blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 09:31:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262325 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Understanding Probability (poker game of skill?)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Understanding Probability (poker game of skill?)  (Read 10324 times)
jakally
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2003



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2008, 12:58:54 PM »

So the next time you see Gus Hansen type players stick it in knowing their only 40%, try hard not to call them a donkey and think back to their 'aim' when making that decision. Some players might consider a 30% chance (pot odds or no pot odds) enough to justify their decision given their view of the situation and under their financial circumstances.


IMO, so much of a successful poker players edge come from creating fold equity situations, that it is impossible to judge their ability just on hands where they get called with a less than even chance of winning.

Logged
stoneii
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


Chad Brown & a bald fat bloke :) -Irish Open '07


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2008, 01:14:52 PM »

Quote
In reality, we will either be lucky or unlucky poker players, and there is nothing we can do about it.

Ok, but at what stage in our poker lives will we know if we're going to lucky or unlucky from here on in?
Logged

Where there's muck there's brass Wink
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2008, 01:36:30 PM »

If presented with a situation where you're 99% to win £100,000 but 1% to get a bullet in your head my personal 'correct' decision would be to fold

call ftw

Obv level.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: May 23, 2008, 01:39:40 PM »

Snoops wrote an interesting article related to the idea of 'it'll even out over the long term'.  Think it was in Flush magazine.

Basically, he said that if you tend to get your money in ahead, you're not likely to enjoy as many 'outdraws' as the player who is more likely to stick his money in as a dog.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2008, 01:42:38 PM »

Snoops wrote an interesting article related to the idea of 'it'll even out over the long term'.  Think it was in Flush magazine.

Basically, he said that if you tend to get your money in ahead, you're not likely to enjoy as many 'outdraws' as the player who is more likely to stick his money in as a dog.


a wise man, our Snoops Smiley
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: May 23, 2008, 01:43:57 PM »

The point being that it won't 'even out over the long term'.

(just in case that was missed)
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16192


Let's go round again


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 23, 2008, 01:49:23 PM »

The point being that it won't 'even out over the long term'.

(just in case that was missed)

exactly the conclusion I came to the other day when thinking about EV graphs. then I realised I was wrong. then I realised I wasn't sure.

so the conclusion is it will level out over the long term but 'even out' is the wrong term. maybe

flipping a coin will even out long term, putting your money in as a 60/40 fav will level out to 60% won, putting it in as a 70/30 dog will level out to a 30% win
Logged

If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
jakally
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2003



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: May 23, 2008, 02:00:54 PM »

Quote
In reality, we will either be lucky or unlucky poker players, and there is nothing we can do about it.

Ok, but at what stage in our poker lives will we know if we're going to lucky or unlucky from here on in?

Trying to classify players as lucky or unlucky is too black or white.

Everyone will have periods of good and bad luck - trying to define which category you fall into will depend on the point in time that you try and make the judgement.

Logged
stoneii
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


Chad Brown & a bald fat bloke :) -Irish Open '07


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 23, 2008, 02:26:00 PM »

Quote
Trying to classify players as lucky or unlucky is too black or white.

Everyone will have periods of good and bad luck - trying to define which category you fall into will depend on the point in time that you try and make the judgement.

Is that not my point just in more words Smiley
Logged

Where there's muck there's brass Wink
jakally
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2003



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 23, 2008, 02:27:11 PM »

Quote
Trying to classify players as lucky or unlucky is too black or white.

Everyone will have periods of good and bad luck - trying to define which category you fall into will depend on the point in time that you try and make the judgement.

Is that not my point just in more words Smiley

In all probability . . . . .. yes!
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10906



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: May 23, 2008, 02:33:38 PM »

If presented with a situation where you're 99% to win £100,000 but 1% to get a bullet in your head my personal 'correct' decision would be to fold

call ftw

Obv level.

no, because ive come up with a variable.

if i pick the option that kills me then i'll go up to the geezer thats gonna shoot me, knock him out and bowl off with the money.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: May 23, 2008, 02:37:29 PM »

If presented with a situation where you're 99% to win £100,000 but 1% to get a bullet in your head my personal 'correct' decision would be to fold

call ftw

Obv level.

no, because ive come up with a variable.

if i pick the option that kills me then i'll go up to the geezer thats gonna shoot me, knock him out and bowl off with the money.

Ah - I thought you were telling him to call with the bet, rather than you being in the situation.

Obv level.

Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Rupert
:)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2119



View Profile WWW
« Reply #27 on: May 23, 2008, 03:18:17 PM »

i've found the summary for OPs post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance
the average squared dispersion from the mean of a random event... or luck to some
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.127 seconds with 20 queries.