poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 28, 2025, 04:05:22 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262543
Posts in
66609
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision (Read 4740 times)
Sheriff Fatman
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5904
World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
on:
December 12, 2006, 05:59:38 PM »
Not sure if this has been discussed before (search function appears to be playing up) but the WSOP ME coverage concluded on Sunday and there was a fascinating hand with three players remaining.
Jamie Gold is the massive chip leader and has been playing LAG throughout, both Paul Wasicka and Michael Binger have around 11 million in chips (according to Wasicka's blog - I can't find a conclusive count) but from the TV coverage it looked as if Wasicka was 2nd in chips at the time (which perhaps affected my interpretation of the hand). There's around 90m chips in play, so Gold must be on around 68m if the other counts are correct.
Blinds are 200k/400k with a 50k ante. Jamie Gold limps from the button (not unusual for him, he liked to see flops) with
, Wasicka completes from the small blind with
and Binger then makes it 1.5m with
. Both Gold and Wasicka call the raise.
Flop comes
, giving Binger top pair, Gold a straight draw and Wasicka an open-ended straight flush draw.
Binger bets 3.5m, Gold then pushes, leaving Wasicka with a decision to make. After several announcements of 'sick' he folds, Binger calls. Turn brings the
, completing Gold's straight but the river brings the
which meant that Wasicka would have won the hand. In interviews he stated that he felt confident of beating Gold in heads up play (he actually said if he had a 9:1 chip deficit he still thought he would beat him) but I'm intrigued as to whether he should have taken the shot of eating away at Gold's stack with such a massive draw.
My thinking on immediately seeing the hand was that he should've pushed, as he would've been guaranteed 2nd place if Gold won the hand. Reading the accounts of the hand as above show Binger and Wasicka's chip-stacks to be similar, although on TV it looks as if Wasicka is comfortably second. I'd assumed from the coverage that Binger is pot-committed from his bet but I guess he has enough to fold if Wasicka calls the all-in, so the interpretation is slightly different.
Its about as fascinating a hand as you're ever likely to see for such huge stakes. Winner gets $12m, 2nd gets $6.1m and 3rd 'only' gets $4.1m. This is part of the reason why I'm tempted to gamble in Wasicka's shoes, its not as if I'm on the poverty line if I don't take the shot.
Just intrigued as to other's thoughts on this. I found a YouTube link to the hand in question if you want to see it as it plays out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAYxRca8Gkk
Sheriff
«
Last Edit: December 12, 2006, 08:32:00 PM by Sheriff Fatman
»
Logged
"...And If You Flash Him A Smile He'll Take Your Teeth As Deposit..."
"Sheriff Fatman" - Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine
2006 Blonde Caption Comp Ultimate Champion (to be replaced by actual poker achievements when I have any)
GUKPT Online Main Event Winner 2008 (yay, a poker achievement!)
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15483
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #1 on:
December 12, 2006, 06:10:41 PM »
I remember watching this live at the time and when Wasicka said he folded 87 spades I thought it was an atrocious fold. Not even Phil Ivey would have considered himself to have a big enough edge over Gold to pass up this opportunity to triple up.
Logged
Rookie (Rodney)
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 12991
ISHIKAWAAAAAAAAA
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #2 on:
December 12, 2006, 06:56:17 PM »
HOW CAN HE FOLD?
? WHY DOES HE MAKE THE PREFLOP CALL IF HE AINT GONNA PUT HIS CHIPS IN ON THAT DRAW FFS!!! LOL
Logged
HI HELEN!
NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20204
Enchantment? Enchantment!
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #3 on:
December 12, 2006, 06:57:21 PM »
Awful pass, why call a raise if you're going to fold. If Gold has a bigger f-draw, so be it, I've still got outs and most likely live cards to pair.
Logged
http://www.justgiving.com/ChrisKPHall
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #4 on:
December 12, 2006, 07:02:07 PM »
I was shouting at the screen when he folded that - even Tighty would have been in there (possibly). I thought he definitely had the second largest stack before that hand.
Another hand I thought was strange, was Cunningham's all-in with the TT. As the 'best' player at the table surely he should be looking to avoid coin-flips that could knock him out, and still wouldn't put him in the driving seat to win? As it happened, he was actually a big dog when the money went in. Overall, a poor play I thought. Or have I got the thinking wrong?
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Sheriff Fatman
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5904
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #5 on:
December 12, 2006, 07:03:10 PM »
His reasoning on his blog is that he expects Binger to fold if he calls and he fears Gold is on a bigger flush draw, thus reducing his outs. Like I said the interpretation is different from seeing it on screen only (my initial reaction was similar).
For me though, they've passed the point where the money is an issue in terms of being 'life changing' so its all about the win now. I'd hope I'd be willing to gamble there in his shoes but how do we know how we'll react in the heat of the moment?
Logged
"...And If You Flash Him A Smile He'll Take Your Teeth As Deposit..."
"Sheriff Fatman" - Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine
2006 Blonde Caption Comp Ultimate Champion (to be replaced by actual poker achievements when I have any)
GUKPT Online Main Event Winner 2008 (yay, a poker achievement!)
Sheriff Fatman
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5904
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #6 on:
December 12, 2006, 07:08:47 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on December 12, 2006, 07:02:07 PM
I was shouting at the screen when he folded that - even Tighty would have been in there (possibly). I thought he definitely had the second largest stack before that hand.
Another hand I thought was strange, was Cunningham's all-in with the TT. As the 'best' player at the table surely he should be looking to avoid coin-flips that could knock him out, and still wouldn't put him in the driving seat to win? As it happened, he was actually a big dog when the money went in. Overall, a poor play I thought. Or have I got the thinking wrong?
I didn't think this was too bad a play at the time, although I can't remember the full details. The pot has been raised and called, so its a biggie. Gold could have anything and might well take a shot with a lesser hand to knock out a 'danger player' (don't forget the call with a flush draw and one card to come earlier in the tournament vs the Swedish guy).
He's effectively making a squeeze play but with a decent hand. From the coverage it looked as if he's dropped fairly low in chips (but not desperate) but would still need to accumulate enough chips to have a real shot at Gold's stack.
As it turned out Gold made a loose call with KJ (given that there was another player still to act) and won the coin flip. I don't think it was disastrous play on Cunningham's part.
Logged
"...And If You Flash Him A Smile He'll Take Your Teeth As Deposit..."
"Sheriff Fatman" - Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine
2006 Blonde Caption Comp Ultimate Champion (to be replaced by actual poker achievements when I have any)
GUKPT Online Main Event Winner 2008 (yay, a poker achievement!)
matt674
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10250
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #7 on:
December 12, 2006, 07:44:45 PM »
Its fine everyone coming on here and saying "that was an awful pass" and fair enough in a $50 freezeout on pokerstars i'm calling every day of the week - but when your playing for $23,000,000 between the three of you it probably puts a slightly different tint on things. If he calls and misses he's out and walking away with $4,000,000 - if he passes and Gold knocks Binger out (and considering he'd knocked out 5000 runners during the tourney there was probably a fair chance he'd make it 5001) then he's getting $6,000,000 for nothing.
Chances are if Gold folds then he calls..........
Logged
sponsored by Fyffes
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #8 on:
December 12, 2006, 08:30:32 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on December 12, 2006, 07:02:07 PM
I was shouting at the screen when he folded that - even Tighty would have been in there (possibly).
behave,
i'd like to think I'd call, guaranteed $4m if I get knocked out
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Div
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 911
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #9 on:
December 12, 2006, 08:36:54 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on December 12, 2006, 08:30:32 PM
i'd like to think I'd call, guaranteed $4m if I get knocked out
and a great shot at twelve million if you win!
Logged
'Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.'
- Warren Buffett
http://pokerdiv.blogspot.com
totalise
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2620
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #10 on:
December 12, 2006, 08:41:35 PM »
Quote from: Div on December 12, 2006, 08:36:54 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on December 12, 2006, 08:30:32 PM
i'd like to think I'd call, guaranteed $4m if I get knocked out
and a great shot at twelve million if you win!
plus the equity of being the champ, which is at least $10m (from what I heard)
Logged
divingduck
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 117
Trying is the first step towards failure...
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #11 on:
December 12, 2006, 09:02:19 PM »
It took me a nanosecond to get my stack in holding
on a flop of
on day 2 of this years main event and do I regret it? Course i do after the
turn and river but I'd like to think I'm still enough of a donk to have done the same in Wasickas' position.
Logged
I, Zimbra
Fallen Astronaut
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2579
"the wind in my heart, the dust in my head"
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #12 on:
December 12, 2006, 10:54:21 PM »
Was it not Wasicka first to act in that scenario?
In which case, Wasicka had to check the flop first, then Binger bets, then Gold is all-in.
I thought at the time, watching it, that for sure Wasicka was annoyed that he didn't put the first bet in; if he does that, then Binger raises and perhaps Gold passes... or flat calls, which would give Wasicka the correct sequence of events to get his chips in first against Binger, with a hand that's actually a favourite over the TPTK!
Given he figured he could fold himself up to 2nd place, in the heat of battle, I'd say I understood the decision. It looked like he was trying to check-raise all-in against one opponent, but it backfired because both of them caught a piece!
Logged
gadji beri bimba clandridi
lauli lonni cadori gadjam
a bim beri glassala glandride
e glassala tuffm
i zimbra
Sheriff Fatman
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5904
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #13 on:
December 12, 2006, 11:02:06 PM »
Quote from: I, Zimbra on December 12, 2006, 10:54:21 PM
Given he figured he could fold himself up to 2nd place, in the heat of battle, I'd say I understood the decision. It looked like he was trying to check-raise all-in against one opponent, but it backfired because both of them caught a piece!
He was, but Gold's all-in scared him off. Ironically, he's getting much better value with two players in the hand than one and the value of the hand hasn't diminished from the 3-way pot.
Logged
"...And If You Flash Him A Smile He'll Take Your Teeth As Deposit..."
"Sheriff Fatman" - Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine
2006 Blonde Caption Comp Ultimate Champion (to be replaced by actual poker achievements when I have any)
GUKPT Online Main Event Winner 2008 (yay, a poker achievement!)
Wardonkey
No ordinary donkey!
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3645
Re: World Series Main Event - Paul Wasicka decision
«
Reply #14 on:
December 12, 2006, 11:04:02 PM »
Passing didn't guarantee 2nd place. If Gold had not hit then Wasicka would have been left with only half the number of chips held by Binger, both still a long way behind Gold.
Logged
EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...