try and decipher the question.
So you think that anyone who doesn't share your minority opinion must have some sort of agenda?
Not at all mate, just wondered.
As I've said before any programme about gambling that doesn't deliberately set out to tarnish someone is a good one in my opinion.
He tarnished everyone who considers themselves a gambler IMO.
I can understand that some might not like the style of the presenter - but in comparison to most "journalists" who normally make such progs I'm sure even you would agree that (although in your opinion others might have done it better) this kind of presenter was a better choice.
It wasnt necessarily the style of the presenter that made the show garbage, more the content.
Like i said, i will have another look tonight and hope that the content improves, and as tonights show is billed as a "poker episode" im looking forward to it.