poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 19, 2025, 09:01:42 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262325
Posts in
66605
Topics by
16990
Members
Latest Member:
Enut
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
Author
Topic: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU (Read 12616 times)
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #45 on:
February 22, 2007, 06:20:07 PM »
Quote from: brummieboy on February 21, 2007, 05:57:28 PM
Paul, Just watched your William Hill heat last night.
Mr Goodwin said you played your set of Queens like a girl.
Whats your comments on this and what hand/hands did you put the internet qualifier on when he raised your flop bet?
Yes Marc did say that i played like a girl but that doesn't mean I'm going to let him take me from behind and pull my hair!
With regard to the hand in question i thought that my opponent had either JK J9 or a hand that in all probability could not win. On that basis i flat called his check raise on the flop ( i was at this point tending to-wards a hand that could not win as most players if checkraising an amount that does not appear designed to induce a fold do so with a made hand when out of position - unlike those that re raise in position a relatively small amount so that they can win it with the bet, take control of the hand or simply get a free turn card , if they so desire).
I believed that my flat call would almost certainly mean he would bet the turn regardless.
The turn card ( a nine) was at that point about the worst card i could see. He bet and i flat called again. I could have re raised at this point however if he had a made hand that virtually couldn't win ( i accept QJ or similar was possible) i did not want to lose him, if he had JK then re raising would be suicide so the only hand i would want to re raise was J9 and he may not fold anyway ( he was not a rock).
The river card ( a king) was again just about the worst card i could see and Marc saying that i should fold was probably right. Ultimately i called because i felt that with what was in the pot and the amount i had to call it was almost justified on the off chance that my initial feeling on the flop was correct. This combined with the inherent poker player need to punish yourself and still call after its all gone wrong and the milk has turned sour, resulted in the call.
Having said all that i was short stacked all the way through and i thought i was a little unlucky not to get down to the last 2 players and i think i would have done had i won the last hand.
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
maldini32
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3356
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #46 on:
February 22, 2007, 06:27:57 PM »
Wot did you think of Lisandro Paul? I thought he played really weak throughout and there were definetly better players than him on that table.
Logged
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #47 on:
February 22, 2007, 11:51:42 PM »
Quote from: maldini32 on February 22, 2007, 06:27:57 PM
Wot did you think of Lisandro Paul? I thought he played really weak throughout and there were definitely better players than him on that table.
To be honest at the table he certainly never gave the impression of playing in any way weak and considering the results he has had i would not say he was a weak player and whatever way you describe his style it certainly works for him.
i did not notice him make a significant mistake ( given that he could not see the cards) and i think that is more important than appearing weak or strong.
I think he is a great player and i wouldn't say that any other player at the table could reasonably say they were a noticeably better player than him.
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
brummieboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2072
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #48 on:
February 23, 2007, 04:05:39 PM »
Quote from: actionjack on February 22, 2007, 06:20:07 PM
Quote from: brummieboy on February 21, 2007, 05:57:28 PM
Paul, Just watched your William Hill heat last night.
Mr Goodwin said you played your set of Queens like a girl.
Whats your comments on this and what hand/hands did you put the internet qualifier on when he raised your flop bet?
Yes Marc did say that i played like a girl but that doesn't mean I'm going to let him take me from behind and pull my hair!
With regard to the hand in question i thought that my opponent had either JK J9 or a hand that in all probability could not win. On that basis i flat called his check raise on the flop ( i was at this point tending to-wards a hand that could not win as most players if checkraising an amount that does not appear designed to induce a fold do so with a made hand when out of position - unlike those that re raise in position a relatively small amount so that they can win it with the bet, take control of the hand or simply get a free turn card , if they so desire).
I believed that my flat call would almost certainly mean he would bet the turn regardless.
The turn card ( a nine) was at that point about the worst card i could see. He bet and i flat called again. I could have re raised at this point however if he had a made hand that virtually couldn't win ( i accept QJ or similar was possible) i did not want to lose him, if he had JK then re raising would be suicide so the only hand i would want to re raise was J9 and he may not fold anyway ( he was not a rock).
The river card ( a king) was again just about the worst card i could see and Marc saying that i should fold was probably right. Ultimately i called because i felt that with what was in the pot and the amount i had to call it was almost justified on the off chance that my initial feeling on the flop was correct. This combined with the inherent poker player need to punish yourself and still call after its all gone wrong and the milk has turned sour, resulted in the call.
Having said all that i was short stacked all the way through and i thought i was a little unlucky not to get down to the last 2 players and i think i would have done had i won the last hand.
I hear this used to be the way you secured your buy-ins for your first few live events.
Logged
taximan007
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3130
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #49 on:
February 26, 2007, 03:15:45 AM »
Just like to say congratulations Paul on winning your Cruise Ticket last night, didnt see any of the game, but i did notice with about 19 left you were bottom of the stack, so very well played, if it was anything like the "old days" when you were there I can imagine the accusations of it being "rigged" in your favour flying around thick and fast lmao.
Well Done again Paul.
Logged
humbled to be included alongside such esteemed people - thank you
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #50 on:
February 27, 2007, 04:59:14 PM »
Quote from: taximan007 on February 26, 2007, 03:15:45 AM
Just like to say congratulations Paul on winning your Cruise Ticket last night, didnt see any of the game, but i did notice with about 19 left you were bottom of the stack, so very well played, if it was anything like the "old days" when you were there I can imagine the accusations of it being "rigged" in your favour flying around thick and fast lmao.
Well Done again Paul.
tyvm
yes i was lowest stack from about 23 players out down to about 16 with 3 seats but ended up winning it after plodding away.
Fortunately i only had 2 accusations of the software being rigged for me to win, quite a result i thought !!
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
Micko
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1158
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #51 on:
March 02, 2007, 10:32:37 AM »
Hey paul,
Just wondering how ure good mate sealey upto is he still playin doset seem to be on the circuit much these days?
Played with him at the cavendish absolute gent and a class player too
Logged
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #52 on:
March 04, 2007, 10:10:19 PM »
Quote from: Micko on March 02, 2007, 10:32:37 AM
Hey paul,
Just wondering how ure good mate sealey upto is he still playin doset seem to be on the circuit much these days?
Played with him at the cavendish absolute gent and a class player too
Hi
Yes he does still pay and will probably be playing a lot at this years WSOP. He doesn't play many circuit games and he believes it is bad value in terms of time and expenses as compared to how convenient it is on line- particularly when you are as good a NL cash player as he is.
Indeed he is a gent and very much a class player.- dont be surprised if he returns with a bracelet!
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
hotdog
snap
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 637
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #53 on:
March 04, 2007, 11:55:46 PM »
Quote from: actionjack on February 22, 2007, 06:20:07 PM
Quote from: brummieboy on February 21, 2007, 05:57:28 PM
Paul, Just watched your William Hill heat last night.
Mr Goodwin said you played your set of Queens like a girl.
Whats your comments on this and what hand/hands did you put the internet qualifier on when he raised your flop bet?
Yes Marc did say that i played like a girl but that doesn't mean I'm going to let him take me from behind and pull my hair!
With regard to the hand in question i thought that my opponent had either JK J9 or a hand that in all probability could not win. On that basis i flat called his check raise on the flop ( i was at this point tending to-wards a hand that could not win as most players if checkraising an amount that does not appear designed to induce a fold do so with a made hand when out of position - unlike those that re raise in position a relatively small amount so that they can win it with the bet, take control of the hand or simply get a free turn card , if they so desire).
I believed that my flat call would almost certainly mean he would bet the turn regardless.
The turn card ( a nine) was at that point about the worst card i could see. He bet and i flat called again. I could have re raised at this point however if he had a made hand that virtually couldn't win ( i accept QJ or similar was possible) i did not want to lose him, if he had JK then re raising would be suicide so the only hand i would want to re raise was J9 and he may not fold anyway ( he was not a rock).
The river card ( a king) was again just about the worst card i could see and Marc saying that i should fold was probably right. Ultimately i called because i felt that with what was in the pot and the amount i had to call it was almost justified on the off chance that my initial feeling on the flop was correct. This combined with the inherent poker player need to punish yourself and still call after its all gone wrong and the milk has turned sour, resulted in the call.
Having said all that i was short stacked all the way through and i thought i was a little unlucky not to get down to the last 2 players and i think i would have done had i won the last hand.
What Hair
Logged
vinni
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2175
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #54 on:
March 07, 2007, 10:30:59 PM »
how come you and chubby got in with these lot neither of you are good looking ,
i thought you had to look like a male model ,i know chubbs models busses ,what do you model lol.
Logged
i`v become cos`s bitch
Pokerron
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 368
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #55 on:
March 21, 2007, 11:15:54 PM »
You were due round my house in December 2005 for an episode of poker godfather, i assume it's not running anymore and you wont be coming?
Seriously though, how annoying was it to teach people who thought it a good idea to noisily eat a 5 course meal during taping?
Logged
The Thread Killer
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #56 on:
March 25, 2007, 05:16:53 PM »
Quote from: Pokerron on March 21, 2007, 11:15:54 PM
You were due round my house in December 2005 for an episode of poker godfather, i assume it's not running anymore and you wont be coming?
Seriously though, how annoying was it to teach people who thought it a good idea to noisily eat a 5 course meal during taping?
It was temporarily shelved but is still on the shelf unfortunately.
The eating wasnt too bad and to be fair to some of those that did it was encouraged by the film crew in order to give that "real life" feeling apparently,
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
Jack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 112
Jack (The Rack) Owen
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #57 on:
April 03, 2007, 04:49:43 PM »
Paul its Jack. Hope u r well m8.
Situation for u (and advice needed please)- In the last GUKPT in Cardiff I was goin really well on the 1st night with about 30 mins to go I had 38k. Av end of play about 32k I think.
In the last half an hour I managed to lose about half my stack!!
Firstly re raising a serial raiser with QQ only to be put all in by the table chip leader..fold.
Folded to me I raise on the button with 77 called by bb.flop 6 3 2 rainbow.he checked i bet quite big he dwelled then moved all in!! I passed he showed JJ! Happy but still gutted to losing lot of chips....
Do you still play the same way even though its late and end of play was near??
Something tellin me I did something wrong even though I was pleased with the way I played those hands...
Any advice would be great m8.
Jack
Logged
actionjack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 275
i love puppies
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #58 on:
April 16, 2007, 05:13:44 PM »
Quote from: Jack on April 03, 2007, 04:49:43 PM
Paul its Jack. Hope u r well m8.
Situation for u (and advice needed please)- In the last GUKPT in Cardiff I was going really well on the 1st night with about 30 mins to go I had 38k. Av end of play about 32k I think.
In the last half an hour I managed to lose about half my stack!!
Firstly re raising a serial raiser with QQ only to be put all in by the table chip leader..fold.
Folded to me I raise on the button with 77 called by bb.flop 6 3 2 rainbow.he checked i bet quite big he dwelled then moved all in!! I passed he showed JJ! Happy but still gutted to losing lot of chips....
Do you still play the same way even though its late and end of play was near??
Something tellin me I did something wrong even though I was pleased with the way I played those hands...
Any advice would be great m8.
Jack
Hi Jack
I do not think anyone can reasonably knock the way you played either hand.
In the first hand it is worth bearing in mind (though this does not mean that your fold was a bad one) that when the serial raiser raises and you re raise the opponent who then re raised you is aware that your range of re raising hands (versus the serial raiser) may well be wider than normal and so he is more likely to have a wider range of hands (many worse than QQ) with which he may re raise your re raise.
The likelihood of your QQ being in front depends on the nature of the player that re raised your re raise and only you can answer that based on the information available to you at the time.
Generally speaking if a player raises , you re raise and a player behind you re raises again, it is not often than QQ will be in good shape.
With regard to the 77 on the button i think you made a great lay down and again, subject to your perception of the player that check raised you Allin on the flop i think in many circumstances i would have great difficulty in making that good lay down.
All in all i think you played the hands very well .
good luck
Paul
Logged
"you have to be in it to win it" good players mean the tournament bad ones mean the pot.
Jack
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 112
Jack (The Rack) Owen
Re: PAUL "ACTIONJACK" JACKSON - Monte Carlo Millions RU
«
Reply #59 on:
April 17, 2007, 09:41:50 AM »
Cheers m8 hopefully go a little further this weekend in Manchester...
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...