blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 10:08:39 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262358 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Performance or Points?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Performance or Points?  (Read 10909 times)
sharpy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 389



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2006, 10:45:31 PM »



  Today was the first time since 1998 that we've won our opening group game.Previous to that it was 1982.

  OK the second half was not too clever, but it's a better start than normal.
Logged

Play Up Pompey
Rooky9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2662


TheAuditor


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2006, 11:26:28 PM »

Sweden - did everything but put the ball in the net

Were we watching the same game? Sweden had 4 in defence with a man advantage and really only had some clumsy long range attempts with only 1-2 respectable attempts in the whole 45 mins they had the advantage.

well if henrik had 1 inch longer legs he would have scored 2 with a slide and should have scored with his head too

There is no point comparing the two games - different opposition and different conditions - lets just see who qualifies! I know which position I'd sooner be in!
Logged

MrMoves
It's not the principle, it's the money
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1232



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2006, 07:51:44 AM »

put it this way which team is sitting happiest right now:

England - just scrapped a win with a jammie own goal, or/
Sweden - did everything but put the ball in the net

Obviously england, even tho sweden deserve to be above them in the group, thats why points win over performances at this stage

Why is it a team who can't beat Dwight Yorke's pub side deserve to be above England?

Sweden were awful.

cos they played far better than England

Sweden, who couldn't beat Trinidad and Tobago, should be above England, who beat Paraguay.  Based on the evidence that Sweden played more attractive football against 10 men who celebrated the draw like they'd won the cup.

LOL!!!!!
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2006, 08:12:09 AM »

Whoever wins this group. play Germany in QF, I would imagine that Sweden are happier

the winners of group A and Group B wouldn't meet until the final. group B winners would most likely have to get through Brazil in the semifinal.
Logged
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2006, 10:36:14 AM »

I thought it was an excellent game and a deserved win, but i was in the pub from 9am.........
Dave, are you scottish by any chance? Cheesy
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2006, 01:16:06 PM »

Whoever wins this group. play Germany in QF, I would imagine that Sweden are happier

Why?

Germany hve the worst defence I've seen so far.
Logged
Scottish Dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7363


Im in love with Trigg!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2006, 02:44:37 PM »

put it this way which team is sitting happiest right now:

England - just scrapped a win with a jammie own goal, or/
Sweden - did everything but put the ball in the net

Obviously england, even tho sweden deserve to be above them in the group, thats why points win over performances at this stage

Why is it a team who can't beat Dwight Yorke's pub side deserve to be above England?

Sweden were awful.

cos they played far better than England

Sweden, who couldn't beat Trinidad and Tobago, should be above England, who beat Paraguay.  Based on the evidence that Sweden played more attractive football against 10 men who celebrated the draw like they'd won the cup.

LOL!!!!!

you couldnt even put the ball in your own net, you had to get someone else to do it for you, then get M Owen to run away celebrating

sweden wouldnt stoop so low
Logged

 Click to see full-size image.


Last Man Standing 2 - Champion!!               The Shrewdie's!!
thediceman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1220



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2006, 04:05:36 PM »

England:

In the World Cup.
Won their first game with no goals conceded.
Big favourites to make the second round.
Got one of the best strikers in the world to return in the knockout stages.

It's times like this I really wished I supported Scotland.  Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: June 11, 2006, 08:55:08 PM by thediceman » Logged

GlasgowBandit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5646


Global Pacifier


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2006, 04:12:53 PM »



It's times like this I really wished I supported Scotland.  Roll Eyes

Really??

Its comments like that, that make us Scots hate your poxy team more!

And Rooney is a damn fine player but I don't think he is one of the best strikers in the world!!

He plays better in the hole behind a mian striker, to be a great striker you have to have outstanding goal scoring records IMO Rooney doesn't have this yet.

COME ON THE ARGIES!!
Logged

The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2006, 04:17:50 PM »

Well there we have it from the horses mouth. That man people admire so much Martin O'Neill, has just said England will have no problems beating Sweden as they are ordinary. Didn't he manage someone once?


"And Rooney is a damn fine player but I don't think he is one of the best strikers in the world!!" -  Cheesy

I guess Larsson is though?
Logged
GlasgowBandit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5646


Global Pacifier


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2006, 04:21:37 PM »

Well there we have it from the horses mouth. That man people admire so much Martin O'Neill, has just said England will have no problems beating Sweden as they are ordinary. Didn't he manage someone once?


"And Rooney is a damn fine player but I don't think he is one of the best strikers in the world!!" -  Cheesy

I guess Larsson is though?

Well Larrson has achieved mor ein the game than Rooney has but he wasn't top of the list Iw ould compile of world class strikers.

Schevchenko
Drogba
Crespo
Henry
Ronaldo
Adriano
Luca Toni


These guys are all better strikers than Rooney.

Its fascinating that such a world class team has pinned all its hopes on one man.

You boys are up shit creek without a paddle if he comes in and gets injured - what then??
Logged

Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2006, 04:24:53 PM »

It's simple IMO, England were poor, poor teams don't win the world cup. The England defence was shocking, luckily it was meetin the paraquay attack and not that of Argentina, Holland, Italy, Brazil etc. If they had it would have been a pasting.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
The Baron
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9558


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2006, 04:25:33 PM »

And please don't tell me about the goals/game ratio he achieved in Scotland, otherwise I'm going to start telling you how good Kezman is for all the goals he scored in Holland!

Drogba? Are you kidding me? 9 goals a season for a £24 million player? Rooney scores 16 goals at 20 years old and hes not world class, Drogba scores 9 (in an amazing Chelsea side) and he is? Cheesy
« Last Edit: June 11, 2006, 04:27:24 PM by The Baron » Logged
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #28 on: June 11, 2006, 04:26:08 PM »



It's times like this I really wished I supported Scotland.  Roll Eyes

Really??

Its comments like that, that make us Scots hate your poxy team more!


COME ON THE ARGIES!!

And comments like that, that make you look daft.
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
GlasgowBandit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5646


Global Pacifier


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: June 11, 2006, 04:28:20 PM »

And please don't tell me about the goals/game ratio he achieved in Scotland, otherwise I'm going to start telling you how good Kezman is for all the goals he scored in Holland!

Drogba? Are you kidding me? 9 goals a season for a £24 million player? Roonet scores 16 goals at 20 years old and hes not world class, Drogba scores 9 (in an amazing Chelsea side) and he is? Cheesy

So you saying Larrson hasn't achived more in the game than Rooney?

Whats your fascination with Henrik?  FFS I never even brought him into this.

So you don't rate Drogba where do you put Rooney in the list then? 


Logged

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.13 seconds with 21 queries.