blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2025, 05:04:18 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262448 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Diaries and Blogs
| | |-+  Vegas & The Aftermath - Diary
0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 160 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 168 ... 3823 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Vegas & The Aftermath - Diary  (Read 7924061 times)
byronkincaid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5024



View Profile
« Reply #2445 on: January 02, 2008, 09:58:16 AM »

is this as simple as saying we are against a possibe range of say TT+ AQ+ so we are 50/50ish

if we fold we get £1920

if we push and he calls 50% of the time we get £760 50% of the time we get £4000 = £380 + £2000 = £2380 which is an EV of £460?

If that's right (which is unlikely with my maths of course) that's quite an expensive pass.
Logged
RobS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 505



View Profile
« Reply #2446 on: January 02, 2008, 10:06:51 AM »

is this as simple as saying we are against a possibe range of say TT+ AQ+ so we are 50/50ish

if we fold we get £1920

if we push and he calls 50% of the time we get £760 50% of the time we get £4000 = £380 + £2000 = £2380 which is an EV of £460?

If that's right (which is unlikely with my maths of course) that's quite an expensive pass.

Exactly, it really is as simple as that unless there are other factors to consider. I think Tikay knows this, and is basically saying that he would still rather lock up the £1,920 even though it is a massively -EV decision.
Logged
Graham C
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20663


Moo


View Profile
« Reply #2447 on: January 02, 2008, 10:37:46 AM »

It may have been a -EV decision, but it's still worth £1200,

I'd have taken the cash, but then I'm only small fry. Depends on your situation imo.  Neither is a bad decision.

Well played Tikay.
Logged

Bongo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8824



View Profile
« Reply #2448 on: January 02, 2008, 01:21:59 PM »

It's always possible he would have won with the all in...
Logged

Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
77dave
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010


5 2 off


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2449 on: January 02, 2008, 01:24:37 PM »

None of you have allowed in your maths for the chance that someone behind Tikay might call and then someone is knocked out resulting in Tikay laddering in the chip count
Logged

Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
Dingdell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6619



View Profile
« Reply #2450 on: January 02, 2008, 01:25:03 PM »

Nice result Tikay.  
Logged
celtic
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19188



View Profile
« Reply #2451 on: January 02, 2008, 01:31:30 PM »

None of you have allowed in your maths for the chance that someone behind Tikay might call and then someone is knocked out resulting in Tikay laddering in the chip count


 


Plus if your happy with 2k and the extra makes a difference then the fold is the correct decision. No need to gamble in that situation imo.

Nice result sir.
Logged

Keefy is back Smiley But for how long?
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2452 on: January 02, 2008, 02:06:17 PM »

None of you have allowed in your maths for the chance that someone behind Tikay might call and then someone is knocked out resulting in Tikay laddering in the chip count

Or he beats both of them, and increases his chip-stack even further.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2453 on: January 02, 2008, 02:07:33 PM »

I completely understand the fold BUT it is of course a -EV move. If this situation occured regularly and everytime you took the fold option you would be losing a tonne of money in the long run.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
amcgrath1uk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5424


View Profile
« Reply #2454 on: January 02, 2008, 02:29:26 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation
Logged

jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1499



View Profile
« Reply #2455 on: January 02, 2008, 03:30:51 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation

This is exactly the issue, poker players shouldn't pass up +EV situations to lock up money. It is correct, profitable decisions that matter in poker not pots or whats locked up.

Nice touch tho TK
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47401



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2456 on: January 02, 2008, 03:38:11 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation

This is exactly the issue, poker players shouldn't pass up +EV situations to lock up money. It is correct, profitable decisions that matter in poker not pots or whats locked up.

Nice touch tho TK

But if you run out of money, you might not be able to play the next game, so you will miss many more + EV situations.

If someone gave you 6/4 on the toss of a coin for all the money you would ever have during your lifetime, could you take the chance?
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2457 on: January 02, 2008, 03:43:03 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation

This is exactly the issue, poker players shouldn't pass up +EV situations to lock up money. It is correct, profitable decisions that matter in poker not pots or whats locked up.

Nice touch tho TK

But if you run out of money, you might not be able to play the next game, so you will miss many more + EV situations.

If someone gave you 6/4 on the toss of a coin for all the money you would ever have during your lifetime, could you take the chance?

If that was really the case here I would suggest he shouldn't have sat down in this game in the first place.
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2458 on: January 02, 2008, 03:43:43 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation

This is exactly the issue, poker players shouldn't pass up +EV situations to lock up money. It is correct, profitable decisions that matter in poker not pots or whats locked up.

Nice touch tho TK

But if you run out of money, you might not be able to play the next game, so you will miss many more + EV situations.

If someone gave you 6/4 on the toss of a coin for all the money you would ever have during your lifetime, could you take the chance?

There is a good argument to be had there Red but Tikay isn't that person, half an hour of work at Sky makes up the difference in money for him.
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47401



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2459 on: January 02, 2008, 03:47:20 PM »

In a usual sense I would push it all in. However with the impending finish and chip count it is more sensible to take the guaranteed money. Whether long term its +ve or -ve isn't the issue, its the specific situation that he's in. I'd be taking the 2k and running in this situation

This is exactly the issue, poker players shouldn't pass up +EV situations to lock up money. It is correct, profitable decisions that matter in poker not pots or whats locked up.

Nice touch tho TK

But if you run out of money, you might not be able to play the next game, so you will miss many more + EV situations.

If someone gave you 6/4 on the toss of a coin for all the money you would ever have during your lifetime, could you take the chance?

There is a good argument to be had there Red but Tikay isn't that person, half an hour of work at Sky makes up the difference in money for him.

The quote doesn't say tikay, it says "Poker players"
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Pages: 1 ... 160 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 168 ... 3823 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.164 seconds with 19 queries.