MikkyT - We get the truth from the BBC

[Sunday8pm]

Sorry to throw maybe another spanner into the works. But any of you who think MikkyT ISN'T a sick fucker then read this.

an internet gaming forum he used to post on, this happened when he was done for 'drink driving'. His comments are on page 7.

sick sick sick sick piece of shit

link removed

pm for link

[Newmanseye]

Should there be a link or an article?

[Sunday8pm]

yup sorry, tired

[Newmanseye]

I wish I hadnt read it now, I really fwwl sick about this again.

[Sunday8pm]

absolutly fucking disgusting. Too right 95% of people on this thread think torturing him is sufficient punishment

[bolt pp]

"then defending the right of someone to make a post"about moving to Scotland" if everybody sees that comment lacks decency, then guess what? regardless of what the poster thinks it lacks decency"

This statement is so wrong for a multitude of what I'd consider obvious reasons but wont expound upon them because you are not listening to a word I'm saying.

Then came the line about snyde remarks. snyde remarks are said behind someones back to undermine them, these were right out in the open hidden from on one, what were snyde about them.

Firstly your definition about the term snyde is incorrect, the word snyde can be used to describe all manor of pernicious, disreputable, mendacious, and duplicitous behaviour and is not a word specific to the aforementioned reference.

You ask why this is a snyde remark and I'll tell you, this is an open form where the poster in question has continual access, a dissparaging comment was made about him in the third person, simple really, third person derogatory reference in their(virtual) presence is not questionably snyde, it's the epitome of it!!!

you then go on to call me childish and churlish and make reference to my using sarcasm to somehow retract my earlier posts.

I can unequivocally state with equable veracity that in no way was my post meant to be sarcastic or insulting, the one where i highlighted your conflicting posts.

The very reason i made my, albeit concise, second explanation is because you led off in your post with:I FAIL TO SEE WHAT POINT YOU ARE MAKING HERE BOLT which you then show in the rest of your post by displaying not even a rudimentary understanding of what i was saying, so after i politely described for you why i had made the post about which you had questioned me, based predominantly on the above statement you lead off in your next post with...........I know the point you were making Bolt   From which i derived two possibilities:

1) you're taking the piss out of me

2)You've got no idea what your talking about

Either way Ive concluded that in keeping with your closing assertion we have no further discussion or interaction on here of any nature.

[Ginger]

Cool it down Guys please, debating is fine, but we wouldn't want to have to lock the thread for everyone to calm down.

[Sunday8pm]

absolutly fucking disgusting. Too right 95% of people on this thread think torturing him is sufficient punishment

What type of forum is it?
Had to stop reading after 2 posts of the sick bastards. Is there anything there which could increase his sentence.

Its for internet gamers. World of Warcraft etc

[KingPoker]

absolutly fucking disgusting. Too right 95% of people on this thread think torturing him is sufficient punishment

What type of forum is it?
Had to stop reading after 2 posts of the sick bastards. Is there anything there which could increase his sentence.

Its for internet gamers. World of Warcraft etc

wow, just read it, very weird group of people!

[Acidmouse]

Someone pm link pls..interested as i play wow.

[smithy69]

could someone pm it top me aswell

thnx

[marcro]

hmmmm, just came back on here and have to apologise for upsetting some people which was not my intention.  My reply was to Red's post asking would you want a child molestor living in your road.  I would want them shipped as far away from me as possible which just happens in this case to be Scotland.  No offense intended to the Scots and in hindsight, considering the emotion this terrible situation has caused, I should have just said to ship them as far away as possible.  In no case would I want to see such a criminal living amongst law abiding people knowing that it is highly likely that they will commit a repeat offence.

[RED-DOG]

My reply was to Red's post asking would you want a child molestor living in your road.

I don't remember that post.

[marcro]

My reply was to Red's post asking would you want a child molestor living in your road.

I don't remember that post.

Apologies again, the memory is not serving me well.  The post was from taximan007:

Just a question to all:

A convicted child abuser serves his/her time in prison. Is successfully rehabilitated (according to the experts), is then given a new identity etc and the housed in YOUR street. (Hypothetically, you are made aware of this by the police, obviously this would never happen)

Would you be Happy?

[kvnstv]

Horrible situation for a lot of people in this community.  Paedophiles by there very nature have to be experts in duplicity and deception. This man must have kept this secret from friends and family for his whole life so anyone who thinks they should have seen through him; well you never had a chance really.

Its such a difficult concept to deal with, so alien to our sense of right and wrong when those least able to protect themselves are targeted in such a vile way. Hard to think of a worse crime than to rob a child of there innocence, makes one so sad and angry.
 
I must admit to being troubled by the calls for hard prison time, although as a parent of a young daughter I understand the rage the very thought of these type of offence stir in people. The more I analyse the problem the more the thought of punishing the offenders becomes an irrelevance. To me the very crux of the matter is the offenders potential to cause more damage to the previous or new victims.

If it was proven that a certain type of paedophile could only be cured by 5 years of daily beatings and a starvation diet or 5 years of intense psychological help then would it really matter which was used as long as the end result was that the individual would cause no more damage? I don’t know how this could be done but I think we need to spend more time and money finding solutions to a problem that just won’t go away.

I think my point is that the most important result from the capture of a paedophile is that they should never re-offend, whether through treatment or through permanent incarceration it does not really matter. I think most people would agree that the worse case scenario would be six years of the hardest time only to be released without being cured, with no place in society and angry more victims become almost inevitable.