425 & Jen

[Royal Flush]

We need somewhere to debate issues that affect the game.  How about the collusion issue at Walsall which Edy G discussed.  It prompted Walsall's manager to respond a few weeks later, which I doubt would've happened from the forum posts alone.

Sheriff

An issue like that would still be discussed but do we really need a 15 minute chat about how naughty the vic are?

[wormster]

Glad you liked it Tom & Homer, if we talk faster & the viewers listen quicker we can cut it down to 15 mins  

[RED-DOG]

We need somewhere to debate issues that affect the game.  How about the collusion issue at Walsall which Edy G discussed.  It prompted Walsall's manager to respond a few weeks later, which I doubt would've happened from the forum posts alone.

Sheriff

An issue like that would still be discussed but do we really need a 15 minute chat about how naughty the vic are?

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago.

[tikay]

Glad you liked it Tom & Homer, if we talk faster & the viewers listen quicker we can cut it down to 15 mins  

OK, here's the deal. We record a 1 hour show, & run the tape at double speed?

[wormster]

Glad you liked it Tom & Homer, if we talk faster & the viewers listen quicker we can cut it down to 15 mins  

OK, here's the deal. We record a 1 hour show, & run the tape at double speed?

Problem there will be that anyone who records it will think their fast forward button is stuck on their remote control!!!

[NoflopsHomer]

In all seriousness, I like the longer show. If there's something on it you don't find interesting, then turn it off. You have the power!!!

[RED-DOG]

Glad you liked it Tom & Homer, if we talk faster & the viewers listen quicker we can cut it down to 15 mins  

OK, here's the deal. We record a 1 hour show, & run the tape at double speed?

Or we could give people permission not to watch the bits they are not interested in

[Royal Flush]

We need somewhere to debate issues that affect the game.  How about the collusion issue at Walsall which Edy G discussed.  It prompted Walsall's manager to respond a few weeks later, which I doubt would've happened from the forum posts alone.

Sheriff

An issue like that would still be discussed but do we really need a 15 minute chat about how naughty the vic are?

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago.

People make these shows to make money.....sadly big brother does make money. The people upstairs have cleary decided that it would make more money as 30min show. I imagine if someone as obsessed with poker gets bored of it, and i know all the people that are talked about, then your joe bloggs ,must be asleep by the end.

[tikay]

We need somewhere to debate issues that affect the game.  How about the collusion issue at Walsall which Edy G discussed.  It prompted Walsall's manager to respond a few weeks later, which I doubt would've happened from the forum posts alone.

Sheriff

An issue like that would still be discussed but do we really need a 15 minute chat about how naughty the vic are?

I think that misses the point by a considerable margin.

blonde, & 425, both major on improving the Poker scene, making it a better place. Someone needs to, & we both do.

It had nothing to do with anyone being "naughty", it was far, far, wider than that. It was essentially, look, there was a lot of negative feedback from the players, let's try & see why, & what can be done to improve things, if indeed improving they were found to need.

Whether the shiow is 30, 60 or 15 minutes long, & whatever form blonde takes in the future, we will always lobby for change for the better. In fact, I'm kinda proud of the efforts that blonde, & 425, have made on behalf of Live Poker.

[RED-DOG]

We need somewhere to debate issues that affect the game.  How about the collusion issue at Walsall which Edy G discussed.  It prompted Walsall's manager to respond a few weeks later, which I doubt would've happened from the forum posts alone.

Sheriff

An issue like that would still be discussed but do we really need a 15 minute chat about how naughty the vic are?

I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago.

People make these shows to make money.....sadly big brother does make money. The people upstairs have cleary decided that it would make more money as 30min show. I imagine if someone as obsessed with poker gets bored of it, and i know all the people that are talked about, then your joe bloggs ,must be asleep by the end.

As viewers, we both have rights, I have the right to disagree with the people upstairs, you have the right to turn it off when you get bored.

[Royal Flush]

Sounds like an agree to disagree moment!

[wormster]

it's not a cutback that involves making (or saving) money, it's an editorial decision. IF we wanted to sell the programme on it would be a lot easier to sell as a 30 minutes programme (23 minutes 50 seconds (I think) if going to a commercial station) than a 1 hour prog.

[Royal Flush]

Thats what i mean, making money in an indirect way. By making the show 30 mins you feel its better and thus will be able to make money through an increase in viewers. I agree.

[RED-DOG]

Sounds like an agree to disagree moment!

I will only agree if you make that offer 50% shorter.

[Royal Flush]

Sounds like an agree to disagree moment!

I will only agree if you make that offer 50% shorter.