously take a hard look at himself. I think anything less than 9th would be a huge underachievement.

Describing Collocini as "good" is the biggest understatement of the year, he has been the best defender in the premiership bar absolutely none.

Cabaye was without doubt the best buy in the summer, remember we bought him for 5m Euro's. Alongside Tiote they are the best midfield pairing in the premiership and compliment eachothers game fantastically. They would both get in any other side in the premiership. City included.

Yes Ba is good, but again that was a great buy that allowed us to spend money on other players.

Confused about the criticism of both Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor they have both been almost ever present in the meanest defence in the country over the last 4 months. Simpson throws his body on the line and wins us points just like Ba does, I'm not sure if you saw the Man United match, but Simpsons clearance at 2-0 with 20 minutes to go was just as important for gaining 3 points as Ba's goal was in the first half.

We also have the best keeper in the premiership at the moment.

We also have Ben Arfa who is arguably the most talented player in the premiership who showed last week that he is coming back to his best and scored a goal that Messi would wank over.

With our policy of only buying players under 26, the future at NUFC looks extremely bright.



blimey....

The single biggest mistake all football fans make imo is massively overrating the players they see play most often but I have never seen someone do it that extent.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:30:51 PM

I only pointed out things I disagreed with Camel.

We have Jonas who is such an important player to the team and adds pace/power and defensive cover to our defence. So put him in the X.

We have Davide Santon (Italian u21 captain and already played numerous times for Italy which is hard to do when you're only 20) who has been MOTM everytime he has played and has been described by Jose Mourinho as PHENOMINAL and ONE OF THE BEST I'VE EVER WORKED WITH. Many other "neutrals" on here have commented on him icluding Maldini who is known to have a good understanding.

So we now have 7 stars? not bad for a team that a manager should receive freedom of the city if he manages to keep us in the top half.

I'm unsure why the Cabaye/Tiote thing upsets you so much? Could you name a better partnership? Giggs/Carrick? Nah. Merieles/Romeu? Nah. Barry/Toure? Nah. Adam/Henderson? Nah.

Squad Players

Guthire
Ryan Taylor
Best
Shola
Williamson
Obertan

Can all add something to the squad.

By the way we have done all this by spending less money than we've received from transfers.

We have the best scouting system in the country, by what Camel says, we have one of the best managers in the country, we have one of if not the best striker in the country, we have without doubt the best defender in the country, we have one of if not the best goalkeeper in the country who should stay here for the next 10 years and we have one of if not the best central midfield partnerships in the country.

Regarding the goals conceded, you are absolutely correct although we conceded the bulk of our goals (4 vs norwich, 3 vs west brom) with a comedy back line due to injurys. Hopefully Ashley will bring in some players to make sure this doesn't happen in the future.

I count 8 stars. I'm an Arsenal fan and I don't think we have 8 stars. Then again I'm a bit more realistic about just how good my team are...

Pleno, if every quote attributable to any young player coming through was true, then we'd have had 20 Maradona's by now, 10 more Messi's etc etc. Fact is Inter were happy to let Santon go, so let's not get too far ahead of ourselves with him, eh?

The thing with the Tiote/Cabaye thing is that in order to be completely fair, you have to compare it with midfield trios too as some teams use that. You can't simply pick Barry and Toure out as they're part of a 3 man midfield. In any case, I'd have Man City's, Arsenal's and Spurs' midfield trios over your duo.

Best scouting networks? Was this the one that sent you down, or a new one? Best manager? Isn't this the manager fired from Charlton and Southampton? You're starting to sound like a Liverpool fan. For years they've had the best players in every position yet funnily enough never finished top.

We're halfway through the season and after a blistering start you've dropped off the pace somewhat. You're a good side without being much more than that. I expect you to finish 7th or 8th which would be a fantastic achievement. Leave it at that rather than making ridiculous posts telling us how you've got 8 of the best players in the league, perhaps?

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:31:36 PM
Gonna admit Newcastle are half-decent yet Keith? :D

One good player, who is going to leave in the transfer window, doesn't make Newcastle a good team Floppy!

Who is that then?

Ba obv.

Honest opinion about Newcastle is that Pardew has got them super fit. They run til the 90th minute and are very dangerous in the last 10 minutes of games.

Dropping Obertain has definitely improved the side, and Krul has been a pleasant surprise. Collocini has been good, definitely proved me wrong. And I have never seen a winger work as hard as Jonas does. Shame his end product doesn't match his effort.

However, you are still in a false position imo, not enough quality in the side, far too reliant on Ba's goals. Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor + whoever plays alongside Demba aren't premiership standard.

Top half finish and Pardew deserves the freedom of the cty imo.

Hi Keith,

I'm going to bite.

Little bit confused about your post here. How much of Newcastle have you seen this year?

I think you are missing out on one big piece of info here which is that there are ALOT of bad teams in the Prem this year. I think that if Pardew didn't manage to get us a top half finish he should seriously take a hard look at himself. I think anything less than 9th would be a huge underachievement.

Describing Collocini as "good" is the biggest understatement of the year, he has been the best defender in the premiership bar absolutely none.

Cabaye was without doubt the best buy in the summer, remember we bought him for 5m Euro's. Alongside Tiote they are the best midfield pairing in the premiership and compliment eachothers game fantastically. They would both get in any other side in the premiership. City included.

Yes Ba is good, but again that was a great buy that allowed us to spend money on other players.

Confused about the criticism of both Danny Simpson and Ryan Taylor they have both been almost ever present in the meanest defence in the country over the last 4 months. Simpson throws his body on the line and wins us points just like Ba does, I'm not sure if you saw the Man United match, but Simpsons clearance at 2-0 with 20 minutes to go was just as important for gaining 3 points as Ba's goal was in the first half.

We also have the best keeper in the premiership at the moment.

We also have Ben Arfa who is arguably the most talented player in the premiership who showed last week that he is coming back to his best and scored a goal that Messi would wank over.

With our policy of only buying players under 26, the future at NUFC looks extremely bright.



blimey....

The single biggest mistake all football fans make imo is massively overrating the players they see play most often but I have never seen someone do it that extent.

Again instead of general trolololol bad post, pick our a quote and we can debate rather than argue or ridicule.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 12:32:58 PM


Regarding the goals conceded, you are absolutely correct although we conceded the bulk of our goals (4 vs norwich, 3 vs west brom) with a comedy back line due to injurys. Hopefully Ashley will bring in some players to make sure this doesn't happen in the future.

Forgot to address this.

Pleno, you can't chop and change a statement in order to help it fit your argument. Football is a squad game, we (Arsenal fan here) have the following players out injured: Djourou, Sagna, Gibbs, Jenkinson, Coquelin, Vermaelen and Santos. We do not have recognised full backs, but that is not an excuse as football is a squad game.

You can't therefore take out two results in order to help make your point. In fact, in order to be fair, you can take those two results away and I'll take the 8 goals and 4 goals United and Blackburn put past us respectively.

Just so you know, we'd be on 16 goals whilst you'd be on 18 goals conceded. And we all know how dodgy the Arsenal defence is, eh?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:35:02 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?




Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 12, 2012, 12:35:55 PM
Mother always said never argue with someone who wont change their mind!

Where do you think your best 11 ranks in the prem?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 12:36:02 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



I said, quite clearly, that I expect you to finish 7th or 8th, so why would I possibly take that bet? Unless of course you think you'll finish in the bottom half?

The point I'm trying to make is you're clearly very misty-eyed when it comes to your club as you've pretty much made out that 7 of the first starting XI are the best players in their position in the country.

That my friend, is a load of shite.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:36:47 PM
Mother always said never argue with someone who wont change their mind!

Where do you think your best 11 ranks in the prem?

7th.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 12, 2012, 12:37:29 PM
They have been done above, you are entitled to your opinion on your team but you do not have the best defender, or midfield pairing in the Prem. You don't have the best defence.

Trust me, If David Santon was that good Mourinho would have him in his squad. Newcastle are a good team tho and the manager and most importantly given the stick he was getting the Chairman have done a very good job in getting big wage earners off the wage bill and signing top value players to replace them. Tiote, Cabaye and Ba are all very good, you have simply over rated them in the grand scheme.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 12, 2012, 12:37:58 PM
BOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Pleno is back.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:38:59 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



I said, quite clearly, that I expect you to finish 7th or 8th, so why would I possibly take that bet? Unless of course you think you'll finish in the bottom half?

The point I'm trying to make is you're clearly very misty-eyed when it comes to your club as you've pretty much made out that 7 of the first starting XI are the best players in their position in the country.

That my friend, is a load of shite.

I think 3 of them (Krul, Collocini and Ba) are the best in their positions at the moment.

I think Cabaye and Tiote are the best midfield partnership (as a 2)

I think Jonas is hard working and fits in perfectly with the team, this doesn't mean he is in the best 11 players in the country.

I think when fit Steven Taylor is a perfect fit for Collocini but again would not be in the best 11 players in the country.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 12, 2012, 12:39:39 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



I said, quite clearly, that I expect you to finish 7th or 8th, so why would I possibly take that bet? Unless of course you think you'll finish in the bottom half?

The point I'm trying to make is you're clearly very misty-eyed when it comes to your club as you've pretty much made out that 7 of the first starting XI are the best players in their position in the country.

That my friend, is a load of shite.

I think 3 of them (Krul, Collocini and Ba) are the best in their positions at the moment.

I think Cabaye and Tiote are the best midfield partnership (as a 2)

I think Jonas is hard working and fits in perfectly with the team, this doesn't mean he is in the best 11 players in the country.

I think when fit Steven Taylor is a perfect fit for Collocini but again would not be in the best 11 players in the country.

Ok you got me, this is clearly a level.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 12:40:59 PM

I think 3 of them (Krul, Collocini and Ba) are the best in their positions at the moment.


Please pass me whatever the hell it is that you're smoking.

Hart is better than Krul.

Vidic is better than Collocini.

Van Persie is better than Ba.

It took me 5 seconds to come up with those three names so how you've come to the conclusion that they're the best is beyond me, it really is.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: gatso on January 12, 2012, 12:41:47 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



what are you trying to bet on? he said you'd finish 7th or 8th, you think you're going to win the league or possibly finish even higher than that. both of these are top half finishes


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: ACE2M on January 12, 2012, 12:42:47 PM
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally

amazing


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:44:19 PM
BTW when everybody was telling us that we would get relegated I said this back in August.

We getting a really nice squad together now. We should sign 3 players before the window and have a really good chance of top 10 finish.

GK. Krul/Harper. Krul has been magnificant so far, with Harper on the bench offering experience/guidance he could turn into a top 3 keeper this year                                                                                              8/10
RB. Simpson/Ryan Taylor   Steady. Not great. Ryan Taylor has scored 2/3 goals this season and can offer great service both on the wings and set pieces                                                                                          6/10
LB. Nobody/Ferguson We will sign a 6-8m defender who will really help the defence and then we have young Shane Ferguson who is a good talent                                                                                               8/10
CB. Collocini For me he is top 3 CB in prem. Our captain now and I wish I had curly hair too                                                                                                                                                                                   9/10
CB. Steven Taylor/Williamson Local lad, wears his heart on the sleeve. Will score 5 important goals a season and is great in the air too. Mike Williamson is a great cover defender who makes no mistakes                   9/10

DM Tiote/Gosling Tiote is our Essien. Breaks everything up and is composed on the ball. Slow pre season but expect him to be POTS this year, Gosling is a fantastic back up DM for us. Very happy here                   9/10
CM1 Cabaye/Haris Vuckic Was the playmaker last year for Lille who won the French league. Everything goes through him and he is very important player. Vuckic is a young but promosing replacement                 8/10
AM Ben Arfa When fit he will be one of the most exciting players in the prem, he showed it last season and every Newcastle fan cant stop talking about him                                                                                        9/10

RW Marveux Fast, athletic, skillful. Back from injury now and will be permanent fixture in our team. He will scare defences if we can keep him fit.                                                                                                        8/10
LW Jonas Guttierez Starts for Argentina's national team. Very direct, very fast/strong. Can help out the midfield/defence and will create alot too. Has had 2 seasons now so is v.settled.                                                8/10

ST We are expected to buy somebody this week for around £10m, spending some of the Carroll money. Very excited about who they can bring in.   We also have Ba who has impressive record at West Ham last year        ?/10

Bench    8/10

Harper
Barton
Ryan Taylor
Williamson
Smith
Gosling
Vuckic
Sammy Ameobi
Shola
Best
Ba
Lovenkrands


Lol pads




rotflmfao. Bless ya.... Be happy if you get 11th-12th.



Which team would Collocini not get in Monda? Spurs & Lpool
Which team would Tiote not get in? Man U, Lpool, maybe Chelsea.





lolz. You definitely are a glass half full man.


You all said the same thing in August.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:45:50 PM

Well we both are so sure, lets bet on Newcastle finishing in the top half?



I said, quite clearly, that I expect you to finish 7th or 8th, so why would I possibly take that bet? Unless of course you think you'll finish in the bottom half?

The point I'm trying to make is you're clearly very misty-eyed when it comes to your club as you've pretty much made out that 7 of the first starting XI are the best players in their position in the country.

That my friend, is a load of shite.

I think 3 of them (Krul, Collocini and Ba) are the best in their positions at the moment.

I think Cabaye and Tiote are the best midfield partnership (as a 2)

I think Jonas is hard working and fits in perfectly with the team, this doesn't mean he is in the best 11 players in the country.

I think when fit Steven Taylor is a perfect fit for Collocini but again would not be in the best 11 players in the country.

Ok you got me, this is clearly a level.

Whats a level?

Collocini has been the best centre half this season. It doesnt matter if Vidic was better 2 years ago.

Hart and Krul have been on par IMO.

Ba has been as good as RVP.



Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 12:51:03 PM

Whats a level?

Collocini has been the best centre half this season. It doesnt matter if Vidic was better 2 years ago.

Hart and Krul have been on par IMO.

Ba has been as good as RVP.



I'm confused. There's just no way you can actually believe what you've just written.

I'd take the following cbs over Collocini:

Kompany, Vidic and Vermaelen.

Hart has been better than Krul. No doubt about it. Krul has been excellent but Hart's been far and away the stand out keeper.

Your ridiculous bias shines through over the Ba issue though. There's no doubt he's done really well for you this season, but he's nowhere near the player Van Persie is.

I'd be shocked if you could find another poster on this forum who agrees with you that those three are the best in their respective positions.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 12, 2012, 12:53:50 PM
Colo>>>>>>>>Vermaelen


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 12, 2012, 12:53:52 PM
Don't think he's saying Colo is the best CB more that he is playing the best. Vermaelen been injured and shuffled around the defence but good in patches, Vidic has hardly played this season and Kompany is obv great but he's been sent of twice this season already. He thinks Colo is in the best form. Maybe the others can raise their above him but pleno doesn't think they have at the moment.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 12:57:21 PM
Don't think he's saying Colo is the best CB more that he is playing the best. Vermaelen been injured and shuffled around the defence but good in patches, Vidic has hardly played this season and Kompany is obv great but he's been sent of twice this season already. He thinks Colo is in the best form. Maybe the others can raise their above him but pleno doesn't think they have at the moment.

Exactly. And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini, but I understand why you'd (SOLARIS) think so as you admitted you havn't watched many games this season, and probably watch alot of MOTD.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: ACE2M on January 12, 2012, 12:57:38 PM

Whats a level?

Collocini has been the best centre half this season. It doesnt matter if Vidic was better 2 years ago.

Hart and Krul have been on par IMO.

Ba has been as good as RVP.



I'm confused. There's just no way you can actually believe what you've just written.

I'd take the following cbs over Collocini:

Kompany, Vidic and Vermaelen.

Hart has been better than Krul. No doubt about it. Krul has been excellent but Hart's been far and away the stand out keeper.

Your ridiculous bias shines through over the Ba issue though. There's no doubt he's done really well for you this season, but he's nowhere near the player Van Persie is.

I'd be shocked if you could find another poster on this forum who agrees with you that those three are the best in their respective positions.


i sort of agree with pads although its all obviously subjective.

I think there is an amount of top team bias from you lot, best player in the top teams is always going to look standout better.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: outragous76 on January 12, 2012, 01:00:19 PM
Pleno

for a team with the best keeper, best centre back, awesome midfield and the best striker, id suggest you were massively underperforming. Id be gutted if i were you!

(http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo151/outragous76/premleague.png)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 01:01:29 PM
Don't think he's saying Colo is the best CB more that he is playing the best. Vermaelen been injured and shuffled around the defence but good in patches, Vidic has hardly played this season and Kompany is obv great but he's been sent of twice this season already. He thinks Colo is in the best form. Maybe the others can raise their above him but pleno doesn't think they have at the moment.

Vermaelen's been excellent. It's no surprise the minute he was fit we looked a different side at the back. He's an incredibly dominating centre-back who offers a lot on the ball and is a ridiculous threat going forward given his position.

Vidic is injured at the moment sure, but he's a world class centre back who would walk into any side in the world when fit.

Kompany's brilliant. You can ignore the red card vs Liverpool as it wasn't one. Either way he's absolutely superb.

I see where you're coming from, but if that's what Pleno means (and I don't think he does) then what time-scale is he basing Collocini's form on?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 01:03:00 PM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 01:05:02 PM
Don't think he's saying Colo is the best CB more that he is playing the best. Vermaelen been injured and shuffled around the defence but good in patches, Vidic has hardly played this season and Kompany is obv great but he's been sent of twice this season already. He thinks Colo is in the best form. Maybe the others can raise their above him but pleno doesn't think they have at the moment.

Vermaelen's been excellent. It's no surprise the minute he was fit we looked a different side at the back. He's an incredibly dominating centre-back who offers a lot on the ball and is a ridiculous threat going forward given his position.

Vidic is injured at the moment sure, but he's a world class centre back who would walk into any side in the world when fit.

Kompany's brilliant. You can ignore the red card vs Liverpool as it wasn't one. Either way he's absolutely superb.

I see where you're coming from, but if that's what Pleno means (and I don't think he does) then what time-scale is he basing Collocini's form on?

Last 12 months.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 01:05:17 PM

i sort of agree with pads although its all obviously subjective.

I think there is an amount of top team bias from you lot, best player in the top teams is always going to look standout better.

You either agree or you don't. It's not that hard.

Are Krul, Collocini and Ba the best players in the league in their respective positions?

Yes or no?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: ACE2M on January 12, 2012, 01:12:39 PM

i sort of agree with pads although its all obviously subjective.

I think there is an amount of top team bias from you lot, best player in the top teams is always going to look standout better.

You either agree or you don't. It's not that hard.

Are Krul, Collocini and Ba the best players in the league in their respective positions?

Yes or no?

Debateable

Krul doesn't get the same protection as Hart but has been a great shot stopper and totally rock solid from set pieces etc - would like to look up opta stats on shots on their respective golas etc
Collicini is the big doubt for me in pads thinking, i think vermalen is the best CB in the world - but based on the seasons they are having its prob Kompany
Ba doesn't get anything like the service that RVP gets but he's got almost as good a record. Again trawling some opta stats would be good. Wish we'd signed him, i'm sure that dodgy knee will flare up soon...


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: gatso on January 12, 2012, 01:16:57 PM

i sort of agree with pads although its all obviously subjective.

I think there is an amount of top team bias from you lot, best player in the top teams is always going to look standout better.

You either agree or you don't. It's not that hard.

Are Krul, Collocini and Ba the best players in the league in their respective positions?

Yes or no?

Debateable

Krul doesn't get the same protection as Hart but has been a great shot stopper and totally rock solid from set pieces etc - would like to look up opta stats on shots on their respective golas etc
Collicini is the big doubt for me in pads thinking, i think vermalen is the best CB in the world - but based on the seasons they are having its prob Kompany
Ba doesn't get anything like the service that RVP gets but he's got almost as good a record. Again trawling some opta stats would be good. Wish we'd signed him, i'm sure that dodgy knee will flare up soon...


but he's got the best defence in the country in front of him


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: bobby1 on January 12, 2012, 01:38:09 PM
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally

Hi ACE,

When I first saw this I thought it must have been tampered with to make it look that amazing.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 01:39:10 PM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.

I really don't. You obviously havn't seen Collocini play reguarly. As you have already admitted in the thread, I have and I have seen plenty of Vidic so please bore off. Watch us play QPR tonight if you like, I'm sure Colo will get another MOM.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 01:44:30 PM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.

I really don't. You obviously havn't seen Collocini play reguarly. As you have already admitted in the thread, I have and I have seen plenty of Vidic so please bore off. Watch us play QPR tonight if you like, I'm sure Colo will get another MOM.

Please quote me on where I said that.

When you fail to find the post, because it doesn't exist, I would love an apology for you making up a complete lie in order to try and aid your argument.

Best of luck on the search.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: maldini32 on January 12, 2012, 01:45:09 PM
;booder;

as a football socut and an opinion i respect, what exactly do you disagree with?

Has Colocinni really been the best DEF in the country this season?  Better than Kompany?  I can't disagree to the point of an argument over it as I don't see enough Prem games or Newcastle games.   

Is Ben Arfa really the most talented player in the Prem, even when he gets 100% fit?  I think if I asked 10 random football fans not one would have him in their top 5.  He may prove to be decent of course, but done diddly squat so far, injury being the reason of course.

The meanest defence?  Have I read the table wrong or do you have like the 6/7th best defence?

Tiote/Cabaye are the 'best cen mid pairing' in the Prem?  Better than Toure & Silva? 

Krul has had a great season as is probably the most improved keeper, but is he better than Reina/Hart?

All imo :)

One scout to another thanks for writing all that, agree agree agree.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TheChipPrince on January 12, 2012, 01:55:40 PM
;booder;

as a football socut and an opinion i respect, what exactly do you disagree with?

Has Colocinni really been the best DEF in the country this season?  Better than Kompany?  I can't disagree to the point of an argument over it as I don't see enough Prem games or Newcastle games.   

Is Ben Arfa really the most talented player in the Prem, even when he gets 100% fit?  I think if I asked 10 random football fans not one would have him in their top 5.  He may prove to be decent of course, but done diddly squat so far, injury being the reason of course.

The meanest defence?  Have I read the table wrong or do you have like the 6/7th best defence?

Tiote/Cabaye are the 'best cen mid pairing' in the Prem?  Better than Toure & Silva? 

Krul has had a great season as is probably the most improved keeper, but is he better than Reina/Hart?

All imo :)

One scout to another thanks for writing all that, agree agree agree.

lol, hows it going so far?

shoot, just remembered you asked me for those templates a couple of months back, PM me if you still need anything


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: maldini32 on January 12, 2012, 02:00:13 PM
;booder;

as a football socut and an opinion i respect, what exactly do you disagree with?

Has Colocinni really been the best DEF in the country this season?  Better than Kompany?  I can't disagree to the point of an argument over it as I don't see enough Prem games or Newcastle games.   

Is Ben Arfa really the most talented player in the Prem, even when he gets 100% fit?  I think if I asked 10 random football fans not one would have him in their top 5.  He may prove to be decent of course, but done diddly squat so far, injury being the reason of course.

The meanest defence?  Have I read the table wrong or do you have like the 6/7th best defence?

Tiote/Cabaye are the 'best cen mid pairing' in the Prem?  Better than Toure & Silva? 

Krul has had a great season as is probably the most improved keeper, but is he better than Reina/Hart?

All imo :)

One scout to another thanks for writing all that, agree agree agree.

lol, hows it going so far?

shoot, just remembered you asked me for those templates a couple of months back, PM me if you still need anything

Nah mate its all good. The templates were for a friend.

Its going alright apart from its fuckin freezin!

Still looking for the future Johnson et al.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: redsimon on January 12, 2012, 02:16:15 PM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.

I really don't. You obviously havn't seen Collocini play reguarly. As you have already admitted in the thread, I have and I have seen plenty of Vidic so please bore off. Watch us play QPR tonight if you like, I'm sure Colo will get another MOM.

sure playing tonight.

how are you seeing so many newcastle games anyway, aren't you in Spain?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: AndrewT on January 12, 2012, 02:20:41 PM
At first I did fear for QPR on Sunday when I read this, but then I remembered we managed a 0-0 draw with Newcastle earlier in the season, which I think makes us better than Barcelona, so we should be OK.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 02:21:29 PM
Ha yeh I meant Sunday :D

Internet mate, stream every Newcastle game and theres a bar in Gib that shows every single Newcastle match on big screens etc.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 02:23:05 PM
At first I did fear for QPR on Sunday when I read this, but then I remembered we managed a 0-0 draw with Newcastle earlier in the season, which I think makes us better than Barcelona, so we should be OK.


New manager/player hype ting. Still managed to keep a clean sheet whilst our star striker was on ramadan. You did manage to get beat off Wigan though which I guess makes you the worst team in the prem.

#RejectsRangers


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 12, 2012, 02:23:28 PM
end the debate right now.

Krul not the best, concerns about his kicking from open play, but he willl be very, very good and is already better than Reina. Hart still the man to beat in that position though Krul not very far behind and already light years ahead of Cech and De Gea.

Colo. He's the love of my life, I'd let him shag my wife, I wish I had curly hair too. On form, the best defender in England bar absolutely none. I've never seen Vermaelen or Kompany put the best strikers in his back pocket as often as Colo has this season. If you disagree, you're not watching us enough. Or you're a Citeh/Arsenal fan. Once Vidic is fit again I'm certain he'll come back to be number 1 in this position quickly.

Ba. Great goalscorer, has a lot to offer the team, will be a miss. Goals make a striker though, which I guess makes him the second best striker in England at the moment, behind the one man of Arsenal's one man team, RVP.

Tiote and Cabaye are fantastic. Cabaye is missing a sharpness against the bigger boys, but I'd take either of them over Chelsea's mid, Gareth Barry's best years are 90 years ago, etc.

It's all about perspective. We need a new right back (imo) because Danny S, for all his last ditch defending which has been great is too likely to cause a calamity.

We also suffer from small squad syndrome which cost us against WBA and Norwich, but that's part of the thrill of watching NUFC. Tank the big teams and then get held 0-0 by Swansea at home in the most frustrating game ever. #upsanddownsofthetoon


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 12, 2012, 02:25:32 PM
Ha yeh I meant Sunday :D

Internet mate, stream every Newcastle game and theres a bar in Gib that shows every single Newcastle match on big screens etc.

confirmed. watching with Pleno and his (admittedly) rose tinted glasses is absolutely hilarious and great fun. I recommend it.

not as rose tinted as most of you think though. :)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: 77dave on January 12, 2012, 02:26:12 PM
I remember watching the QPR v Newcastle game earlier in the season and they battered you. They were very unlucky not to leave with all 3 points.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 12, 2012, 02:27:59 PM
I remember watching the QPR v Newcastle game earlier in the season and they battered you. They were very unlucky not to leave with all 3 points.

it's an easy game when the referee only gives decisions to one team. We played well but never looked like winning it. They were defo assisted by the ref.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: redsimon on January 12, 2012, 02:46:28 PM
Ha yeh I meant Sunday :D

Internet mate, stream every Newcastle game and theres a bar in Gib that shows every single Newcastle match on big screens etc.

Fair enough. I haven't watched much Prem footy, but definitely you are performing above expectations.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 02:53:55 PM
Ha yeh I meant Sunday :D

Internet mate, stream every Newcastle game and theres a bar in Gib that shows every single Newcastle match on big screens etc.

Fair enough. I haven't watched much Prem footy, but definitely you are performing above expectations.

perhaps blondes expectations yes!


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: sweet potata! on January 12, 2012, 03:09:28 PM
end the debate right now.

Krul not the best, concerns about his kicking from open play, but he willl be very, very good and is already better than Reina. Hart still the man to beat in that position though Krul not very far behind and already light years ahead of Cech and De Gea.

Colo. He's the love of my life, I'd let him shag my wife, I wish I had curly hair too. On form, the best defender in England bar absolutely none. I've never seen Vermaelen or Kompany put the best strikers in his back pocket as often as Colo has this season. If you disagree, you're not watching us enough. Or you're a Citeh/Arsenal fan. Once Vidic is fit again I'm certain he'll come back to be number 1 in this position quickly.

Ba. Great goalscorer, has a lot to offer the team, will be a miss. Goals make a striker though, which I guess makes him the second best striker in England at the moment, behind the one man of Arsenal's one man team, RVP.

Tiote and Cabaye are fantastic. Cabaye is missing a sharpness against the bigger boys, but I'd take either of them over Chelsea's mid, Gareth Barry's best years are 90 years ago, etc.

It's all about perspective. We need a new right back (imo) because Danny S, for all his last ditch defending which has been great is too likely to cause a calamity.

We also suffer from small squad syndrome which cost us against WBA and Norwich, but that's part of the thrill of watching NUFC. Tank the big teams and then get held 0-0 by Swansea at home in the most frustrating game ever. #upsanddownsofthetoon


WALOFS !!!!

Krul is just a flavour of the month at the moment , come back to me when has has a few golden gloves on his mantlepiece or when he plays and handles the pressures of  being with a massive club were every mistake is slaughtered (De Gea). Krul is what I would call free rolling at Newcastle, nobody is paying too much attention to him and he gets well worked over in a lot of games, so has a chance to stand out. TRy stepping up to a big club and we will then see what hes made of and then we can talk about him being in the same league as Pepe Reina.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: ACE2M on January 12, 2012, 03:17:46 PM
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally

Hi ACE,

When I first saw this I thought it must have been tampered with to make it look that amazing.

i thought exactly the same :)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TightEnd on January 12, 2012, 03:18:47 PM
Think Krul is a talent, already an excellent shot stopper but quite a way behind the experienced keepers in terms of general game management (positioning, reading the game, marshalling a defence etc). I would consider Hart has this too, and is the best around in the PL

I think Reina (just a little) and (especially) Cech are in (slow) decline, Cech's being borne of loss of confidence after his head injuries but what they lack in they make up for in experience and craft

Vorm, Al Habsi etc are also flavours of the month because of flashy shot-stopping. Both talents, but for me only Vorm shows the potential to push on whereas Al Habsi will always be flaky.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: dino1980 on January 12, 2012, 03:21:21 PM
Modric/Parker best CM partnership in the Prem this season ainec.

Also, I'd argue Vorm has been as good, if not better, than Krul this season.

Would check the numbers myself if i were in front of a computer, but how many games have the tiote/cabaye partnership actually started for Newcastle this season? They've both had injury/disciplinary issues right?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 12, 2012, 03:28:26 PM
Tighty

As a goalkeeper I cringe at Al Habsi and his inability to land back on his feet when he jumps.
Biggest camera saver ever.

Shouldnt we just change this to a 'premier league containment' type thread?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 03:29:19 PM
Although we are talking about talent.

I'd just like to point out. Tiote + Cabaye= 7m

Anderson + Carrick = over 30m

Silva + Toure = over 60m

Modric + Parke= over 20m

Mata + Ramires= over 25m

Adam + Henderson = over 30m

Arteta= more than Cabaye+ Tiote

I won't even get into wages..

This is what I was trying to say about our scouting system

Ba+ Best= 1m


Rooney+ Hernandez= 50m+

Torress+ Drogba = 70m+

Aguero+ Ballotelli= 70m+

RVP+ Chamak= over 20m?

Again won't get into wages or cost of back up players.

When Newcastle won't spend 10m on every squad member like the top 5/6 do it is impossible for us to finish top of the league. Whilst it remeains like this if we finish "top of the rest" whilst spending less then we will be doing very well.




Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: 77dave on January 12, 2012, 03:33:28 PM
Try Gerard and Lucas for Liverpool and see what that price comes in at. Not a bad duo for £2m.

Modric/Parker best midfield for me this season.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: TheChipPrince on January 12, 2012, 03:33:46 PM
Good stats + figures Pleno, and certainly points out the value for money Newcastle have had.

But its a completely seperate argument to saying 'they're the best' etc


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 03:36:56 PM
Try Gerard and Lucas for Liverpool and see what that price comes in at. Not a bad duo for £2m.

Modric/Parker best midfield for me this season.

try adam and henderson both who have played more games this season. quite a bad duo for 30m, our whole team doesnt even cost that much :D


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 03:37:45 PM
Good stats + figures Pleno, and certainly points out the value for money Newcastle have had.

But its a completely seperate argument to saying 'they're the best' etc

I genuinely think that the Newcastle players have outshone all of the other combos this year with the exception on RVP (par) and Modric/Parker.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: 77dave on January 12, 2012, 03:40:14 PM
Try Gerard and Lucas for Liverpool and see what that price comes in at. Not a bad duo for £2m.

Modric/Parker best midfield for me this season.

try adam and henderson both who have played more games this season. quite a bad duo for 30m, our whole team doesnt even cost that much :D

Make your mind up, 1 minute your talking about this season, then past 12 months now back to this season again.
Henderson has spend most of the season at RM.

If everyone is fit Gerard/Lucas is the midfield duo.

How would this thread be going if Tiote + Cabaye were injured.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: 77dave on January 12, 2012, 03:40:58 PM
Good stats + figures Pleno, and certainly points out the value for money Newcastle have had.

But its a completely seperate argument to saying 'they're the best' etc

I genuinely think that the Newcastle players have outshone all of the other combos this year with the exception on RVP (par) and Modric/Parker.

We all believe you.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 03:44:09 PM
Try Gerard and Lucas for Liverpool and see what that price comes in at. Not a bad duo for £2m.

Modric/Parker best midfield for me this season.

try adam and henderson both who have played more games this season. quite a bad duo for 30m, our whole team doesnt even cost that much :D

Make your mind up, 1 minute your talking about this season, then past 12 months now back to this season again.
Henderson has spend most of the season at RM.

If everyone is fit Gerard/Lucas is the midfield duo.

How would this thread be going if Tiote + Cabaye were injured.

incorrect. i was asked how ong has collocini been performing like this. i responded 12 mionths. everything else has been about this season.

tiote was injured and guthrie played and was motm for 2 out of the 4 games he played, another guy we signed for a couple of million whilst you spent millions on Stewart Downing who has yet to score if i'm correct.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: redsimon on January 12, 2012, 04:11:03 PM
Ha yeh I meant Sunday :D

Internet mate, stream every Newcastle game and theres a bar in Gib that shows every single Newcastle match on big screens etc.

Fair enough. I haven't watched much Prem footy, but definitely you are performing above expectations.

perhaps blondes expectations yes!

Definitely above this blondes' :) Think I picked them in ChipRich's competition to go down and Pardew to be first managerial casualty. (Then again I picked Torres to be top scorer!)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Dubai on January 12, 2012, 04:15:39 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 04:26:12 PM
On this seasons form (which we are talking about) he obviously doesn't compare due to injury. But agree he is a very good and one of if not the best and most consistent midfield players who has everything.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: ACE2M on January 12, 2012, 04:26:54 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

you've obviously been spending your win on getting high.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Alverton on January 12, 2012, 05:04:47 PM
Good thread.  Everyone ignoring the Ridic OP, and turning it into a great football discussion. 


Also this not getting enough love.
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: kinboshi on January 12, 2012, 05:15:51 PM
Although we are talking about talent.

I'd just like to point out. Tiote + Cabaye= 7m

Anderson + Carrick = over 30m

Silva + Toure = over 60m

Modric + Parke= over 20m

Mata + Ramires= over 25m

Adam + Henderson = over 30m

Arteta= more than Cabaye+ Tiote

I won't even get into wages..

This is what I was trying to say about our scouting system

Ba+ Best= 1m


Rooney+ Hernandez= 50m+

Torress+ Drogba = 70m+

Aguero+ Ballotelli= 70m+

RVP+ Chamak= over 20m?

Again won't get into wages or cost of back up players.

When Newcastle won't spend 10m on every squad member like the top 5/6 do it is impossible for us to finish top of the league. Whilst it remeains like this if we finish "top of the rest" whilst spending less then we will be doing very well.





Always better to use correct figures when trying to back up a position with figures.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 12, 2012, 06:15:55 PM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.

I really don't. You obviously havn't seen Collocini play reguarly. As you have already admitted in the thread, I have and I have seen plenty of Vidic so please bore off. Watch us play QPR tonight if you like, I'm sure Colo will get another MOM.

Please quote me on where I said that.

When you fail to find the post, because it doesn't exist, I would love an apology for you making up a complete lie in order to try and aid your argument.

Best of luck on the search.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Ricardov83 on January 12, 2012, 06:27:50 PM
Good thread.  Everyone ignoring the Ridic OP, and turning it into a great football discussion. 


Also this not getting enough love.
Talking of exciting sport check this out.

http://www.brobible.com/videos/watch/chinese-womens-volleyball-rally

Probably because it's volleyball on a football thread.  Pretty impressive nonetheless.   


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 12, 2012, 06:41:30 PM
2011/2012  prem X1

RVP
Bale silva parker Yaya Mata
A.Cole  Colocini kompany Richards
Hart

You may now all stop saying x is best in their position.

Ps Modric/silva is close and Ba is just another Zaki/reyes


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 12, 2012, 08:25:43 PM
2011/2012  prem X1

RVP
Bale silva parker Yaya Mata
A.Cole  Colocini kompany Richards
Hart

You may now all stop saying x is best in their position.

Ps Modric/silva is close and Ba is just another Zaki/reyes


the team has mata in who only played for 4 months in an rxtremely underperforming chelsea team. Nani and young both been better imo.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 12, 2012, 11:54:04 PM
I remember watching the QPR v Newcastle game earlier in the season and they battered you. They were very unlucky not to leave with all 3 points.

it's an easy game when the referee only gives decisions to one team. We played well but never looked like winning it. They were defo assisted by the ref.

We played terrible and got absolutely battered, was the only game this season where I've been really disappointed with the performance. Wish QPR had've waited until after Sunday to sack Warnock with the run they where on.

Also rofls at Krul being better than Reina, Reina is the best in the lge for me.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 13, 2012, 12:00:15 AM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 13, 2012, 02:23:16 AM
Also rofls at Krul being better than Reina, Reina is the best in the lge for me.

Krul has made 2 huge errors this season, Krul hasn't. And those are the only 2 I've seen, maybe more....


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: tikay on January 13, 2012, 06:45:45 AM
Also rofls at Krul being better than Reina, Reina is the best in the lge for me.

Krul has made 2 huge errors this season, Krul hasn't. And those are the only 2 I've seen, maybe more....

Even the very best can make huge errors.......;)


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 10:59:21 AM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: The Camel on January 13, 2012, 11:21:40 AM
And I also think that its debatable that Vidic is better than Collocini,

Need anyone say anymore?  :D

That's one hell of a quote for us all to remember.

I really don't. You obviously havn't seen Collocini play reguarly. As you have already admitted in the thread, I have and I have seen plenty of Vidic so please bore off. Watch us play QPR tonight if you like, I'm sure Colo will get another MOM.

Just bought my ticket for Sunday, see you there Pleeeeeeeeeeeno!

Doubt Colocini will be MoM, that would involve QPR doing some attacking.

Unlikely imo.

You R's!


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: pleno1 on January 13, 2012, 12:16:19 PM
Wish I could be there mate.

Collocini is a silent MOM, always plays nigh on perfectly, but goes about his business quietly so that he doesn't get noticed. The sign of a classy centre half.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 13, 2012, 12:33:20 PM
@Camel,

I hope the fans give you a rendition of The Coloccini Song

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwEaN-TLnRk


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 13, 2012, 12:46:13 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: outragous76 on January 13, 2012, 12:47:46 PM
LOL @ whoever recorded the colloccini song not knowing the words


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 12:53:10 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.

Arguing semantics because your wrong. Brilliant.

Nice to see you didn't put up an argument for your inclusion of Nasri. Then again it's pointless arguing with people who actually watch him play so I don't blame you.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 13, 2012, 01:01:45 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.

Arguing semantics because your wrong. Brilliant.

Nice to see you didn't put up an argument for your inclusion of Nasri. Then again it's pointless arguing with people who actually watch him play so I don't blame you.

How am I wrong ? Bale is a midfielder and I think he's better than Wilshire so explain which bit I got wrong.

As for Nasri, your an Arsenal fan.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 13, 2012, 01:15:24 PM
Nasri has provided a good few assists this year and I think he is harshly criticised. I rhink both players would be wanted by any team in the world outside of barca/bayern/real. Yet I think Wiltshire already having a serious injury along with a questions about his temprement/personal life.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:16:12 PM

As for Nasri, your an Arsenal fan.

Exactly, so I got to watch him a great deal more than you did. Glad we can agree.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:18:24 PM
Nasri has provided a good few assists this year and I think he is harshly criticised. I rhink both players would be wanted by any team in the world outside of barca/bayern/real. Yet I think Wiltshire already having a serious injury along with a questions about his temprement/personal life.

What questions would they be?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Acidmouse on January 13, 2012, 01:25:19 PM
Nasri since switch total fail.


Listen to experts, commentators etc they all say the same thing.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 13, 2012, 01:34:05 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.

Arguing semantics because your wrong. Brilliant.

Nice to see you didn't put up an argument for your inclusion of Nasri. Then again it's pointless arguing with people who actually watch him play so I don't blame you.
You really can't have a debate can you? Anyone with a different opinion is just wrong.
Monda owned you here and you react like a little brat.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:36:02 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.

Arguing semantics because your wrong. Brilliant.

Nice to see you didn't put up an argument for your inclusion of Nasri. Then again it's pointless arguing with people who actually watch him play so I don't blame you.
You really can't have a debate can you? Anyone with a different opinion is just wrong.
Monda owned you here and you react like a little brat.

Is a winger a midfielder to you? To me he's a winger. There's a difference that is so unbelievably obvious I really fail to see how you can't see it. Comparing Bale to Wilshere is a complete and utter waste of time.

On top of that, including Nasri is a sure sign of someone who doesn't actually watch football all that much as they'd be aware that he's been average at City and really wasn't as great as he was made out to be at Arsenal.

Feel free to tell me what part of what I've said is wrong.

Your fascination with trying to insult me is flattering, I must say. You're going to have to do a lot better as your insults are pretty poor. Good luck.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 13, 2012, 01:43:02 PM
i'll bite.

i'd play bale in wilshire's position before wilshire.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:45:49 PM
i'll bite.

i'd play bale in wilshire's position before wilshire.

Are you and Pleno a comedy duo?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 13, 2012, 01:46:49 PM
I thought a winger was someone who played Left Midfield or Right Midfield ?

As for form, that's what it is, form. He's a class player and has done more than Wilshire due to the fact Wilshire is 20 years old and has played 38 games thus is still unproven so I'd rather have Nasri. It's also not that unusual for someone to start slowly at a new club so I'm sure Mancini's not to worried about Nasri.

You come across very aggressive and patronising but I'm sure this is just the way you are and not just another one of the internet's special people.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:50:25 PM
I thought a winger was someone who played Left Midfield or Right Midfield ?

As for form, that's what it is, form. He's a class player and has done more than Wilshire due to the fact Wilshire is 20 years old and has played 38 games thus is still unproven so I'd rather have Nasri. It's also not that unusual for someone to start slowly at a new club so I'm sure Mancini's not to worried about Nasri.

You come across very aggressive and patronising but I'm sure this is just the way you are and not just another one of the internet's special people.

Wilshere was infinitely better than Nasri at Arsenal. The fact you don't know this is because you didn't watch him. Why you're trying to arguing with someone who watched them play every single minute of every game is beyond me.

It's like me trying to tell you who Newcastle's best players are. I couldn't because I know I don't watch the whole 90 minutes of every one of their games.

As I've said multiple times, Nasri had 6 good months at Arsenal in his entire career there. Wilshere had an excellent season for the entirety of it.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 13, 2012, 01:55:16 PM
Like the way Wilshere is conviently forgotten even tho he is obviously the best midfielder in the prem and cost 0

Really ? He has massive potential and is already v good but no way is he the best midfielder in the Lge, I would take : Bale/Modric/Nasri/Silva/Toure ahead of him for starters.

You realise Bale is a winger and not a central midfielder like Wilshere, right?

If you'd watched Nasri at all you know he's been average at best at City this season and had half a good season at Arsenal last year before disappearing off the face of the Earth. I'd take Wilshere over him every single day of the week.

I do realise where Bale plays yes, I also realise that Dubai said midfielder not central midfielder.

Arguing semantics because your wrong. Brilliant.

Nice to see you didn't put up an argument for your inclusion of Nasri. Then again it's pointless arguing with people who actually watch him play so I don't blame you.
You really can't have a debate can you? Anyone with a different opinion is just wrong.
Monda owned you here and you react like a little brat.

Is a winger a midfielder to you? To me he's a winger. There's a difference that is so unbelievably obvious I really fail to see how you can't see it. Comparing Bale to Wilshere is a complete and utter waste of time.

Irrelevant point

Sarcy Comment

Blah

http://www.faw.org.uk/PlayerDisplay.ink?skip=0&squadno=11129&season=11/12&seasonl=2011/2012&Playertype=p (http://www.faw.org.uk/PlayerDisplay.ink?skip=0&squadno=11129&season=11/12&seasonl=2011/2012&Playertype=p)
http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/players/first_team/garethbale.html
Wales and Spurs both list Bale as a midfielder. I think it's quite reasonable for Monda to include him in a debate on midfielders if he thinks his talent is deserving of being included.
Instead of saying something like "I disagree but it's hard to compare as they play different roles, I believe Dubai was probably referring to central midfielders" you try and make somebody look a dick.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mulhuzz on January 13, 2012, 01:56:42 PM
i'll bite.

i'd play bale in wilshire's position before wilshire.

Are you and Pleno a comedy duo?

i would do anything to see both harry 'other people's players' redknapp and arsene 'i did not see the incident' wenger lose games, if that means playing two players oop, fine with me.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 13, 2012, 01:57:15 PM
I'm not trying to argue with you, I gave my opinion, just because you disagree with it and have watched them play more doesn't mean mine has to change. I am really suprised that Wenger and the Arsenal fans didn't want to snap City's hands off when they offered so much for Nasri if he was only good for 6 months, as I remember it nobody wanted him to leave ?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 01:59:32 PM

http://www.faw.org.uk/PlayerDisplay.ink?skip=0&squadno=11129&season=11/12&seasonl=2011/2012&Playertype=p (http://www.faw.org.uk/PlayerDisplay.ink?skip=0&squadno=11129&season=11/12&seasonl=2011/2012&Playertype=p)
http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/players/first_team/garethbale.html
Wales and Spurs both list Bale as a midfielder. I think it's quite reasonable for Monda to include him in a debate on midfielders if he thinks his talent is deserving of being included.
Instead of saying something like "I disagree but it's hard to compare as they play different roles, I believe Dubai was probably referring to central midfielders" you try and make somebody look a dick.

I really didn't think it needed explaining. I would have thought it would be fairly obvious that comparing Bale and Wilshere was a complete waste of time. My mistake for assuming you're clever enough to make this fairly obvious distinction.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: chatban on January 13, 2012, 02:00:17 PM
Numerous assaults Solaris.

Seems a bit of a villain.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 13, 2012, 02:07:13 PM
I'm not trying to argue with you, I gave my opinion, just because you disagree with it and have watched them play more doesn't mean mine has to change. I am really suprised that Wenger and the Arsenal fans didn't want to snap City's hands off when they offered so much for Nasri if he was only good for 6 months, as I remember it nobody wanted him to leave ?

We didn't want a good player to join our rival's, but most of all we were all pissed off with the way in which it happened. His head was completely turned by City because of the stupid money on offer to him. He's a greedy SOB whose greed is getting in the way of his ability. There was also the fact that Arsene left it so close to the season beginning that made the situation difficult. Having lost Cesc and with no obvious replacement lined up this was the only reason some people were hoping he might stay. Had he shipped him off in the summer and brought in players before the season began things would definitely have been a lot easier for us and no-one would have cared.

Nearly any Arsenal fan you will speak too can't believe we got 25 mill for a player in his last year. It was excellent business.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: George2Loose on January 13, 2012, 02:41:30 PM
Whole who is better than who argument is pretty pointless if you ask me

Although no one did so carry on.

However I would say that saying Wilshere is the best midfielder in the prem based on one season is OTT.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 16, 2012, 09:01:04 PM
Pretty suprised to read that Nasri has the 2nd highest amount of assist in the League after Silva who the pundits say is currently the best player in the league, if that's Nasri when he's shit how good will he be when he sorts his form out.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Solaris on January 16, 2012, 09:57:54 PM
Pretty suprised to read that Nasri has the 2nd highest amount of assist in the League after Silva who the pundits say is currently the best player in the league, if that's Nasri when he's shit how good will he be when he sorts his form out.

[ ] statistics always prove a point


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: mondatoo on January 16, 2012, 10:00:25 PM
Just saying, obv statistics can be misleading but I genuinely was suprised when I read it on the updates for the City game, lots of people seem to be critical of him this season so obv he hasn't been amazing. Pretty sure you are biased though with your Arsenal connections but you aren't the first or the last to be biased about a football discussion.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: sweet potata! on January 16, 2012, 10:06:51 PM
Nasri has been rank for city, them stats are skewed because IIRC Nasri got 3/4 assists on his debut, but has beeen doin sweet fk all since. Tonight he was woeful done nothing everytime he got it, he seemed the donk in amongst the class of the rest of the City team.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: david3103 on January 17, 2012, 06:53:58 AM
Nasri has been rank for city, them stats are skewed because IIRC Nasri got 3/4 assists on his debut, but has beeen doin sweet fk all since. Tonight he was woeful done nothing everytime he got it, he seemed the donk in amongst the class of the rest of the City team.

Thought that was Gareth Barry's job...


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 24, 2012, 10:36:09 PM
Carling Cup >>>>>> FA Cup for me

Great game tonight. Hope the big boys tomorrow can match it.


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: Josedinho on January 25, 2012, 09:17:52 PM
Doing a good job so far


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: KarmaDope on January 25, 2012, 09:22:12 PM
LFC fan here for disclaimer.

Why the f**k can't we play like this every week?


Title: Re: Citeh vs LFC a question for the 'neutrals'
Post by: WPIL on January 25, 2012, 10:18:04 PM
FA Cup Winner - Promoted to Prem Div
Come on Wednesday