blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 27, 2025, 08:02:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262482 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  STT Iso-Shove Range
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: STT Iso-Shove Range  (Read 2287 times)
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 01, 2010, 04:46:09 PM »

Yes but if he is a reg then all he is bothered about is cashing, firstly.

Given that in any scenario he is left with a min of 2k, once you commit your chips I dont think he is folding much of his calling range.

Buttons range should be any high card, all suited connectors and above (ie prob top 65-70% of his range) - i havent got stove here.

If Sb folds - bb is calling ATC

if sb commits - then bb should really be  committing too, with anything that beats the buttons  range (so basically anything except bottom 25-30% of his range).

HOWEVER

I can see a good arguement for folding given that he is left with 3900 (3600 once he pays the sb blind) and will technically still be the chip daddy or equivalent  depending upon who wins if the other two get it in

I am more likely to call than fodl thou
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 01, 2010, 04:49:29 PM »


Given that in any scenario he is left with a min of 2k, once you commit your chips I dont think he is folding much of his calling range.


I don't like this. without getting into specific ranges his calling range if we flat should be atc or very close to it. his calling range if we shove is nowhere near atc
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 01, 2010, 04:52:53 PM »

I am more likely to call than fold though

But surely we're never calling though?

We either like our hand and its 'in' our isolating range, or we fold and let the BB call and hopefully win.

With the payouts being 175/75/0 its never in our interest to call here is it?

Am I levelling myself or should we invite BB along for the ride and play simple to make the top 2?
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2010, 05:08:26 PM »

I am more likely to call than fold though

But surely we're never calling though?

We either like our hand and its 'in' our isolating range, or we fold and let the BB call and hopefully win.

With the payouts being 175/75/0 its never in our interest to call here is it?

Am I levelling myself or should we invite BB along for the ride and play simple to make the top 2?

that statement refferred to me being the BB

Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Moskvich
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1002


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 01, 2010, 07:21:41 PM »

I am more likely to call than fold though

But surely we're never calling though?

We either like our hand and its 'in' our isolating range, or we fold and let the BB call and hopefully win.

With the payouts being 175/75/0 its never in our interest to call here is it?

Am I levelling myself or should we invite BB along for the ride and play simple to make the top 2?

Do we even want the bb to pass unless we're very strong and very likely to knock out the short stack?

Actually not even then I don't think, as we'll be strong enough to play it three ways and with a sidepot. My guess is that in most situations like this, getting the bb to fold is a bad thing, so you don't want to be isolating at all.

If you think the bb will fold if you shove, then I think you should probably call. The BB is not usually likely to bet into a dry sidepot post-flop unless he thinks he's got the button beat, so unless he has some sort of personal vendetta against you you're very rarely going to fold the winner post-flop and see the button win the hand.

The worst thing that can happen here - isn't it? - is that you shove and make the bb fold a hand that would have beaten the button, who beats you and leaves you crippled.

I think your range to play this hand at all should be pretty wide - 50%+? And then implicit collusion FTW, or at least the cash.
Logged
TheChipPrince
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8664



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2010, 10:36:20 AM »

I am more likely to call than fold though

But surely we're never calling though?

We either like our hand and its 'in' our isolating range, or we fold and let the BB call and hopefully win.

With the payouts being 175/75/0 its never in our interest to call here is it?

Am I levelling myself or should we invite BB along for the ride and play simple to make the top 2?

Do we even want the bb to pass unless we're very strong and very likely to knock out the short stack?

Actually not even then I don't think, as we'll be strong enough to play it three ways and with a sidepot. My guess is that in most situations like this, getting the bb to fold is a bad thing, so you don't want to be isolating at all.

If you think the bb will fold if you shove, then I think you should probably call. The BB is not usually likely to bet into a dry sidepot post-flop unless he thinks he's got the button beat, so unless he has some sort of personal vendetta against you you're very rarely going to fold the winner post-flop and see the button win the hand.

The worst thing that can happen here - isn't it? - is that you shove and make the bb fold a hand that would have beaten the button, who beats you and leaves you crippled.

I think your range to play this hand at all should be pretty wide - 50%+? And then implicit collusion FTW, or at least the cash.

I think I need to look as this aspect, flatting to invite the BB rarely crosses my mind.

I'm still not fully convinced, but it is food for thought, thanks...
Logged

The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.

RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.159 seconds with 20 queries.