|
thetank
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2006, 11:13:54 AM » |
|
For all your egg pun needs.... http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=5046.0
I'd make an egg joke, but you guys have used all ovum
 |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 23, 2006, 11:16:02 AM by thetank »
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
marcro
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 23, 2006, 11:14:27 AM » |
|
But what did that chicken come out of?
I think that this is a question that only Sark can answer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jon MW
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 23, 2006, 11:15:17 AM » |
|
ok - if we are going to look at it from a genetic point of view rather than a culinary one i say that the egg came first. Creatures were laying eggs way past before the chicken evolved from another bird like creature.
And if we are specifically meaning chicken and chicken eggs, then from an evolutionary point of view something that was 'not quite a chicken' laid the first freak aberration that was a chicken egg, so it's still the egg. but is a 'chicken egg' defined by what laid it or what hatches from it. I would say that, in order for there to be a 'chicken egg' there must have been a chicken to lay it, in which case the chicken came first. A chicken egg would be the egg that hatches a chicken. The egg that was laid by the first chicken would be a chicken's egg - which would be the first chicken egg which was also a chicken's egg - but not the first chicken egg. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
|
|
|
|
BrumBilly
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 23, 2006, 11:25:20 AM » |
|
A chicken egg would be the egg that hatches a chicken.
This definition needs qualifying. IMO. I'm leaning towards Claw's position.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 23, 2006, 12:47:09 PM » |
|
let's forget the chicken/chicken's eggs thing for a minute. I think 'chicken and egg' is just a generic phrase meaning "which came first, an egg laying creature or an egg", so should not be read to mean exclusively chickens and chicken/chicken's eggs. In order for there to have ever been any type of egg from which a creature hatched, there must have been an adult creature to lay said egg. Therefore, I still believe the 'chicken' came first. We really need a definitive answer on this thread from someone that was around at the time  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
Wardonkey
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 23, 2006, 01:33:57 PM » |
|
How can you leave the chicken out of the equation?
The question has always involved a chicken not some undefined 'egg laying creature'.
Removing the chicken is radical step, I'm not sure you understand the implications. Anything could happen...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 23, 2006, 01:36:21 PM » |
|
What came first the Cadbury's Chocolate Factory or the Twirl?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2006, 01:49:05 PM » |
|
What came first the Cadbury's Chocolate Factory or the Twirl?
Pah! Even I remember the birth of the twirl! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
rajkan
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2006, 01:54:40 PM » |
|
This one really has got everybody thinking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
R Kanabar
|
|
|
|
bolt pp
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2006, 02:08:44 PM » |
|
Easy, GM Egg
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bongo
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 23, 2006, 03:06:53 PM » |
|
I agree with bolt.
The prechicken laid the eqq and the first chicken came out of it.
Evolution or some such...
>:?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
|
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2006, 03:09:08 PM » |
|
Agree with bolt and bongogogogogo
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2006, 06:23:21 PM » |
|
I would have raised the flop but i think you have to pass this river.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
rajkan
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 24, 2006, 01:01:50 PM » |
|
ok - if we are going to look at it from a genetic point of view rather than a culinary one i say that the egg came first. Creatures were laying eggs way past before the chicken evolved from another bird like creature.
Surely this bird like creature would have been a chicken ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
R Kanabar
|
|
|
|
bolt pp
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 24, 2006, 01:23:04 PM » |
|
On reflection it has to be the chicken. An eggs just too fragile and cant be trusted to survive and not crack or split, its just to delicate to entrust with the beginning of such a popular foodstuff, if the egg cracked before it hatched its goodnight nurse. A chicken is the logical choice for the creator. its more durable...................Ask Dik9 he's seen the video  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 24, 2006, 01:24:43 PM by bolt pp »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author